On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, August 7 at 01:52 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
Consider if you were instead changing the Subject header. For example:
send-hook '~C d...@example.com' 'my_hdr Subject: [dudemail]'
Munging that a bit, I seem to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Friday, August 7 at 08:09 PM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, August 7 at 01:52 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
Consider if you were instead changing the Subject header. For
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:21:22AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, August 7 at 08:09 PM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
Hmmm. I think there must be a misunderstanding between us somewhere
here. If you're happy, that's great, and nevermind the rest. But
unless I misunderstand how mutt works,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Saturday, August 8 at 01:55 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
Well, I've gone back for the third time, to check what happens on
compose (m), and list reply (L). In my now disused cross-gcc
mailbox, with no send-hook and no Reply-To: in the test
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:26:14PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
For example, with your Reply-To setting it may happen that all initial
recipients are in the group and a special settings thus applies. From
the compose menu you (for whatever reason) decide to add somebody else
not in this group.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Friday, August 7 at 12:04 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:26:14PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
For example, with your Reply-To setting it may happen that all initial
recipients are in the group and a special settings
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:35:09AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, August 7 at 12:04 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
Well, send-hook is slightly mis-named. A more accurate name would be
compose-hook, because it's triggered whenever a new message is being
composed.
Sounds good so far,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Friday, August 7 at 01:52 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen:
Right. Here's the reasoning: the message needs to be built *before*
the send-hook triggers. For example, what would you expect the
following to do?
send-hook '~h Reply-to:'
