setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid nor setuid in other message)? I changed it to 755 and I still get read-only permission on /var/spool/mail/vdanen which has -rw-rw permissions and is owned by vdanen.mail. I can't delete any messages in my inbox with the new

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Thomas Roessler
mutt_dotlock setgid mail.

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Thomas Roessler
I wrote a moment ago: Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock. In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to that directory, which is normally enabled by making mutt_dotlock setgid mail. To illustrate things, here's an example from my system: % ls -ld /var/spool

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:43:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock. In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to that directory, which is normally enabled by making mutt_dotlock setgid mail. To illustrate things

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:08:14PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: Is mutt_dotlock supposed to be setgid (sorry Mikko, I meant setgid Yes, it needs to be setgid to the group that owns the mail spool directory. That's the whole point of it. Dotlocking in some configurations needs to be

Re: setgid on mutt_dotlock?

2000-06-20 Thread Vincent Danen
, not of the _file_ in that directory Dotlocking will create a file /var/spool/mail/vdanen.lock. In order to do this, mutt_dotlock needs write access to that directory, which is normally enabled by making mutt_dotlock setgid mail. Ok, but the permissions seem to be fine for that directory