Re: Customizing mutt

2000-02-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: I want to make "collapse-all" standard. I couldn't find a variable for that so i tried I only see set collapse_unread in the manual folder-hook =* 'collapse-all' folder-hook =* 'collapse-all' folder-hook . set

gpg hassles with mutt

2000-02-12 Thread Salvatore Greco
I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for their privacy needs. I have installed GPG and I replaced the relevant sections of the .muttrc file and this is the error I get. If I run gpg filename on the saved email message, it works. Any ideas ? Please help. [-- PGP output follows

procmail not processing application/pgp?

2000-02-12 Thread Horacio MG
Hi, I just received a message sent with pine and gnupg signed using application/pgp, and didn't catch the sig: Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="135843165-1694285145-950362731=:690" A second message (same person, same sig, also pine) was correctly processed: Content-Type:

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

2000-02-12 Thread Sean F Rima
Hi Salvatore! In your muttrc add: source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists. If not it should be in the contrib section of the tarball. Sean On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote: I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for their privacy needs. I have installed GPG

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

2000-02-12 Thread Lars Hecking
Sean F Rima writes: Hi Salvatore! In your muttrc add: source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists. If not it should be in the contrib section of the tarball. Sean On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote: I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for their

save-hook for 'mutt-users' list doesn't work

2000-02-12 Thread Peter Poeml
Hi, I'm using Mutt 0.93.1i (1998-07-14) on Linux 2.0.36 [using ncurses 4.2] and I'm perfectly happy with it. One thing is strange to me: I've got some lists defined so I can save messages to default folders. This works for all of them except for the mutt-users list! Here's a part of my .muttrc:

[solved] Re: mail does not reach certain hosts

2000-02-12 Thread Michael Tatge
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 02:15:47AM +, Lars Hecking wrote: Michael Tatge writes: I have a major problem with Mutt 1.0i. Mail to some hosts does not reach its destination without me getting an error message. I use sendmail as MTA and it seems that sendmail is correctly configured. When I

Adding fields to (MH) messages

2000-02-12 Thread Jos Vos
Hi, When I use Mutt for MH folders, it adds Status and Content-Length fields to each individual message and thus changes all files, even whena you have only opened the folder and not touched any messages. When you have MH folders with thousands of messsages (4000+), this is not really a

Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-12 Thread Horacio MG
Hi, I just realized that I can specify more than one recipient in the reply-to header. I tried this as out of need to have some replies sent over to different addresses. The mail arrives fine, with the two addresses included in the Reply-To field (as you might be able to see in this message),

Re: save-hook for 'mutt-users' list doesn't work

2000-02-12 Thread Brett Neely
perfectly happy with it. One thing is strange to me: I've got some lists defined so I can save messages to default folders. This works for all of them except for the mutt-users list! Here's a part of my .muttrc: save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +mutt-users The list is hosted at mutt.org, so

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

2000-02-12 Thread Sean F Rima
Hi Lars! On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: In your muttrc add: source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists. If not it should be in the contrib section of the tarball. On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote: I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for their

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-12 Thread hillyer
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 08:29:55PM +0100, Horacio MG wrote: Hi, I just realized that I can specify more than one recipient in the reply-to header. I tried this as out of need to have some replies sent over to different addresses. The mail arrives fine, with the two addresses included in

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-12 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Horacio MG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 12 Feb 2000: [yes] replies to the first address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [no] replies to the second address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) My Mutt (1.1.3) behaves differently too. Pressing "r" and "y" will reply to both addresses, "r" and "n" to just the iberia.es

Re: IMAP in Mutt

2000-02-12 Thread Brendan Cully
On Saturday, 12 February 2000 at 14:57, Scott A. McIntyre wrote: Brendan, In looking to move to Mutt for email (1.1.3i is what I'm using at the moment) I've noticed that either my own clue about Mutt, or a handy piece of functionality, is missing... The problem is that I have a LOT of

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

2000-02-12 Thread Lars Hecking
You are correct Lars, I thought he was having a problem using GPG and not the warning, DOH! I thought so too, but because the original poster's error description was unclear and incomplete, I focused on the warning part instead. Both our suggestions should help :)

Re: Adding fields to (MH) messages

2000-02-12 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 08:57:49PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote: When I use Mutt for MH folders, it adds Status and Content-Length fields to each individual message and thus changes all files, even whena you have only opened the folder and not touched any messages. When you have MH folders with