Re: Sender rejected

On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 05:33:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Dennis Robertson proclaimed on mutt-users that: offending ISP. I apologise for the inconvenience. Configuring gpg is next. Regards to all. /usr/local/doc/mutt/samples/gpg.rc (also pgp2.rc and pgp5.rc in the same

Re: Sender rejected

* Dennis Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I can't seem to get anything to work first time with mutt. I installed gnupg, copied the gpg.rc file to ~/ and tried to send a signed message to myself. copy/paste gpg.rc into your .muttrc david -- One's not half two. -- e.e.cummings

Re: mutt with S/MIME anyone done it?

2000-06-22-08:31:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Someone at work has a requirement for a command line MUA to use with S/MIME. He has to automate sending E-Mail to customers with X.509 certificates in their mail programs. He says "I think the RSA BSAFE toolkit is what I need." I've no idea whether

Why use set hostname?

Hi, I tried to set the hostname part of my outgoing mails to "cc.usu.edu" instead of my comps name. I tried it using just plain set hostname="cc.usu.edu" but that does not do it. My emails still had my comps name. So I switched to set my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. and that works

Re: Question about .Sig

Mrinal Kalakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 24 Jun 2000: Crude hack - put it in attribution: set attribution="This\nis\nmy\nmultiline\nsig!\n\n%n wrote:" Less crude, but still a hack: set attribution="\n\n`cat ~/.signature`\n\n%n wrote:" Untested, so please report whether it

gpg (was: Re: Sender rejected)

Dennis Robertson muttered: I can't seem to get anything to work first time with mutt. I installed gnupg, copied the gpg.rc file to ~/ and tried to send a signed message to myself. I get: Can't open PGP subprocess!: no such file or directory. most likely you forgot to source the file in

Re: Why use set hostname?

Gottipati Aravind: and that works just fine. My question now is whats the purpose of that hostname variable if it does not work? am I doing it wrong or do I need to set some other variable too.. to get it to work? whether you can forge your "from:" line or not depends on the mta. sendmail

Reason to upgrade

Is their a reason to upgrade from 1.2 to to 1.2.2 at this point??? -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private!

Re: Why use set hostname?

I'm sure it does work. It works for me. However, your MTA needs to be configured to leave the hostname alone if it's already present in the email. I'm using sendmail, which works fine. What are you using? I am using sendmail too. But I dont really know enough about sendmail to be

Re: Reason to upgrade

Jason Helfman writes: Is their a reason to upgrade from 1.2 to to 1.2.2 at this point??? Judging from the patches that were posted, we should see 1.2.3 soon. -- Don't let your mind wander -- it's too little to be let out alone.

Re: Suggestion: aka command

Daniel -- ...and then Daniel González Gasull said... % Hello all, and sorry for the delay. I'm in exams. I hope they've gone well! % % David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mutt users: % %aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] % % would automatically readdress any email for %

Re: Suggestion: aka command

Hi again :-) I just thought of a simpler and potentially easier answer to this whole thing. Since you've already stepped up to the work of configuring *your* environment (the aliases file) for these folks who can't get it together, why not just configure your procmail setup to recognize any of

Re: Suggestion: pgpmimeuser command

Daniel -- My, I'm busy this morning :-) ...and then Daniel González Gasull said... % Hi! :-) % % David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To Mutt users: % % You may find everything you wanted for the % pgpmimeuser setting in v1.2 and up (currently % 1.2.2 AFAIK), since there is now a clearsign

Re: [off-topic?] X-PGP- headers (was Re: Suggestion: pgpmimeuser command)

Daniel -- ...and then Daniel González Gasull said... % Hi! :-) % % Myself wrote To Mutt users: % % list to ask it, but, are there any standard email % headers to say something like this?: This was the important part of your first post, we note. % % X-PGP-Advocacy: Hey, I prefer to

Re: Why use set hostname?

Gottipati Aravind [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: --- hostname Type: string Default: "" Specifies the hostname to use after the ``@'' in local e-mail addresses. This overrides the compile time definition