On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:15:11AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Osamu Aoki proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Also, exim+procmail supports MAILDIR too.
Delivery to folders of whatever kind (MH, maildir, mbox etc) is a
job for the local delivery agent. Right - procmail does
I've finally assembled a lot of my mutt-related scripts and
configuration file information on a web page,
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/
It includes the following scripts, some of which I have previously
posted here, along with explanations of how to use them in a mailcap
file
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:47:14AM -0800, tompoe wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Rich Lafferty proclaimed on mutt-users that:
If I want the standalone that looks like the screenshots, what do I
do? Do I build an interface for it?
Huh?
the
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 15:29:16 +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
I have a large inbox archive file, that seems to be a little corrupt.
One or two odd entries and mutt will open it, but can't seem to close it
again. Is there anything to check op repair these files?
Thanks to all who
I have just been sending E-Mail and getting replies from France. The
accented characters just appear as ? in the mutt pager but they are
OK when I compose further replies using vi (I think it's elvis
actually here).
How do I get the mutt pager to understand/display accented characters
I think you have a problem with your headers. Check it out:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 27
10:18:31 2001
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:17:29 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Teodor Cimpoesu teo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
* Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just been sending E-Mail and getting replies from France. The
accented characters just appear as ? in the mutt pager but they are
OK when I compose further replies using vi (I think it's elvis
actually here).
How do I get the mutt pager to
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:36:09PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote:
* Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just been sending E-Mail and getting replies from France. The
accented characters just appear as ? in the mutt pager but they are
OK when I compose further replies using vi (I
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:21:25PM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:36:09PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote:
* Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have just been sending E-Mail and getting replies from France. The
accented characters just appear as ? in the
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:13:06AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Osamu Aoki proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Problem was I needed to add a line before successfully decoding
my Base64 coded text to binary. I was looking for better/automatic
command line scheme.
munpack
Some of my correspondents use a mail composition system that does not
break long lines into screen-width lines. I dare not complain for they
will then send me HTML or Word versions. The mutt viewer handles the
long lines nicely, breaking at word boundaries and putting in cyan plus
signs to
Suppose someone send mail from account "debian" from "localhost"
and I recieve it here in account "debian" on "localhost", it
showup as if it came from myself in my Mutt.
Is there any good way to avoid this?
Any suggestion?
Osamu
--
+ Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D
*[Dirk Laurie on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:14AM +0200]:
signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
viewer-formatted version
Hi,
Anyone have a fix for this?
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/justin/mutt-1.3.16/doc'
test -f manual.html || make manual.html || cp ./manual*.html ./
test -f manual.txt || make manual.txt || cp ./manual.txt ./
make[1]: *** No rule to make target
14 matches
Mail list logo
