I have noted a problem with the IMAP support in mutt 1.3.25i (and
earlier 1.3 versions)
When configuring mutt to use save_name with a folder directory on an
IMAP server it fails to locate the IMAP-folder for the user and ends
up saving the message in the record folder.
I have seen the following
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
| On Jan 15, Andreas Herceg [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
| On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
| | Use what I recommended, in addition to a modified $delete value (consult
| | the manual). The delete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone.
I'm about to send out a whole bunch of mails and I wondered what would
be the easiest way to ensure that they all go to the same Outbox for
easy reference.
At the moment all my stuff is saved to ~/Mail/Outbox/name_of_recipient
What do
I'm trying to do something here, maybe it's not doable - who knows?
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
send-hooks, but those do not seem to affect the current message, only
subsequent
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-01-2002 14:26]:
| I'm about to send out a whole bunch of mails and I wondered what would
| be the easiest way to ensure that they all go to the same Outbox for
| easy reference.
You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you could just issue the set
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:42:43PM +0100, René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you could just issue the set
fcc=yourOutbox command, send the mails, and reset it when you're
done.
My mutt don't know fcc, I think you meant record.
Nicolas
* On 16-01-02 at 14:47
* René Clerc said
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-01-2002 14:26]:
| I'm about to send out a whole bunch of mails and I wondered what would
| be the easiest way to ensure that they all go to the same Outbox for
| easy reference.
You mean a bunch of
Hi,
Newbie question:
Is it possible to have
set record = outbox depending on sender
thanks,
Phil.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:47:40PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:42:43PM +0100, René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
3. When I get clearer with gpg, I try to make my 'uid' more informative
for others. But I found gpg doesn't provide good maintaining method
to update them. You can not update uid except
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16-01-2002 14:49]:
| On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:42:43PM +0100, René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| You mean a bunch of separate mails? Then you could just issue the set
| fcc=yourOutbox command, send the mails, and reset it when you're
| done.
|
| My
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Philip Wittamore wrote:
Hi,
Newbie question:
Is it possible to have
set record = outbox depending on sender
thanks,
Phil.
You can use fcc-hook for setting the record folder based on the
recipient, if you're changing $from in a hook to get
* On 16-01-02 at 14:47
* René Clerc said
If all mails match a certain pattern (section 4.2 of TFM), you could
use a send-hook for this purpose, like:
send-hook ~s SUBJECT set fcc=yourOutbox
Well, I'm afraid that I'm a bit of a dummy, after much reading of TFM
I'm none the wiser.
On 020116, at 17:30:03, Nick Wilson wrote
each mail that I am sending that needs to be in a 'special' Outbox has a
subject line that starts with
att:
and I'd like then to all be in the same place.
I can't use 'set record' because I have
fcc-save-hook . =Outbox/%0
For fcc-hook
On Jan 16, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
each mail that I am sending that needs to be in a 'special' Outbox has a
subject line that starts with
att:
So some examples would be:
att: somebloke
att: somegeezer
att: somedoris
and I'd like then to all be in the same place.
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 01/15/2002:
Occasionally, I Cc an email and the recipient of the Cc assumes
that the email is directed to them (and not just copied to them).
Is it possible to add an attribution-like line similar to:
This is a copy of an email
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:36:55 -0500
From: Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: message-hooks
I'm trying to do something here, maybe it's not doable - who knows?
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:21:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
send-hooks, but those do not seem to affect the current message, only
subsequent
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using
Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background
colors are reversed in some cases. Text that was previously green on
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:21:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
what I want is that whenever I write or reply to a certain address, that
message will be automagically BCCed to another address. I tried using
send-hooks, but
On 2002.01.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't necessarily agree that mutt should spit out a message, though I
can see that this could be confusing. What I would do would be to go
...
% Feedback is an important element of any user interface, GUI or
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using
Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background
colors are
Hi,
I'am looking for tips/ideas on how to best manage subscriptions
to multiple high volume mailing lists.
Here's my current setup:
I'm subscribed to multiple lists which get seperated into
multiple incoming folders by procmail.
Every now and then I scan through the new mail for some of the
David --
...and then David Champion said...
%
% On 2002.01.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% I don't necessarily agree that mutt should spit out a message, though I
% can see that this could be confusing. What I would do would be to go
% ...
% %
On Jan 16, Thomas E. Dickey [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly
...
The Makefile says...
# In
Andreas, et al --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
% | On Jan 15, Andreas Herceg [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% | On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:57:07PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
% | | Use what I recommended, in addition to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 16-01-02 at 21:23
* Balazs Javor said
Hi,
I'am looking for tips/ideas on how to best manage subscriptions
to multiple high volume mailing lists.
Here's my current setup:
I'm subscribed to multiple lists which get seperated into
James --
...and then James Hamilton said...
%
% I usually delete a whole slue of messages at a time. For example I had ~150
messages to scan through in my inbox this morning. Most of them spam system email
etc. Can someone suggest a way to mark them for deletion then when i sync-mailbox
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Well, FWIW, I'm pretty sure he's talking about his own vendor's mutt
package (port is a BSD-ism, right?). Regular Mutt still defaults to
ncurses, and there's certainly no mention of the above text in Mutt's
Makefile.
generally (you're correct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 16-01-02 at 18:11
* Jeremy Blosser said
On Jan 16, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
each mail that I am sending that needs to be in a 'special' Outbox has a
subject line that starts with
att:
So some examples
Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
generally (you're correct there). Some porters do a good job, some
don't. Unfortunately (in contrast to Debian), FreeBSD's porters seem
to work as a mob (makes it hard to keep track of who is handling a
package).
there is generally a maintainter, no?
aura% grep
I use procmail to filter mail into several different mailboxes. Some I
need to monitor continually, while others I only want to look at once a
day or so, and others only every few days.
As I have things set up now, all these mailboxes are in my ~/Mail
directory, and mailboxes set to `echo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Lance Simmons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is there a way to control the frequency with which Mutt checks for new
mail in specific mailboxes (immediately for some important boxes,
every few hours for others, every couple of days for others)?
Hey people.
I know Mutt does not deliver mail, but Rogers just switched to requiring
smtp authentication and I'd prefer to smarthost through them. Is anyone aware
of an smtp server that does authentication?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG pub key:
Hey all.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:58:06PM -0700,([-30]7867.09) in a galaxy far far away, Gary
Johnson muttered on the list:
There is a list of scripts to do just that at
http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/
under External Address Query Scripts. I adapted one of them,
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I know Mutt does not deliver mail, but Rogers just switched to
requiring smtp authentication and I'd prefer to smarthost through
them. Is anyone aware of an smtp server that does authentication?
sendmail, i'm pretty sure does (i know cause i'm dealing with trying
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:05:24PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Is there a way to control the frequency with which Mutt checks for new
mail in specific mailboxes
I'm not aware of a native way, but I had toyed with the idea of
adjusting the value of $mailboxes based on the time of
I'll give it a shot, but as I understand it, according to RFC 2554, any
MTA that receives an authenticated email will forward that authentication. So,
is there a way to get Mutt to send an authenticated email to my local server?
I found a page on doing this with Exim as well, but I'm
On 16:03 16 Jan 2002, Lance Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I use procmail to filter mail into several different mailboxes. Some I
| need to monitor continually, while others I only want to look at once a
| day or so, and others only every few days.
|
| As I have things set up now, all these
I'm using mutt 1.2.5 on Solaris 8 Intel. It works fine. I'm using
ncurses 5.2 with it. I see color and everything.
However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure I compiled it with
ncurses support. However, upon launch I get a bunch of errors that the
color 'default' is not defined:
Error
further to my last post, here's a sample of my .muttrc:
color signature brightred default
color tilde blue default
color tree brightmagenta default
color underline yellow default
color body yellow default [;:]-[)/(|] # colorise smileys
color body
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Well, this isn't strictly an in mutt solution, but I don't use
$mailboxes to monitor email. Instead my procmail recipe runs a small
shell script when delivering to particular folders, and that script
writes a line to a file I'm monitoring in a small
Carl B . Constantine wrote:
However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure I compiled it with
ncurses support. However, upon launch I get a bunch of errors that the
color 'default' is not defined:
Error in /home/cconstan/.muttrc, line 326: default: no such color
Error in
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:12:40PM -0800, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
I'm using mutt 1.2.5 on Solaris 8 Intel. It works fine. I'm using
ncurses 5.2 with it. I see color and everything.
However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure I compiled it with
ncurses support. However, upon
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:25:54PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
i'm using the sunfreeware ncurses:
...which is perhaps a problem in itself (I've several reports that this
package is installed with conflicting names versus the Solaris curses
library).
imho, that package should be deleted.
--
On 16/01/02, from the brain of Knute tumbled:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Well, this isn't strictly an in mutt solution, but I don't use
$mailboxes to monitor email. Instead my procmail recipe runs a small
shell script when delivering to particular folders, and that script
* Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:12:40PM -0800, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
I'm using mutt 1.2.5 on Solaris 8 Intel. It works fine. I'm using
ncurses 5.2 with it. I see color and everything.
However, I today compiled mutt 1.3.25 and made sure I
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:57:11AM +0100, Marco van Lienen wrote:
When I run the ldap query perl script, I get:
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: No such attribute
ldapsearch failed:
Try invoking ldapsearch with a -x switch. This tells it to not try and
bind using sasl authentication.
On 17:49 16 Jan 2002, Michael Montagne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| Well, this isn't strictly an in mutt solution, but I don't use
| $mailboxes to monitor email. Instead my procmail recipe runs a small
| shell script when delivering to particular
Very nice. Now I just need to figure out how to get it all set up in my
environment! ;)
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 17:49 16 Jan 2002, Michael Montagne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| Well, this isn't strictly an in mutt solution,
49 matches
Mail list logo
