On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:06:43PM -0700, Michael Elkins said:
try this instead:
folder-hook jimp 'set attribution=On %d, %n babbled:'
note the extra quotes around the 'body' of the folder-hook. this is
necessary to prevent the expansion of the at the time the folder-hook
command is
Hi
You should probably look into how lynx works, since it's all going to be
handled from that side. It's not really a mutt question.
ok!
You might also search the archives, which you can find noted on mutt.org,
for mention of muttzilla, which configures Netscape/Mozilla to use mutt
as its
Hi,
* Rob Summers [05/14/02 07:47:56 CEST] wrote:
I am setting the attribution globally in my muttrc with this:
set attribution=On %d, %n said:
This works correctly, when I try to change it in a folder-hook is when the
problem occurs.
I'm setting the attribution in the folder-hook like
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:27:43AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
modern keyboards and tty drivers easily can tell the two apart.
That's not always true. Look at the output of stty -a if it contains
something like erase=^H then your Backspacekey (if it's working) is
producing ^H.
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-14 00.12 +0100]:
Hi,
Hello!
I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command to work properly in my .muttrc
file.
The current settings I have look as follows:
save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
save-hook bugtraq +bugtraq-list
Hmm. I'm not
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:23:38AM +0200, Wojciech Krygier wrote:
Just in case it might be helpful: bind editor \ch backward-char works
fine here, even without unbinding its previous action, so it seems that
it isn't mutt fault. I would check the terminal definitions instead. Try
console
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/14/02 06:02]:
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 23:14]:
I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command
to work properly in my .muttrc file.
The current settings I have look as follows:
save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
save-hook bugtraq
Hi!
I have a little problem with my folder-hook. I want to change my folder
variable when I change to my IMAP mailbox. My intetion was to see all
my IMAP directories when I press c. So here is my folder-hook:
folder-hook [Mm]ail 'set folder = ~/Mail'
folder-hook [Mm]ail 'set record =
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Martin Karlsson wrote:
Hmm. I'm not sure it works that way. Look for something specific in
the mail (just like when writing a procmail recipe). I have:
save-hook ~h owner-mutt-users +s.mutt-users
save-hook (~f pal1|~f pal2) +s.pal1_and_2
The ~h
Hello again,
I'm trying to figure out how sorting is really done in Mutt. I
currently have sort=threads. I thought that would sort by threads, and
then by date. For example, some of my folder have no threads at all,
and I'd like those sorted by date (received). Below is the a snip of
Hi Christopher,
How might one go about fixing this on my end? I have a feeling that
a procmail recipe that uses a sed filter for the Subject: line might
do the trick. Can anyone suggest a recipe, or perhaps a simpler
mutt-centric solution?
you might try something like this:
#
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mutters,
One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager
software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all
the messages send out. Unlike most list manager software,
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:03:19PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
* Mike Arrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-14 14:00]:
Hello again,
I'm trying to figure out how sorting is really done in Mutt.
I currently have sort=threads. I thought that would sort by threads,
and then by
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley wrote:
Mutters,
One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager
software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all
the messages send out. Unlike most list manager software, which
puts the
OK, I'm fairly certain that this should be possible, but
for some reason I can't figure out how to do it; any advice would be
appreciated. What I'm trying to do is implement the following logic:
If I'm in either folder =inbox or folder =pending
and if I'm not replying to a message
Christopher Swingley wrote:
So does this mean that the decoding I mentioned above would need to be
built into mutt? I don't know how much one-off kludging there is
inside mutt to fix non-standard behavior in other parts of the email
conversation, but this one probably wouldn't be too hard
Hi all.
I'm having some problems with TMDA confirmation messages. When I hit
'r' to reply the messages, the To: field not show the correct address
(Reply-To), instead it shows the To: address of the original message.
In the example below, when i hit 'r' i saw To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:23:38AM +0200, Wojciech Krygier wrote:
Just in case it might be helpful: bind editor \ch backward-char works
fine here, even without unbinding its previous action, so it seems that
it isn't mutt fault. I would check the terminal definitions instead. Try
console
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:29:30PM -0400, Sweth Chandramouli wrote:
This leads me to believe that send-hook is applied before
the full message is built, and more specifically before the headers
against which I'm matching are available (or maybe only certain headers
are passed in to the
On 14/05/02 Christopher Swingley did speaketh:
I hate Lyris. Lyris is so nonstandard that one would think it was a
Microsoft in-house project.
I'm right there with you.
Me too. They set up Lyris in-house here, and I've ignored the project and
put up my own GNU Mailman server instead.
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:35:50PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
I just received a message with this header:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It contained the following line:
Since you92re a WebPosition customer,
where 92 is how it looks when I less the Maildir file.
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-14 21:01]:
I'm having some problems with TMDA confirmation messages. When I hit
'r' to reply the messages, the To: field not show the correct address
(Reply-To), instead it shows the To: address of the original message.
In the example below, when
* Matthias Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 20:08]:
I want to use Mutt with Lynx. I want that mutt start whenever
i click on a emailadress in lynx. How can i do that?
the text browser links allows you to simply
set mutt %s to use with mailto links. easy!
lynx may allow it, too, but i
* Mike Arrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 10:36]:
Having come from pine, I'm used to html mail being rendered
by lynx or links or something automatically. When I view an
html mail in Mutt, it says [-- text/html is unsupported
(use 'v' to view this part) --]. Is there something I
can do
Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-14 21:01]:
I'm having some problems with TMDA confirmation messages. When I hit
'r' to reply the messages, the To: field not show the correct address
(Reply-To), instead it shows the To: address of the
Hi,
I am trying to use mutt to connect to a mailserver and receive/send
mails. I have configured
mutt for pop and I am albe to connect to the mailserver, access my
mailbox and view my
mails. However, I am not able to send mails from my system. From what
I have read, I
believe mutt internally
You cannot have sendmail and ssmail listening on port 25. only one or the other.
fetchmail doesn't have to pass mail off to a MTA like sendmail. It can be configured
to pass mail directly to a MDA like procmail. If you're using the built in pop
capabilities of mutt, you really don't need
27 matches
Mail list logo
