That's probably more information than you needed, but maybe that helps
you understand why mutt is doing what it's doing.
No, Kyle, the information was useful. Thank you.
Hmm. Okay, I have a better idea of *what* you're doing, but still not
*why* you're doing it. Is this large and complex
* Haines Brown on Friday, May 08, 2009 at 07:28:39 -0400
Sorry to have dragged things off topic, but in short, my immediate
question was resolved, which is that I can name a message whatever I
want and subsequently move it from ~/Mail to where I want it. I work
on material in terms of their
Michael Tatge wrote:
If by mini-index you mean pager_index_lines. Then no, the mini-index is
what you see in the index. No way to get different colors for that.
HTH,
Michael
Yes, that was what I meant. Thanks for clearing that up. I guess I could use
fewer lines in pager_index_lines to
When I start mutt -y to read the mbox mails, mutt always sort them by
alphabetic sequence, can I configure its sorting method to fit my preference?
--
Hi,
Wu, Yue
++ 08/05/09 20:35 +0800 - Wu, Yue:
When I start mutt -y to read the mbox mails, mutt always sort them by
alphabetic sequence, can I configure its sorting method to fit my preference?
I guess http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#sort is what you
are looking for?
--
Rejo Zenger .
Is there a way to design multiple color rules for incoming mail in the index? I
want to have all new mail green, for instance, and if the mail belongs to a
known mailing list, color it as yellow after it has been read.
Currently, I can color mail yellow with ~l, and new mail green with ~N, but I
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:31:11PM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 08/05/09 21:09 +0800 - Wu, Yue:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 08/05/09 20:35 +0800 - Wu, Yue:
When I start mutt -y to read the mbox mails, mutt always sort them by
alphabetic sequence, can I
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the mbox's N
mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails in it or not, not
what I think preference for me. Can I configure it? I have set the mark_old=no
--
Hi,
Wu, Yue
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 10:19]:
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the
mbox's N mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails
in it or not, not what I think preference for me. Can I configure it?
I have set the mark_old=no
Then you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 8 at 10:56 AM, quoth Eric Patton:
Is there a way to design multiple color rules for incoming mail in
the index? I want to have all new mail green, for instance, and if
the mail belongs to a known mailing list, color it as yellow
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 10:19]:
Currently, I find that if I enter to a mbox, then quit from it, the
mbox's N mark will be removed, no matter whether there are news mails
in it or not, not what I think preference
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Thus, list messages will only be yellow if they aren't new, because if
they're new, they match both rules, and the last one wins.
Of course, you can always make complex patterns. For example:
color index yellow default '~l ! ~N'
Does that help?
Yes, this last
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 8 at 12:23 PM, quoth Eric Patton:
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Thus, list messages will only be yellow if they aren't new, because if
they're new, they match both rules, and the last one wins.
Of course, you can always make complex
* Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com [05-08-09 12:21]:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 11:20]:
No, just new emails remain the new mark, but the mbox that contains
them not.
Ah, then you must correct those that have already been marked O.
t~O;N
return
My bad, sb: T~0;N
Hi,
* Eric Patton wrote:
Does '~l ! ~N' mean 'color list mail yellow if it is not new', or...?
Yepp. Please start reading at:
http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#complex-patterns
It's about searching, but mutt uses the same pattern syntax for coloring.
Rocco
* El 07/05/09 a las 23:24, Kyle Wheeler chamullaba:
On Thursday, May 7 at 09:40 PM, quoth Luis A. Florit:
On Monday, May 4 at 05:05 PM, quoth Luis A. Florit:
I use a ISO-8859-1 encoded xterm in maemo, but :set ?charset
gives me charset=utf-8.
Are you setting it in your config
Hello,
I have a mystery that I'm trying to solve to no avail. mutt-1.5.19 is
running on OpenBSD 4.5, --with-idn. I got a little sample XML (utf-8)
encoded file that I'm trying to send as attachment. When I attach it,
mutt correctly identifies it: [text/plain, 8bit, utf-8, 0.3K], since
there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Friday, May 8 at 06:08 PM, quoth Luis A. Florit:
But I have three charsets:
$charset=//TRANSLIT
?charset=utf-8
What? That doesn't make any sense. Are those two lines actually in
your muttrc?
The only thing in my .muttrc is 'set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Friday, May 8 at 03:00 PM, quoth Aaron S.:
I have a mystery that I'm trying to solve to no avail.
Hopefully we can help!
I got a little sample XML (utf-8) encoded file that I'm trying to
send as attachment. When I attach it, mutt correctly
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:04:42PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, May 8 at 03:00 PM, quoth Aaron S.:
I have a mystery that I'm trying to solve to no avail.
Hopefully we can help!
I got a little sample XML (utf-8) encoded file that I'm trying to
send as attachment. When I
Well, I just captured smtp session of loopback interface (same box where
mutt is running). Here is the relevant part:
03d0: 746f 3e38 353c 2f74 6f3e 0d0a 0909 093c to85/to.
03e0: 7265 6164 3e21 d091 e288 9ae2 9591 3c2f read!п.Б..Б../
03f0:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 18:26]:
Do you me I should fix it manually?
:^), yes
From the manpage of muttrc, it says mark_old is for:
Controls whether or not mutt marks new unread messages as old if you
exit a mailbox without reading them.
So it's for message, not for
On 2009-05-08, Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com wrote:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 18:26]:
Do you me I should fix it manually?
:^), yes
From the manpage of muttrc, it says mark_old is for:
Controls whether or not mutt marks new unread messages as old if you
* Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com [05-08-09 19:57]:
I don't think this is Wu Yue's problem, Patrick. I could be wrong,
but as I understand him, he is opening a mailbox, leaving some of
the messages unread, then changing to another mailbox, then checking
to see which mailboxes contain new
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 07:37:45PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 18:26]:
From the manpage of muttrc, it says mark_old is for:
Controls whether or not mutt marks new unread messages as old if you
exit a mailbox without reading them.
So it's
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:53:50PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
I don't think this is Wu Yue's problem, Patrick. I could be wrong,
but as I understand him, he is opening a mailbox, leaving some of
the messages unread, then changing to another mailbox, then checking
to see which mailboxes
* Wu, Yue vano...@gmail.com [05-08-09 20:26]:
It more likely is that he expects a folder with new mail to have the
N flag for the folder which contains new mail but not newer than his
last access to that folder.
No, I expect the N flag always there, no matter the access time, if
has
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:17:37PM +0800, Wu, Yue wrote:
No, just new emails remain the new mark, but the mbox that contains them not.
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I could be totally off the mark here, but I believe the problem is
mutt's interpretation of
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:34:14PM -0700, zion wrote:
Well, I just captured smtp session of loopback interface (same box where
mutt is running). Here is the relevant part:
03d0: 746f 3e38 353c 2f74 6f3e 0d0a 0909 093c to85/to.
03e0: 7265 6164 3e21 d091 e288 9ae2 9591 3c2f
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:15:47PM EDT, John J. Foster wrote:
I could be totally off the mark here, but I believe the problem is
mutt's interpretation of new mail vs. your (and my) interpretation of
new mail (unread mail). I have always believed, and still do, that
unread mail is the same as
30 matches
Mail list logo
