Re: Mailing list status

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:59:45PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:05:47PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:39:47PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > OSUOSL is making some adjustments to the lists right now (to fix the > > > errant

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Bastian wrote: > On 14Mar18 12:48 +, David Woodfall wrote: > > I couldn't find how to do that, apart from actually finding the file > > and attaching it that way. When I pressed 'a' to attach and then '?' > > for a list I had a list of my folders up,

Re: Mailing list status

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote: > What I use for procmail (if anyone finds it useful): > > :0 > * ^List-Post: .*mutt-users@mutt.org > .mutt-users/ > > :0 > * ^List-Post: .*mutt-us...@osuosl.org > .mutt-users/ Don't forget to escape your literal dots

Re: View HTML without autoview

On (14/03/18 16:01), Ian Zimmerman put forth the proposition: On 2018-03-14 13:13, David Woodfall wrote: > Previously, I used elinks and it works fine with autoview, however > when I try to pipe to it it also renders the headers instead of just > the body. When you

Re: View HTML without autoview

On 2018-03-14 13:13, David Woodfall wrote: > > Previously, I used elinks and it works fine with autoview, however > > when I try to pipe to it it also renders the headers instead of just > > the body. When you try a pipe, is that piping the message (as a pipe command would do in the index view)

Re: View HTML without autoview

On (14/03/18 23:23), Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition: On (14/03/18 16:01), Ian Zimmerman put forth the proposition: On 2018-03-14 13:13, David Woodfall wrote: Previously, I used elinks and it works fine with autoview, however when I try

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On (14/03/18 12:01), Scott Kostyshak put forth the proposition: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:48:56PM +, David Woodfall wrote: I have recently been in a discussion with a tech support person about some emails that I have been receiving and I was asked to attach one of

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:48:56PM +, David Woodfall wrote: > I have recently been in a discussion with a tech support person about > some emails that I have been receiving and I was asked to attach one > of them to a test email that she sent me. > > I couldn't find how to do that, apart from

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On 2018-03-14, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I have no idea if the following is good advice or not, but I'll mention > it and let you investigate, unless the other method works well for you. > > You can "bounce" an email with the "b" key. [...] I've found that another

Re: what does the leading - mean in the attachment view?

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:29:41PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > Just out of curious: in the attachment view (of the compose view), there are > some attachments with a - before them: > > --- > - I1 /path/to/file1 [text/plain, 7

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On 2018-03-15 00:37, Erik Christiansen wrote: > Yup, forward: > View the email to attach. > Hit 'f', and mutt will prompt: Forward as attachment? ([yes]/no): > Hit Enter, compose the accompanying email, with forward address, > etc. I just tried this (both with an individual message as well as

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On 14.03.18 12:48, David Woodfall wrote: > I have recently been in a discussion with a tech support person about > some emails that I have been receiving and I was asked to attach one > of them to a test email that she sent me. > > I couldn't find how to do that, apart from actually finding the

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On 14Mar18 12:48 +, David Woodfall wrote: > I couldn't find how to do that, apart from actually finding the file > and attaching it that way. When I pressed 'a' to attach and then '?' > for a list I had a list of my folders up, but mutt wouldn't let me enter > them and gave a 'couldn't attach

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On (15/03/18 00:37), Erik Christiansen put forth the proposition: On 14.03.18 12:48, David Woodfall wrote: I have recently been in a discussion with a tech support person about some emails that I have been receiving and I was asked to attach one of them to a test

Re: Reply with another email as attachment?

On (14/03/18 14:22), Bastian put forth the proposition: On 14Mar18 12:48 +, David Woodfall wrote: I couldn't find how to do that, apart from actually finding the file and attaching it that way. When I pressed 'a' to attach and then '?' for a list I had a list of

View HTML without autoview

I've just found reason to not autoview HTML and to do it manually with a bind. Previously, I used elinks and it works fine with autoview, however when I try to pipe to it it also renders the headers instead of just the body. This is my mailcap: text/html;elinks

Re: View HTML without autoview

On (14/03/18 12:53), Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition: I've just found reason to not autoview HTML and to do it manually with a bind. Previously, I used elinks and it works fine with autoview, however when I try to pipe to it it also renders the headers instead of

Reply with another email as attachment?

I have recently been in a discussion with a tech support person about some emails that I have been receiving and I was asked to attach one of them to a test email that she sent me. I couldn't find how to do that, apart from actually finding the file and attaching it that way. When I pressed 'a'

Re: Mailing list status

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:23:13AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: >:0 >* ^List-Post: .*mutt-users@(osuosl|mutt)\.org >.mutt-users/ Thanks Will, I was hoping to get this back from my mail :) --strk;