On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 12:38:25PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> On 2019-09-06 10:50, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>
> > Both "new" and "old" are "unread". "read" means neither new nor old.
>
> That sounds familiar. I think that goes back about 40 years, long before
> Mutt, to how spooling of
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 07:50:36AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
If you have both "new" and "old" messages in the mailbox and want to
clear both of them (marking them as read), I would suggest using
something like
~UO
Clearing "old" will actually set both "new" and "old" messages to
On 07Sep2019 02:22, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-09-07, Italo Penna wrote:
I'm a UNIX user trying to move from a GUI email ( Thunderbird ) to
mutt.
However most of company employers are MS Outlook users and, as expected,
all them send html emails with tons of awkward stuff like tables,
Hi folks,
I'm a UNIX user trying to move from a GUI email ( Thunderbird ) to mutt.
However most of company employers are MS Outlook users and, as expected,
all them send html emails with tons of awkward stuff like tables,
in-line images and meetings appointments .
I'm using vim as editor
On 2019-09-07, Italo Penna wrote:
> I'm a UNIX user trying to move from a GUI email ( Thunderbird ) to mutt.
> However most of company employers are MS Outlook users and, as expected,
> all them send html emails with tons of awkward stuff like tables,
> in-line images and meetings
On 2019-09-06 10:50, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Both "new" and "old" are "unread". "read" means neither new nor old.
That sounds familiar. I think that goes back about 40 years, long before
Mutt, to how spooling of incoming messages was implemented, and the
introduction of the non-standard
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 03:23:05PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
I've some confusion about "read" and "unread" versus "old" and "new".
There are status flags for new and old. Unread messages seem to be
new, but if I read a message it doesn't acquire an "(O)ld" flag,
though it loses its
