Re: suggestion for sender-hook

1999-12-03 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 15:51 -0600 02 Dec 1999, Ronny Haryanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still find it not trivial to do this: "If I am sending the message as user@host, regardless of in which folder I am, then do this and that". How are you modifying the From header? If you're using reverse name, send-hooks

s(ave) default mbox

1999-12-03 Thread Jan Houtsma
If i receive an email from say person 'xxx' and i wanna save that message i press 's'. This defaults to mailbox '=xxx'. Can i change this default in muttrc that any email from person 'xxx' should always be going to mailbox '=school' ?? thanks, jan

Re: Odd problem when bouncing a message from an IMAP server

1999-12-03 Thread Chris Green
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 04:54:19PM +, Chris Green wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 1999-12-02 15:20:54 +, Chris Green wrote: I've found out that the same occurs when bouncing messages from other non-inbox folders on my local drive.

Re: s(ave) default mbox

1999-12-03 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jan Houtsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 03 Dec 1999: Can i change this default in muttrc that any email from person 'xxx' should always be going to mailbox '=school' ?? save-hook xxx =school Or something like that, read the manual for more info on save-hooks. Regards, Mikko -- // Mikko

Re: s(ave) default mbox

1999-12-03 Thread Jan Houtsma
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Jan Houtsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 03 Dec 1999: Can i change this default in muttrc that any email from person 'xxx' should always be going to mailbox '=school' ?? save-hook xxx =school Thanks! Or something like

Re: index colors

1999-12-03 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 04:05:49PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Subject: this is the subject ^^^ this is highlighted This is yet another concept from the ones discussed above. Just so we keep track of what's being talked about, there

send_charset does not work for Subject line

1999-12-03 Thread Marius Gedminas
Scenario (Mutt-1.1.1i): set charset=iso-8859-13 set send_charset=iso-8859-4 I send a letter to myself and include some iso-8859-13 characters both in the body and in the Subject line. I get these headers: Subject: =?iso-8859-13?Q?skipped?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4

Re: send_charset does not work for Subject line

1999-12-03 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-12-03 13:58:34 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: I send a letter to myself and include some iso-8859-13 characters both in the body and in the Subject line. I get these headers: Subject: =?iso-8859-13?Q?skipped?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4 Now the bug is this:

Re: s(ave) default mbox

1999-12-03 Thread Charles Curley
Yes, it's a very lame excuse. Some of us also barely have time to read a newspaper, never mind do your research for you. I for one would like to see some evidence that you have done a bit of research before you ask the list. Also, while we are on netiquette, I would appreciate it if people would

Re: s(ave) default mbox

1999-12-03 Thread Jan Houtsma
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 05:56:47AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: Yes, it's a very lame excuse. Some of us also barely have time to read a newspaper, never mind do your research for you. I for one would like to see some evidence that you have done a bit of research before you ask the list. off

Re: Multiple Personalities

1999-12-03 Thread Raymond A. Meijer
On Thu, 02 Dec 1999, 18:44, Robert Chien wrote: Hi Robert, Now when I reply to a message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the custom headers (From, Reply-To and Organization) and other settings for [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be used. Check out section 4.4 on "Using Hooks"

Bug report on mutt 1.0

1999-12-03 Thread Peter van der Zanden
Hello, I just compiled and installed mutt 1.0 (upgrading from mutt 1.0pre4) and discovered a small bug in the use of colors. The 'default' color is not recognized anymore. As a result, a lot of color settings I use are now considered invallid :( Below you find the output of 'mutt -v' for mutt

An error in the manual

1999-12-03 Thread Marius Gedminas
The manual says: To subscribe to one of the following mailing lists, send a message with the word subscribe in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^^ Majordomo says: Commands must be in message BODY, not in HEADER. Commands in the "Subject:"

Happy with mutt, but...

1999-12-03 Thread Zsombor Gergely
Hello, I have just downloaded and compiled the newest version of mutt and gpg. They work fine together, but I was not able to configure everything well. I am Hungarian, so I would like to use accented letters (8 bit). I inserted set allow_8bit and set charset="iso-8859-2" into .muttrc, but

Re: A hook for a separate compose window?

1999-12-03 Thread Tom Weckström
Hi, Thanks for your help, folks. This doesn't seem to be as simple as I thought. The ''A'' - trick is a good way to go around this. Is Mutt a "stateful" program in such a sense, that when writing a message, you can not do anything else with the "folder index" view? What a about changing the

Re: Happy with mutt, but...

1999-12-03 Thread Brian
The second is gpg (but is not gpg specific). I am sending my mail from my laptop (sendmail), but receiving it from a POP3 server via fetchmail/procmail. To be able to read my own messages, I have to encrypt them to myself. I do it by adding a my_hdr bcc line to .muttrc, but feel that this

Re: suggestion for sender-hook

1999-12-03 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 03-Dec-1999, Aaron Schrab wrote: At 15:51 -0600 02 Dec 1999, Ronny Haryanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still find it not trivial to do this: "If I am sending the message as user@host, regardless of in which folder I am, then do this and that". How are you modifying the From header? If

slightly off topic: reformatting rude mail

1999-12-03 Thread Timothy Ball
Anyone got a way to reformat mail so that it's 80 cols? I figured this was a common problem and someone would have a pre-made solution. --timball -- Send mail with subject "send pgp key" for public key. pub 1024R/CFF85605 1999-06-10 Timothy L. Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key

Re: slightly off topic: reformatting rude mail

1999-12-03 Thread Scott Scriven
* Timothy Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone got a way to reformat mail so that it's 80 cols? I figured this was a common problem and someone would have a pre-made solution. Yup. Many good text editors have this functionality. I use jed, and wrap text at 64 characters, which is the width

Re: slightly off topic: reformatting rude mail

1999-12-03 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 02:29:36PM -0600, Timothy Ball wrote: Anyone got a way to reformat mail so that it's 80 cols? I figured this was a common problem and someone would have a pre-made solution. I use 'par' as my parameter formatting tool, which is very fancy and does all the jobs you