On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:13:59PM -0500 or thereabouts, John P. Verel wrote:
I am trying to understand how the status indicator in the folder list
(if I'm using the term correctly), gets updated to show new mail in a
folder.
I've got a half dozen folders created by procmail. My
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 12 Mar 2000:
I dunno from message/partial, but did you try piping all of the segments
thru good old munpack?
Getting punpack (which I didn't have installed on my workstation),
tagging all the parts, setting pipe-split, and piping to "munpack -t"
did
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my system man pages to
learn about. I'd always seen that step as "fsck" and "more" :-)
It's GNU Assembler if I remember right... I've actually heard of one
GNU Assembler is
GASP is a preprocessor for assembly programs and is a part of binutils package.
Raju
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:36:40AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my
On 2000-03-12 16:24:27 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
No, they use special kind of wildcards, it's not even shell
globbing. For them the rules are:
- "*" is a special entry which means "all headers"
- "something-" means that every header which starts with
"something-", eg. "ignore X-"
-
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
Can anyone come up with an explanation for this? I can't.
Me either. Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
Well, I suppose, I should first see if I can reproduce the problem on
my system. If I have free time later today I
I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
jm
--
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:11:16PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
Can anyone come up with an explanation for this? I can't.
Me either. Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
Well, I suppose, I should first see if I can
Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
and the usual mirror sites, see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that
J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
With the previous-entry or next-entry functions perhaps? They're
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
later that week.
Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
--
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:14:59PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted
Is there a way to list the number of messages that are in a folder when
listing the folders? (Checking the format strings in the manual doesn't
seem to indicate so, but I may have overlooked the right place.) Even an
indicator of which folders have old messages would be nice. I'm using mutt
1.0
On Monday, 13 March 2000 at 20:03, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
and the usual mirror sites, see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
later that week.
A pgp6.rc file to use PGP 6 with
On 2000-03-13 16:03:43 -0500, Brendan Cully wrote:
I've got a bug report from Rex Walters that read-only
mailboxes on IMAP override ACLs incorrectly.
Specifically, if a mailbox is readonly you can't set or
unset the Seen flag, even if you have permission to
according to the ACL.
What you
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 09:24:00PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
That's good news! I've had to hack the configure script of previous
releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
on my HP-UX 10.20 system. Is this still necessary?
Peter Poeml [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can also go to the message just above the deleted one, and press
'u'. Will not work when there is no undeleted mail above or when
there are too many other deleted mails above, though.
This is really just a side-effect of the undelete operation, and
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 10:26:09AM -0800, Drew Bloechl wrote:
OS: Debian woody (Linux 2.2.13, i386)
mutt 1.1.5
MTA is Postfix 19991231.
Delivering to mailboxes with Procmail using locking rules.
FS is ext2.
Duh. I didn't know I had to specify them with "mailboxes". I feel
stupid
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
system. Is this still necessary?
I've never had trouble with the --with-slang or --with-curses configure
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:09:55PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:14:34PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
system. Is this still necessary?
I've never
CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
Hhm, yes, I remember seeing this before :)
One other thing: mutt has to be built with GNU make. The standard SysV
UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.
Details? I, too, have seen problems, but with
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:19:29AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
One other thing: mutt has to be built with GNU make. The standard SysV
UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.
Details? I, too, have seen problems, but with BSD makes.
Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of
Correction: my mistake. I forgot shifted-J and K are different.
Thanks.
jm
--
-
Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-
I understand that the C, T, and + symbols help identify when a message
is also addressed to me specifically. However, a couple of messages
lately have not correctly shown bme to be recipients. Now, i changed
my from header a couple of times trying to get it exactly how i
wanted. How can i
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Navigate using upper-case letters 'J' and 'K'.
Navigating isn't the problem, it's when i want to go to a message i
just deleted. Is there any way besides typing the
In poking around the mutt manual, I discovered that a) opening mutt
with the -y switch opens the directory browser with (apparently)
updated N indicator. Alternatively, pressing the tab key while in the
directory browser will do the same.
Over the next couple days, I intend to try some XWindow
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:16:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Sorry about that. I didn't see the new messages in the other thread
until after I sent that. I've got to
Could someone please verify whether or not the attached
pgp6.rc works? (Replace pgp6 by pgp!)
On 2000-03-13 22:10:26 +0100, Gero Treuner wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 22:10:26 +0100
From: Gero Treuner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out -
30 matches
Mail list logo
