On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
Daniel --
I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
for the 'alias' setting?
I am so used to the term 'alias' because I've always
Could you please persuade your mutt to produce a
References: Header?
Thanks in advance
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
PGP signature
On 2000-06-21 00:51:05 -0400, David T-G wrote:
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% Mutt-1.2.2 is on its way to the FTP archive under
Woo hoo! Thanks!
Um, when did 1.2.1 come out? I've had my eyes peeled for the
announcement for quite a while now...
Me2.
Btw: Is
On 2000-06-21 11:57:40 +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
Um, when did 1.2.1 come out? I've had my eyes peeled for the
announcement for quite a while now...
Me2.
That was one or two days ago. It seems the announcement
didn't make it to mutt-announce.
On 2000-06-21 21:13:10 +1000, CaT wrote:
Bug still there.
*sigh* I hoped to have that one fixed. At least, it
appeared to be from my own tests.
Just a question: Did mutt leave any temporary files behind
which could be used to reconstruct the mail folder?
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:37:45PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-06-21 21:13:10 +1000, CaT wrote:
Bug still there.
*sigh* I hoped to have that one fixed. At least, it
appeared to be from my own tests.
Just a question: Did mutt leave any temporary files behind
which could be
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-06-21 13:37:45 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
*sigh* I hoped to have that one fixed. At least, it
appeared to be from my own tests.
Please try the attached patch. The error I made was
incredibly stupid.
Well
On 21/06/00 22:29 +1000, Dennis Robertson typed:
Send yourself mail to create a mailbox :)
~$ echo 'hello world'|mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did that.
See that mutt is looking for the mailboxes ... add the mailboxes line
mailboxes $MAIL =mailbox1 =mailbox2 ...
Did that.
Did it work?
You
At 10:35 AM 6/21/00 +0100, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
Daniel --
I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
for the 'alias' setting?
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
Um, when did 1.2.1 come out? I've had my eyes peeled for the
announcement for quite a while now...
That was one or two days ago. It seems the announcement
didn't make it to mutt-announce.
I definitely remember approving it.
Brett Coon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
Hmm, to the extent that MH format is like Maildir, my experience
is contrary to your claim that saving changes is faster in a
one-message-per-file format. I found that closing mutt took
several times longer with MH than
Stan Ryckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
This is sort of a guess as well, since I'm going from memory, but
what I think was asked.
My understanding was that he wanted to specify the "display name" for
several mail addresses, in the mail folder view. This is what
I'm using mutt on Redhat linux 6.2:
Mutt 1.2i (2000-05-09)
Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for
On 2000-06-21 13:37:45 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
*sigh* I hoped to have that one fixed. At least, it
appeared to be from my own tests.
Please try the attached patch. The error I made was
incredibly stupid.
Index: mbox.c
Martin Schröder [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Btw: Is http://www.mutt.org/news.html maintained anymore? The
lastest entry is for 1.0pre4 :-}
That's because everything from then on has been listed on the index page.
news.html only contains stuff that's been archived from the index page,
which is
Just grabbed 1.2.2i and did the install. Everything appeared to work
well but mutt seg faults on invocation. I've been tracking the
releases fairly closely and this is the first time I've had a problem.
Going back to 1.2i and doing a make install gets me back to working.
System is a base Red
Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Martin Schröder [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Btw: Is http://www.mutt.org/news.html maintained anymore? The
lastest entry is for 1.0pre4 :-}
That's because everything from then on has been listed on the index page.
news.html only contains stuff
On 2000-06-21 10:13:03 -0400, Daniel Monjar wrote:
Just grabbed 1.2.2i and did the install. Everything
appeared to work well but mutt seg faults on
invocation.
Have you recently upgraded your libc?
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 10:13:03AM -0400, Daniel Monjar [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
Just grabbed 1.2.2i and did the install. Everything appeared to work
well but mutt seg faults on invocation.
I'm running on Solaris 8 without imap/ssl and it works without
any noticable problems, except for a
Anand Buddhdev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
This morning I received a message which had 130 recipients (myself
included) all in the To: header. I wanted to send my reply to all 130
recipients, so I used the 'g' key to do a group-reply. However, after
composing my message, I
After upgrading from 0.95.1 to 1.2, I'm seeing a lot of
"Lock count exceeded, remove lock for folder?" errors. This happens
most consistantly with my postponed messages folder, but I've been able
to reproduce it with other folders as well.
What typically happens is: while at the index for
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:48:29PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 19 Jun
2000:
" ^^ Gauthier Vandemoortele "
| (_/°°-ç[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| | \_`-" |
|
On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
single slash, I get this:
[...]
It seems to swallow the first slash.
Please try the attached patch.
Index: muttlib.c
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 05:19:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
single slash, I get this:
[...]
It seems to swallow the first slash.
At 11:02 PM EDT on June 20 Charles Curley sent off:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 07:24:18PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
I've started using emacs as editor for mutt. I'm specified it in the muttrc
file and also have setup a script file(e-lisp) in /home/me/.mutt called
post.el which is a package
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:20:07PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
This morning I received a message which had 130 recipients (myself
included) all in the To: header. I wanted to send my reply to all 130
recipients, so I used the 'g' key to do a group-reply. However, after
composing my
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:45:32PM -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 05:19:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
single slash, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:48:29PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Is that a "Mutt" in ascii-art? :-) Where's it from..?
Yes, it's that. It is from me, and freshly done. In memory of the moment
where I found in the manual that it was possible to
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different outputs. The first is from the manual install and the
second is from the RPM install
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 11:34:45AM -0600, Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 11:34:45AM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt*
-rwxr-sr-x1 root mail36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttbug*
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 11:34:45AM -0600, Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Marius Gedminas wrote:
I've had *lots* and *lots* of problems with Mutt and colours. All
investigations and lots of time spent debugging them showed that the
problems weren't Mutt's fault. I finally fixed my terminfo and settled
on ncurses 5.0, since it distored my
On 2000-06-21 14:11:05 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt*
-rwxr-sr-x1 root mail36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttbug*
-rwxr-xr-x
I just had a suggestion for what might be a nice feature for Mutt.
The grepmail program is nice since it greps for e-mails containing something
and spits them out in standard mail format. We could add a search mail
function that does:
grepmail keyword /tmp/mutt-11241
and then loads
At 1:34 PM EDT on June 21 Vincent Danen sent off:
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different outputs. The first is from the
Please help me, how to send email using mutt ( only attachments )with from
comand prompt only.
i.e I don't want to open the composer because I,m executing a shell script.
Please reply [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Your Private,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 03:35:42PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different outputs. The first
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 09:45:22PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt*
-rwxr-sr-x1 root mail36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttbug*
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:11:05PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
different outputs. The
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 04:03:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could add a search mail function that does:
grepmail keyword /tmp/mutt-11241
and then loads /tmp/mutt-11241 or whatever as the current box.
Mutt already has that feature.
l ~b keyword
will limit the messages
Mike Markowski:
Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
single slash, I get this:
how in the world did you find out? i would never have had the idea to try
to put two slashes in there! now tell us: what made you do this? not the
marsians again
clemens
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Vincent Danen wrote:
Anyone know why there's such a discrepancy? I think the RPM might be
stripping the binaries but I don't know if that would make such a big
difference... Doing a mutt -v on both the RPM and manual binaries
produces the same output:
The spec-helper
Binu --
...and then Binu Abraham said...
% Please help me, how to send email using mutt ( only attachments )with from
% comand prompt only.
% i.e I don't want to open the composer because I,m executing a shell script.
Just direct your input from /dev/null like any other message with no
body.
Hi again, folks --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% Mutt-1.2.2 is on its way to the FTP archive under
I pulled down the tarball, extracted, patched, configured, and made, but
was stopped because of the keymap_defs.h problem. Perhaps that should be
fixed before 1.2.3 comes out...
:-D
--
Binu Abraham proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Please help me, how to send email using mutt ( only attachments )with from
comand prompt only.
i.e I don't want to open the composer because I,m executing a shell script.
Why do you want to do this using _mutt_? There's a prog called fastmail
(see
46 matches
Mail list logo
