Re: ye olde mutt pgp/mime versus clearsign FAQ

2001-09-25 Thread Morten Liebach

On 25, Sep, 2001 at 08:48:07AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
 David T-G mutt [24/09/01 20:48 -0400]:
  % Now, what do I do?  Clearsign / encrypt it in the vim buffer itself?
  Use Shane's pgp_outlook_compat patch, as I've plugged here before.
 
 I use freebsd's port collection - I'll see if I can work this into the port
 I'm running.

I think you can make patch, then apply your 3rd party patch, and then
a make install.

I've done something like it with some other port on OpenBSD once.

HTH, HAND
Morten

-- 
Morten Liebach [EMAIL PROTECTED] || https://pc89225.stofanet.dk/
Get my PGP key from https://pc89225.stofanet.dk/pgpkey.asc
For a laugh, go to https://pc89225.stofanet.dk/ceritificate/



Re: ye olde mutt pgp/mime versus clearsign FAQ

2001-09-25 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Morten Liebach mutt [25/09/01 09:27 +0200]:
 I think you can make patch, then apply your 3rd party patch, and then
 a make install.

I'll see if I can contact the patch maintainer and move it into the freebsd
ports tree.  I'd hate to do it everytime I cvsup and install a new mutt.

-suresh

 PGP signature


Re: ye olde mutt pgp/mime versus clearsign FAQ

2001-09-25 Thread Derek D. Martin

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:48:37PM -0400, David T-G wrote:

 % Known issue: Outlook and Eudora (for example) barf on pgp-mime.
 
 Yep.
[SNIP]
 Use Shane's pgp_outlook_compat patch, as I've plugged here before.

Well, o.k. thanks...  But two questions:

 - Where can I get the patch?

 - If litterally no one else (apparently) supports PGP in this manner,
   why does mutt insist on doing it this way?


-- 
---
Derek Martin  |   Unix/Linux geek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|   GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu




German manual

2001-09-25 Thread Michael Tatge

Hi there,

does anyone have a german translation of the manual? A friend of mine
wants to use mutt, but he doesn't understand english very well.

TIA,

Michael
-- 

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



imap-ssl client certification

2001-09-25 Thread Niels den Otter

Hello,

I try to setup mutt to read my imap mailbox that is only accessible using
SSL. In my muttrc I added:
 set certificate_file=~/.mutt/certificates

and ~/.mutt/certificate contains my client certificate that I received from
our CA. From what I understand from the documentation this is also(?) the
file where the server certificates are kept/added.

When I try to connect to the imap server (which is actually a imap daemon
behind stunnel) I get:
 sambal:~ mutt -f imaps://incoming-s:993/inbox
 SSL failed: unspecified protocol error

I know that client certification needs to be done to this server. Is this
done by the mutt imap-SSL implementation? If this is not supported, is there
an other way to connect to my imap-SSL mailbox?


Thanks in advance,

Niels



Re: German manual

2001-09-25 Thread Stefan Antoni

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:

 does anyone have a german translation of the manual? A friend of mine
 wants to use mutt, but he doesn't understand english very well.
I don't know about a german translation yet, but if there is _none_,
shouldn't we make one up?
I got 2 weeks holidays from school beginning the next week, 
anybody interested in participating?
if there would be 2 or 3 people including me we could combine
effords :)


-- 

Best regards,
Stefan Antoni



Re: German manual

2001-09-25 Thread Stefan Antoni

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:48:06PM -0400, Stefan Antoni wrote:

  does anyone have a german translation of the manual? A friend of mine
  wants to use mutt, but he doesn't understand english very well.
 I don't know about a german translation yet, but if there is _none_,
 shouldn't we make one up?
 I got 2 weeks holidays from school beginning the next week, 
 anybody interested in participating?
 if there would be 2 or 3 people including me we could combine
 effords :)
 
 
 -- 
 
 Best regards,
 Stefan Antoni

DTFQ! (do the fucking query!)
... Never write to much about a topic before doing a google-search,
what we want is already there ;)

ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/doc/de



Re: German manual

2001-09-25 Thread Christoph Maurer

Am Die, 25 Sep 2001, schrieb Stefan Antoni:

 On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
 
  does anyone have a german translation of the manual? A friend of mine
  wants to use mutt, but he doesn't understand english very well.
 I don't know about a german translation yet, but if there is _none_,
 shouldn't we make one up?
 I got 2 weeks holidays from school beginning the next week, 
 anybody interested in participating?
 if there would be 2 or 3 people including me we could combine
 effords :)

I'm quite sure I once had a german translation...

Wait a minute.

Ok, I've found it.
It is included with the mutt package of SuSE 7.1. 

It is for version 1.25, but it should not be too difficult to merge
it with the newest features...

I could send it per PM to anyone who is interested in it...

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Maurer - Paul-Röntgen-Straße 7 - D - 52072 Aachen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.christophmaurer.de
On my Homepage: SuSE 7.0 on an Acer Travelmate 508 T Notebook



Re: German manual - mutt-1.4/doc/manual.txt

2001-09-25 Thread Sven Guckes

* Stefan Antoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010925 12:46]:
 On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
  does anyone have a german translation of the manual? A friend of mine
  wants to use mutt, but he doesn't understand english very well.
 I don't know about a german translation yet, but
 if there is _none_, shouldn't we make one up?

I'd suggest to *translate* the manual
instead of making one up.  ;-)

 I got 2 weeks holidays from school beginning the
 next week, anybody interested in participating?
 if there would be 2 or 3 people including
 me we could combine effords :)

I suggest to make this a project of its own
(including maillist) and wait for mutt-1.4
to be released.  And *then* start the translation.

Sven

-- 
Sven Guckes  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUTT SETUP TIPS: http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/setup.html
MUTT HOOKS EXAMPLE:  send-hook guckes set nopgp_autosign



Re: German manual

2001-09-25 Thread Thomas Huemmler

Hi Michael,

* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010925 13:29]:
 does anyone have a german translation of the manual? A friend of mine

there are several URLs, where you can find the german manual, for
example:

ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/doc/de/ (in HTML, SGML und TXT)

or

http://www.bursik.net/priv/howto/mutt/manual.html (only HTML)

Note: this is the manual for 1.2.5

Others you can find, if you ask - for example - google to search for 
*mutt*, *manual* and *german*

HTH,
Thomas




Re: Problems with 1.3.22's iconv/libiconv

2001-09-25 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:37:02PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
 
 i don't know too much about this, but i was able to get over thie
 problem with some help from some developers on this list.  i had to
 export LDFLAGS to something; in my case, this worked:
 
 LDFLAGS=-Wl,-R/usr/local/lib ./configure --with-domain=newdream.net
 --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local/lib

Thanks. Reading your reply, I remembered the ld.so.conf file. I just added
/opt/libiconv/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and rand ldconfig. Works like a charm
now.

Thanks,
js.
- -- 
Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage http://jsmoriss.mvlan.net/
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot!
-  please pgp encrypt all correspondence 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Personal Home Page http://jsmoriss.mvlan.net/

iD8DBQE7sIcpnGyIOcYaingRAivkAJ0SaRIHdla6YRhZyGxATlUPv5wALgCgjCZy
0D++VJKczlUFU6A9JW5HwHk=
=SvFt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: configure breaks on libiconv

2001-09-25 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I had a similar problem just yesterday. Make sure /usr/local/lib is listed
in your /etc/ld.so.conf file (Red Hat). If not, then include it and run
'ldconfig'.

LateR!
js.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 07:22:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am trying to install mutt 1.3.22.1 having previously installed
 libiconv-1.7. Configure throws an error 
 
   checking whether this iconv is good enough... no
   configure: error: Try using libiconv instead
 
 I'm not quite sure what this means. libiconv is in /usr/local/lib which
 is where mutt says it's looking for it. Assuming that it's the correct
 library - curiously, there are several, all with today's date;
 
 -rw-r--r--   1 root root  695 Sep 24 17:05 /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la
 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   17 Sep 24 17:05 /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so - 
libiconv.so.2.0.4
 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   17 Sep 24 17:05 /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2 
- libiconv.so.2.0.4
 -rw-r--r--   1 root root   904387 Sep 24 17:05 
/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2.0.4
 -rw-r--r--   1 root root   904080 Sep 24 17:05 
/usr/local/lib/libiconv_plug.so
 
 
 Am I missing something quite simple?
 
 Thanks in Advance.
 
   Sean

- -- 
Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage http://jsmoriss.mvlan.net/
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot!
-  please pgp encrypt all correspondence 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Personal Home Page http://jsmoriss.mvlan.net/

iD8DBQE7sIetnGyIOcYaingRAs2iAJ9Sqm+Lh47KyxAk4z2iJMpC8xmOjgCeJ7ad
LvYbFXSRdbOCgMC5weWZWyw=
=bnUs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



OT - weird sendmail error msg

2001-09-25 Thread Dan Boger

yes, I know it's way off-topic, but I figure people here might know...
what would make sendmail barf on a queue, saying Deferred: Permission
denied?  Trying to help a friend's site, with about 600 msgs stuck in
the queue, and more gathering there all the time...

anyone have any idea?

Thanks!

-- 
Dan Boger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 PGP signature


Re: OT - weird sendmail error msg

2001-09-25 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Dan Boger mutt [25/09/01 09:45 -0400]:
 yes, I know it's way off-topic, but I figure people here might know...
 what would make sendmail barf on a queue, saying Deferred: Permission
 denied?  Trying to help a friend's site, with about 600 msgs stuck in
 the queue, and more gathering there all the time...

Post some logs willya?  Likely a permissions problem in his mail spool, or
elsewhere.

--suresh

 PGP signature


Re: German manual

2001-09-25 Thread Michael Tatge

Thomas Huemmler muttered:
 * Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010925 13:29]:
  does anyone have a german translation of the manual? A friend of mine
 
 there are several URLs, where you can find the german manual, for
 example:
 
 ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/doc/de/ (in HTML, SGML und TXT)

Cool. Thanks to all posters.

 Note: this is the manual for 1.2.5

Well just to learn mutt it should be recent enough.

 Others you can find, if you ask - for example - google to search for 
 *mutt*, *manual* and *german*

Asking here works quit faster. ;)

Michael
-- 

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



Re: German manual - mutt-1.4/doc/manual.txt

2001-09-25 Thread Michael Tatge

Sven Guckes muttered:
 I suggest to make this a project of its own
 (including maillist) and wait for mutt-1.4
 to be released.  And *then* start the translation.

Good Idea. Maybe I find the time to participate.

Michael
-- 

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



~l pattern

2001-09-25 Thread René Clerc

Hi all,

I want to do some specific colorizing when I'm viewing mailing lists.
(I encountered some examples from Sven Guckes)

Unforunately, things don't work the way I think they should work.

== color definitions

# ~/.mutt/list-colors
color index brightblueblack ~h 'In-Reply-To: .*clerc\.nl'
color index brightblueblack ~x '.*clerc\.nl'
color index brightyellow  black ~P

# ~/.mutt/unlist-colors
color index white   black ~h 'In-Reply-To: .*clerc\.nl'
color index white   black ~x '.*clerc\.nl'
color index white   black ~P

== file with the problems in it ;)

# ~/.muttrc
subscribe mutt
lists mutt

[...]

folder-hook .  source ~/.mutt/unlist-colors
folder-hook ~l source ~/.mutt/list-colors


The problem lies with the ~l : if I replace this with =mutt (where
procmail dumps all these mails) it works fine. Do I have to tell mutt
somehow that =mutt is a folder where mailing list mails are dumped in?

TIA,

-- 
René Clerc  - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Friends will keep you sane, Love could fill your heart, A lover can warm
your bed, But lonely is the soul without a mate.
-David Pratt on alt.soulmates

 PGP signature


Re: ~l pattern

2001-09-25 Thread Michael Tatge

René Clerc muttered:
 I want to do some specific colorizing when I'm viewing mailing lists.
 Unforunately, things don't work the way I think they should work.

Shit happens. :)

 == color definitions
 
 # ~/.mutt/list-colors
 color index brightblueblack ~h 'In-Reply-To: .*clerc\.nl'
 color index brightblueblack ~x '.*clerc\.nl'
 color index brightyellow  black ~P
 
 # ~/.mutt/unlist-colors
 color index white   black ~h 'In-Reply-To: .*clerc\.nl'
 color index white   black ~x '.*clerc\.nl'
 color index white   black ~P
 
 == file with the problems in it ;)
 
 # ~/.muttrc
 subscribe mutt
 lists mutt
 
 folder-hook .  source ~/.mutt/unlist-colors
 folder-hook ~l source ~/.mutt/list-colors

The ~l pattern does not cover the folder you save mailing list messages
in. And there is no folder ~l I suppose.

 Do I have to tell mutt somehow that =mutt is a folder where mailing
 list mails are dumped in?

Well, yes. Shell vars maybe of help here.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
On the Internet, no one knows you're using Windows NT
(Submitted by Ramiro Estrugo, [EMAIL PROTECTED])

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



Re: Mutt and GPG

2001-09-25 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:59:08PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
 
 gpg --list-keys | perl -n -e '/(.*?)/; print send-hook $1 \set 
pgp_autoencrypt\\n'  ~/.muttrc.autoenc

gpg --list-keys|perl -ne '/^.*(.*).*$/; print send-hook $1 \set 
pgp_autoencrypt\\n if $1;'|sort -u

Removes blank lines and duplicates. :-)

LateR!
js.
- -- 
Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage http://jsmoriss.mvlan.net/
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot!
-  please pgp encrypt all correspondence 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Personal Home Page http://jsmoriss.mvlan.net/

iD8DBQE7sJ2dnGyIOcYaingRAjQYAKDrun4TV+KEuaB1zYpUp6hhRwMtbQCfUMYX
PjshUwUHXi95H/v98FNkd5Y=
=mTN5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: ~l pattern

2001-09-25 Thread René Clerc

* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25-09-2001 17:03]:

|  folder-hook .  source ~/.mutt/unlist-colors
|  folder-hook ~l source ~/.mutt/list-colors
| 
| The ~l pattern does not cover the folder you save mailing list messages
| in. And there is no folder ~l I suppose.

Indeed, there is no such folder. But Sven put this on his page
(http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/setup/mutt.personal):

# Mailing Lists
# show part of the index when looking at mailings lists:
  folder-hook ~l   set pager_index_lines=10
  folder-hook ~l   set read_inc=50

I tried these commands as well, changed

lists mutt to lists mutt-users just like Sven, but still no happy
happy joy joy... :(

|  Do I have to tell mutt somehow that =mutt is a folder where mailing
|  list mails are dumped in?
| 
| Well, yes. Shell vars maybe of help here.

Probably. There are many workarounds. But I want the ~l option to
work, because I believe it's designed for this issue ;)

-- 
René Clerc  - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Like I said, love wouldn't be so blind if the braille weren't so damned great!
-Armistead Maupin



Re: ~l pattern

2001-09-25 Thread Michael Tatge

René Clerc muttered:
 * Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25-09-2001 17:03]:
 | Well, yes. Shell vars maybe of help here.
 
 Probably. There are many workarounds. But I want the ~l option to
 work, because I believe it's designed for this issue ;)

~l  message is addressed to a known mailing list
Sven is probably using a patch.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
Problem solving under linux has never been the circus that it is under
AIX.
(By Pete Ehlke in comp.unix.aix)

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



Re: Archivation through mutt?

2001-09-25 Thread darren chamberlain

Matìj Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/25/2001:
 I have worked on archmail script a little bit yesterday and the 
 results are attached (I used zip to ensure verbatim transport). 
 I have divided script into two, because I was not able to debugg 
 your find command. However, I have now problem with bash. 
 Consider following screenshot:
 
 mail $ test -f ./sluzebni/; echo $?
 1
 mail $ test -d ./sluzebni/; echo $?
 0
 mail $ ll
 total 332
 -rw-rw-r--1 matejmatej   0 kvì  3 19:30 drafts
 drwxrwxr-x2 matejmatej4096 záø  9 15:54 list
 drwxrwxr-x2 matejmatej4096 záø 25 10:26 pratele
 -rw-rw-r--1 matejmatej  270658 kvì  2 06:03 sent-200104
 -rw-rw-r--1 matejmatej   45374 kvì  3 20:58 sent-200105
 drwxrwxr-x2 matejmatej4096 záø 25 10:48 sluzebni
 
 If understand my bash manpage well, the second command should 
 produce 1 too. Have you any idea why it doesn't? I am using bash 
 2.04.11(1)-release on RedHat GNU/Linux 7.0.

Why would the second produce 1?

Here is what I get, doing something similar:

bash$ echo $BASH_VERSION
2.03.8(1)-release
bash$ if test -d ./tmp/; then echo ./tmp is a directory; fi
./tmp is a directory
bash$ test -d ./tmp; echo $?
0

Remember, under *nix, 0 is true, 1 is false, so this is the
correct behavior.

-f tests that (quoting man test): FILE exists and is a regular
file, i.e., not a directory, thus the 1 (false) return value for
the first call to test.

If you are using shell builtins and standard commands, you can
rely on what you are used to as truth if you merely call test
in a boolean context:

  if test -d ./sluzebni/; then
# it is a directory; do your stuff
  else
# not a directory; perhaps check -f or -S?
  fi

The contents of $? is probably not what you're after, so much as
a true value, unless you are checking for a specific error message.

(darren)

-- 
Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.



Re: Archivation through mutt?

2001-09-25 Thread Mariusz Drozdziel

On wto, 25 wrz, in tucznik.ml.mutt-users, you wrote:

 mail $ test -f ./sluzebni/; echo $?
 1
 mail $ test -d ./sluzebni/; echo $?
 0


 If understand my bash manpage well, the second command should 
 produce 1 too. Have you any idea why it doesn't? I am using bash 

No, it shouldn't. :) When value '1' is returned, when test
was failed, so in the first example test command tells that
object ./sluzebni is not a file. In the second case value is 
zero becouse test was passwd. :)




Greets, Nova.
-- 
 
  Mariusz.
 
 
= Mariusz Drodziel [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 2:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==



test command in shell (was Re: Archivation through mutt?)

2001-09-25 Thread Olaf Schulz

Hallo Matj, 
I did not read your script but I want to answer your shell question:

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:15:32AM -0400, Matj Cepl wrote:
  [...mail archival script...]

 I have divided script into two, because I was not able to debugg 
 your find command. However, I have now problem with bash. 
 Consider following screenshot:
 
 mail $ test -f ./sluzebni/; echo $?
testing if an ordinary file ./sluzebni/ exists
 1
no.

 mail $ test -d ./sluzebni/; echo $?
testing if  ./sluzebni/ is a directory.
 0
yes.
 mail $ ll
 total 332
 -rw-rw-r--1 matejmatej   0 kv  3 19:30 drafts
 drwxrwxr-x2 matejmatej4096 z  9 15:54 list
 drwxrwxr-x2 matejmatej4096 z 25 10:26 pratele
 -rw-rw-r--1 matejmatej  270658 kv  2 06:03 sent-200104
 -rw-rw-r--1 matejmatej   45374 kv  3 20:58 sent-200105
 drwxrwxr-x2 matejmatej4096 z 25 10:48 sluzebni
 
 If understand my bash manpage well, the second command should 
 produce 1 too. Have you any idea why it doesn't? I am using bash 
 2.04.11(1)-release on RedHat GNU/Linux 7.0.

two things, very general in unix:
in the shell a return code 0 means "OK, no errors, true"
in opposite to most programming and scripting languages where
0 is associated with false and values different from 0 with true.

what test (a shell builtin for bash) does, I wrote above.
ask your shell: help test 
to get a full list of it's behaviour.


Olaf
extra for you switched my font to iso8859-2



Re: Mutt 1.3.22 not displaying accent chars

2001-09-25 Thread Derek D. Martin

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:13:05AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
 ...and then Derek D. Martin said...
 % You guys must be getting sick of hearing from me...  :)
 
 Nope.  We'll just expect you to be a very vocal answer poster later!

Well I'll see what I can do!

 % However, when I view the same message in the 1.3.22 version,
 % characters with accents (like in Rene's name) don't show up.  Er, they
 % do, but they show up as question marks.
 
 I dont have an answer for you, but the first thing I would do would be to
 check your $LC_* vars, the second thing would be to compare your system
 and personal muttrc files

As I  said, both of those are  just about identical.  I explicitly set
my LC  variables because of Red  Hat and/or GNU internationalizing all
of the standard GNU utilities which have suddenly changed their output
after 20 years...

  LC_COLLATE=C
  LC_MESSAGES=en_US
  LC_TIME=en_US
  LC_NUMERIC=en_US
 

 and the third thing would be to compile up 1.3.22.1 on the 1.2.5 box
 and try it.  It takes a lot to get me to dig into the manual and
 look for strings like locale and international and so on.

I'll have to give that a shot.  I apparently need to get the clearsign
patch for mutt anyway, so I may as well recompile with the latest.



-- 
---
Derek Martin  |   Unix/Linux geek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|   GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu




Mutt and SMTP-AUTH

2001-09-25 Thread Abu Hudzaefah

How to set mutt with smtp-server using SMTP-AUTH?
Anybody please help me.

~yusril~



Re: Mutt and SMTP-AUTH

2001-09-25 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Abu Hudzaefah mutt [26/09/01 09:40 +0700]:
 How to set mutt with smtp-server using SMTP-AUTH?
 Anybody please help me.

That's the job of your local sendmail / exim / postfix or whatever.
RTFM the FAQs of whichever MTA you use.

-suresh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7sVHMRB4r9e3t77kRAn1hAKCGV4DdmrcQqPVFBGFlfPBPdYSYWgCffDNm
wWWU5QY7l1qpzbL9k6424yY=
=OD0b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: GnuPG and accented characters

2001-09-25 Thread Rino Mardo

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:19:22AM +0200 or thereabouts, Ren? Clerc wrote:
 Hi everyone,
 
 since we're talking about gpg anyway, perhaps I may find the answer to
 my problem here.
 
 as you can learn from my .signature, my name contains an e-accent-aigu.
 When I generate my key, with this character in it, everything's fine,
 but when I publish my key to the keyserver, it ends up like:
 
 Ren?? Clerc
 
 I used the both iso-8859-1 and iso-8859-2 for the --charset option,
 but this doesn't help. Does anybody know how to handle this problem?
 Is there another way of escaping this character in the gpg prompts?
 
 Or should I change some TERM setting or so? (mine is 'screen' right
 now)...
 
 Or should I just change my name? (sigh...)
 
 All the help is appreciated!
 
hi. i found your mail in mutt-users mailing list and i'm having problem
displaying accented characters in mutt.  like your name it is appearing as
Ren??.  have you found the solution yet?

-- 
GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and impossible
to accomplish complex actions.   --Doug Gwyn  (22/Jun/91 in comp.unix.wizards)

 PGP signature