* Rado S on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 19:23:47 +0100:
> =- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 18:40:24 +0100 -=
>
>>> b) jump last seen:
>>> macro ...
>>
>> "b" is _marked_, jump to "a", unflag "a", everything unflagged.
>
> Argl, I said "not literal", d'oh. ;)
>
> mark -> flag.
=- Darrin Chandler wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 12:42:56 -0700 -=
> > > When replying, mutt asks "Reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([yes]/no)?"
> > > or some such, and "no" gets me the real person (rather than
> > > the list). With "a" to add an alias I get no such choice -
> > > it always wants to add the
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:27:59PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> =- Darrin Chandler wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 11:08:54 -0700 -=
>
> > However, one situation comes up fairly often... I want to add an alias
> > for someone in the message, but not who mutt thinks is the sender. This
> > happens on mailing l
* Travis H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-07 13:35]:
[...]
> I do. I just started with mutt recently and I'm having to put
> things into my aliases the first time I send to a person or
> list. Probably it will not be as frequent as time goes on.
> Still, it'd be nice to have it so people could bin
* Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-07 13:15]:
[...]
> The times I want to add an alias completely separate from a current
> message are few and far between. For me, I wouldn't think adding a "new
> blank alias" feature would be worth it.
[...]
add lbdb to your system and utilize it fo
* On 2007.02.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there really no way to do a generic create-alias, where you don't
> have to change the information of the current sender? I've often
> wanted to do this - just hit 'a', but not have to erase all
=- Darrin Chandler wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 11:08:54 -0700 -=
> However, one situation comes up fairly often... I want to add an alias
> for someone in the message, but not who mutt thinks is the sender. This
> happens on mailing lists, usually. When replying, mutt asks "Reply to
> [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:18:40PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> Of course everything that automates repeated operation is good, but
> you have to question: does it pay off to have this feature extra?
> How many people use it _like you_?
I do. I just started with mutt recently and I'm having to put
thin
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:50:08PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> > Those added with "a" don't have to be sourced. But "a" only adds
> > the sender's address. The only way to add an arbitrary alias
> > seems to be to edit the alias file directly - and then to make
> > it effective {...} the alias file woul
=- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 18:40:24 +0100 -=
> > b) jump last seen:
> > macro ...
>
> "b" is _marked_, jump to "a", unflag "a", everything unflagged.
Argl, I said "not literal", d'oh. ;)
mark -> flag.
This way b is _flagged_.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> ... one part being the defensive things listed by Travis, but you
> also shouldn't forget that some "outsiders" rate html-ized mails
> as spammy, so at least the score increases or in the worst case
> it's outright blocked unless white-liste
=- Bill wrote on Mon 5.Feb'07 at 20:34:32 -0800 -=
> I've found that hitting 'v' in mutt's mail browser, and then
> typing uppercase 'T' (while the text portion of the message is
> selected), opens, what for me is a cleaner rendering of a message.
Please don't report keys but function names from
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:18:40PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> =- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 8:49:52 -0600 -=
>
> > Wouldn't it be good to have another that just
> > starts with everything blank, instead of making the user open a
> > blank folder or erase all the information?
>
> Of
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:58:56PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > Mail is arriving as expected and getting delivered (by the same Perl
> > script as I was using on the Linux system) to various mailing list
> > mailboxes etc.
* Rado S on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 18:08:10 +0100:
> =- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 14:19:16 +0100 -=
>
>>> Then to suffice your requirement you could simply bind the "n"
>>> key to a macro that does the above /and/ executes
>>> .
>>
>> Hm, I'm too dense, I tried, but everyth
=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 8:49:52 -0600 -=
> Wouldn't it be good to have another that just
> starts with everything blank, instead of making the user open a
> blank folder or erase all the information?
Of course everything that automates repeated operation is good, but
you
=- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 14:19:16 +0100 -=
> > Then to suffice your requirement you could simply bind the "n"
> > key to a macro that does the above /and/ executes
> > .
>
> Hm, I'm too dense, I tried, but everything leaves me on the
> message that was marked -- marking the me
* On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 I ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> * On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > Mail is arriving as expected and getting delivered
>
> Which mailbox format are you using? mbox, maildir?
Oh and I forgot - external new mail notifiers might change
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:52:47AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:37:53PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:11:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I am migrating my main mail reading activity from a Linux system (this
> > > one) to a B
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:37:53PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:11:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am migrating my main mail reading activity from a Linux system (this
> > one) to a BSD one.
> >
> > So I have copied across my muttrc file and a few other r
* On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Mail is arriving as expected and getting delivered (by the same Perl
> script as I was using on the Linux system) to various mailing list
> mailboxes etc.
Which mailbox format are you using? mbox, maildir?
If mbox - check the
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:42:29AM -0700, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 6 at 02:37 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > A connected question - is there a way from within mutt to see what a
> > variable is set to?
>
> :set ?variable
>
Ah, I knew there was a ? involved somewhere but I co
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:50:08PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
> a) open an empty folder, where there is no "current addr". ;)
>
> b) use (often ^U) to erase whole line at once, in case
> you're bothered by "delete char-by-char". Much faster.
OK, these help, but they're still not ideal. Wouldn't it be
* On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 Michelle Konzack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I have found an Error in mutt while using IMAP and connecting to courier.
> If I enter a Mailfolder with mails, mutt does not only fetch the desired
> headers but the whole NEW messages...
Check your color and spam settings. Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, February 6 at 02:37 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> A connected question - is there a way from within mutt to see what a
> variable is set to?
:set ?variable
~Kyle
- --
The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest
id
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:11:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am migrating my main mail reading activity from a Linux system (this
> one) to a BSD one.
>
> So I have copied across my muttrc file and a few other rlated bits and
> pieces and I'm testing mutt on the new (to me) system.
>
>
I am migrating my main mail reading activity from a Linux system (this
one) to a BSD one.
So I have copied across my muttrc file and a few other rlated bits and
pieces and I'm testing mutt on the new (to me) system.
Mail is arriving as expected and getting delivered (by the same Perl
script as I
=- Jing Xue wrote on Mon 5.Feb'07 at 19:12:29 -0500 -=
> Those added with "a" don't have to be sourced. But "a" only adds
> the sender's address. The only way to add an arbitrary alias
> seems to be to edit the alias file directly - and then to make
> it effective {...} the alias file would have
* Andreas Herceg on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 07:06:05 +0100:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:57:54PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> * David Champion on Monday, February 05, 2007 at 13:34:26 -0600:
>>> http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.11.dgc.markmsg.2
>>> provides an operation wh
* On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 Javier Rojas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> It should tag all messages, whether collapsed or not. After all, it tags
> all the *threads* that match a given criteria.
No it shouldn't. Never operate on non-visible messages. You might argue
it should un-collapse all threads th
Hi Thomas,
* Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070206 19:07]:
> On 2007-02-06 14:07:36 +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
> > * Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070206 01:20]:
> > >
> > > I have found an Error in mutt while using IMAP and connecting to courier.
> > >
> > > If I enter a Mailfol
This sounds like the body cache is in effect... To set the
directory where the files go, configure message_cachedir.
To turn it off, set message_cachedir to "".
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2007-02-06 14:07:36 +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
> From: Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTE
32 matches
Mail list logo
