Thanks for the replies.
On 26/11/20 10:38,
Cameron Simpson put forth the proposition:
> I'd expect rsync to be faster than scp, and personally I'd use "cd
> the-mailddir; tar cf
> - . | ssh remote 'cd remote-maildir; tar xf -'" which should be much
> faster than either.
Very interesting idea..
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:30:54PM +, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a Maildir folder which I want to move to another machine:
> about 830M with 29000 messages.
>
> Would just rsync'ing or scp'ing be OK?
>
> I'm asking because I noticed that either procmail or getmail puts th
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:34:30AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Probably. I don't have a FreeBSD box to hand. Is yours a Raspberry?
yup, rpi4 with 8GB
Have you got ktrace and kdump? Less interactive, but IIRC the process is
to ktrace your mutt command and kdump the resulting log file.
I d
On 25Nov2020 22:30, Dave Woodfall wrote:
>I have a Maildir folder which I want to move to another machine:
>about 830M with 29000 messages.
>
>Would just rsync'ing or scp'ing be OK?
Yes. Use "scp -p" if you use scp, preserves permissions and timestamps
(actually not very important unless you're
On 25Nov2020 22:33, tech-lists wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:01:03AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>A way to check this would be to have another window open running:
>>
>> strace -p pid-of-idle-mutt-process
>>
>>Get that ready. Wait for idleness. Resume. See where it stalls.
>>
>>If that i
On 25Nov2020 17:56, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>* tech-lists [11-25-20 17:55]:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 05:43:21PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>> > possibly reinstall strace. for my openSUSE Tumbleweed system I
>> > show: strace-5.9-1.1.x86_64
>> >
>> > your version is quite old and version n
* tech-lists [11-25-20 17:55]:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 05:43:21PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> > possibly reinstall strace. for my openSUSE Tumbleweed system I show:
> > strace-5.9-1.1.x86_64
> >
> > your version is quite old and version number appear to reflect the kernel
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 05:43:21PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
possibly reinstall strace. for my openSUSE Tumbleweed system I show:
strace-5.9-1.1.x86_64
your version is quite old and version number appear to reflect the kernel
version. what kernel are you running, 4.5.x ??
I'm usi
IIRC I just went with the ports/mail/mutt defaults.
I selected ispell because I'm more used to the ispell interface.
Now-a-days it's all aspell under the covers.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:19:57PM +, tech-lists wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:59:30AM -0600, Hokan wrote:
>
>
Hi!
I've moved/renamed/backed up/restored Maildirs which contain files with the
hostname in the file name and it really doesn't matter afaict. getmail,
procmail, etc just want a way to construct a unique filename, so they use the
hostname as part of it. Your mail reader shouldn't care what the
* tech-lists [11-25-20 17:36]:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:01:03AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > A way to check this would be to have another window open running:
> >
> >strace -p pid-of-idle-mutt-process
> >
> > Get that ready. Wait for idleness. Resume. See where it stalls.
>
Hello all,
I have a Maildir folder which I want to move to another machine:
about 830M with 29000 messages.
Would just rsync'ing or scp'ing be OK?
I'm asking because I noticed that either procmail or getmail puts the
hostname in the file names, and I wondered if this would cause
problems at the
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:01:03AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
A way to check this would be to have another window open running:
strace -p pid-of-idle-mutt-process
Get that ready. Wait for idleness. Resume. See where it stalls.
If that is hard to observe interactively, strace has opt
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:59:30AM -0600, Hokan wrote:
I am running a month-old FreeBSD-CURRENT on an RPI-4 (8GB) and could not
replicate the problem.
thanks for posting yr config.
Your mutt is compiled just slightly differently:
hcache backend: Berkeley DB 5.3.28: (September 9, 2
On 25Nov2020 14:19, tech-lists wrote:
>I'm finding mutt significantly more laggy to resume on later
>versions (=>2.x) than say 1.5.21.
>
>Let's say there's the list of emails in a folder already selected. If
>I use up or down arrow for example, it'll sit for 3-4 seconds doing
>nothing and then m
I am running a month-old FreeBSD-CURRENT on an RPI-4 (8GB) and could not
replicate the problem.
Mutt 2.0.2 (2020-11-20)
Copyright (C) 1996-2020 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistr
For a more generic solution that I just setup in my config file:
1. Use the following send-hook: send-hook ~l "set from='Name
'"
2. Declare all of the mailing lists to be caught by the ~l parameter using
lists: lists mutt-users@mutt.org gnupg-us...@gnupg.org
Now, whenever I reply to a mailing l
Hi,
I'm finding mutt significantly more laggy to resume on later
versions (=>2.x) than say 1.5.21.
Let's say there's the list of emails in a folder already
selected. If I use up or down arrow for example, it'll sit for
3-4 seconds doing nothing and then move. But once moving, it's
as responsi
The way I did it for this list is:
send-hook ~tmutt-us...@mutt.org "set from='ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್
'"
You should be able to edit the mutt-users@mutt.org to be *@groups.io or
something (you may have to escape the asterisk?) and then use set from='Name
' as the command to run.
HTH!
- Chiraag
--
ಚಿರಾ
Is there some sort of action/command I can run from send-hook that
would allow 'editing' of a header?
E.g. for the case I was recently enquiring about where groups.io munge
certain senders' addresses the requirement would be to have a
send-hook match on "via groups.io" in the From: header and wou
20 matches
Mail list logo
