: 8bit
Return-Path: gibby
Received: (from gibby@localhost)
by werich.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA00923
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 20:15:49 -0500
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 20:15:49 -0500
From: Andrew Eichmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Max_K=FCnemann?= [EMAIL
Timothy Ball proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Fetchmail is frowned upon because of the fact that fetchamil basically
runs as a deamon.
What's wrong with that?
Andy Eichmann
Hello,
When I thread mailing list messages, often the thread will be broken
up because of differing versions and placement of ``Re:'' in the
subject line, compounded by different mail clients' handling of
the subject line. For example, if the original message's Subject:
line is ``[BOB] What's
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 09:58:44PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Andrew --
I don't have an easy answer for your question, though procmail springs to
mind for starters. You mentioned searching the manual; did you find
$reply_regexp and see what you can do with it? It's pretty fancy...
Here's
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 09:59:30PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
I warn you now - this is more than you asked for.
Yep, it is. ;-)
Thanks anyway.
On 2000.06.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Andrew Eichmann" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the subject line. For example, if th
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 11:54:18PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
Threads are usually broken because someone's mailer doeesn't generate
any useful trackable header like Message-ID, References, or In-Reply-To.
I would rather get the person to use a better client, or smack her/his
ISP to add this
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 07:57:04AM -0500, Bela Bartok wrote:
some comments snipped
I just dont want to use sendmail, if i am sending a big email, and i
disconnect, it will stay in sendmail queue, and i dont want that. I want
to the simpler, bert solution for desktop freebsd machine for
