Hello.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:31:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:19:47 +0200, Johannes Berth wrote:
[...]
Apart from that, you might want to Postpone the Mail.
This is what I often do.
Since I discovered attach-mail (usually 'A'), I do not
Hi.
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
[...]
I was just wondering -- I tried tagging some collapsed threads, and then
pressing ;N. I was just guessing, but I guessed it right: it marks the
tagged articles (un)read...
What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 17:17:10 +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Benjamin Pflugmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
only the first message. Is there any work-around
Hi.
On Tue 2002-06-04 at 00:50:01 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
That is sort of ``batch'', I guess. I miss one-by-one
instead of all-at-once. It would be nice if I could tag
messages I want to reply to so that I can answer each
individual mail instead of a mass reply...
Maybe I completely
Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 23:07:26 -0400, Mike Arrison wrote:
Mutters,
I, like most of you, have more than one address I send from. I
use folder hooks to set from, my_hdr From, and my_hdr Reply-To.
This works perfectly except when I forget to change to the right folder
before
Hello.
On Wed 2002-06-12 at 10:37:21 -0400, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
[...]
I think what i'll do is filter probable spam as if it were just regular mail
and write a script that i can call on each piece of spam. The script will
count the number of bytes in the message (call it N) and then look
Hi.
On Thu 2002-06-20 at 16:56:24 +1000, Scott Howard wrote:
I'm fairly certain this isn't possible, but...
Our helpdesk system sends out emails every time a task/case/request is
created/updated/closed/etc.
These take the form of something like :
17 + Jun 17 Helpdesk ( 0) New
Hi.
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a limit
pattern to show only the mails of one correspondence.
How?
I do not think so. The work to do would
Hi.
Just minor addition, else, I think this has been discussed quite
thourougly now.
On Sat 2002-07-06 at 11:07:53 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
I misunderstood him (completely
Hi.
On Tue 2002-09-17 at 01:32:22 -0700, Jeremy Lin wrote:
[...]
So how do people right now search for multiple occurences of a pattern
anyway?
By pressing 'n', like in 'less'. :-)
Never noticed that re-searching for the same pattern does not find the
next match, like in less, because I
Hello.
On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
Be sure to use
Hello.
On Tue 2002-10-01 at 14:23:03 -0700, you wrote
--- Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
I usually work with mail on the local machine, but
sometimes have to log onto an IMAP server. I have no
problem logging on with
12 matches
Mail list logo