procmail not processing application/pgp?

2000-02-12 Thread Horacio MG
Hi, I just received a message sent with pine and gnupg signed using application/pgp, and didn't catch the sig: Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="135843165-1694285145-950362731=:690" A second message (same person, same sig, also pine) was correctly processed: Content-Type:

Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-12 Thread Horacio MG
Hi, I just realized that I can specify more than one recipient in the reply-to header. I tried this as out of need to have some replies sent over to different addresses. The mail arrives fine, with the two addresses included in the Reply-To field (as you might be able to see in this message),

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

2000-02-15 Thread Horacio MG
[yes] replies to the first address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [no] replies to the second address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) My Mutt (1.1.3) behaves differently too. Pressing "r" and "y" will reply to both addresses, "r" and "n" to just the iberia.es address. I'm not sure, but could this be somehow

Re: new HOWTO, or updated

2000-02-23 Thread Horacio MG
A lot of the contents is (I presume) still correct for mutt-1.0.1 and gnupg-1.0.1, but you should advertise prominently that Mutt's PGP configuration variables have changed a lot between mutt-1.0 and mutt-1.1, i.e. mention this at the start of the document, so people don't get confused by

mutt and qmail: child exited 127

2000-10-10 Thread Horacio MG
I've compiled and installed the latest version of mutt on OpenBSD 2.7. The MTA I'm using is qmail 1.03. I use fetchmail to retrieve the mail, and procmail to deliver it. I set both procmail and mutt to use maildir instead of mbox (it seems that mutt won't recognize the mbox style messages since

Re: -- explained

1999-06-03 Thread J Horacio MG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: ~ Quoting our friend -- brian moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ It depends on your editor. I use a vile macro to strip them on load -- ~ there are similar tricks for vim and most certainly emacs. ~ ~ Im using vim. Any suggestions? ;) also my vimrc is 95% German. Id really

Re: PGP Problem - Not on any doc (I think).

1999-06-14 Thread J Horacio MG
Eric Maquiling dixit: ~ ~ You missed one... read doc/PGP-Notes.txt that came with your Mutt ~ distribution. ~ ~ ~ I've also been looking for the answer to this. I've read and re-read ~ the PGP-Notes.txt and there is little documentation about whey pgp ~ messages are attachments rather than

quadoption [Mutt Manual Translation]

1999-06-15 Thread J Horacio MG
While translating the manual to Spanish, I've found I cannot possibly translate "quadoption". Could anyone give me a clear definition of it, please? TIA -- Horacio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valencia - ESPAÑA

Re: Port 50

1999-06-29 Thread J Horacio MG
Ralf Hildebrandt dixit: ~ ~ I've been using mutt for 3 months and I like it very much. Now my ~ institution forbids us to use Linux computers as mail servers in ~ order to prevent bulk mailing. ~ ~ First Law of System Requirements: ~"Anything is possible if you don't know what you're

Mutt manual!!! :-(

1999-06-29 Thread J Horacio MG
Now that I have nearly finished translating version 0.95.5 of the manual, I see the original has already been upgraded to 0.95.6! Is it possible to have "just" the changes into it, or will I have to review and compare both, one line after the other? Are there very many changes? major or just

Re: Mutt manual!!! :-) [Thanks!]

1999-06-30 Thread J Horacio MG
Thanks everyone, now it feels better! -- Horacio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valencia - ESPAÑA

Re: Another PGP question

1999-07-17 Thread J Horacio MG
rex dixit: On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 01:42:45AM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: Try it on this message. [ ... ] It shouldn't work here, since the pgp block should arrive as a mime attachment, and you sent it as part of the main message. Therefore it won't even appear with a "K" next to

FW: message makes mutt crash

1999-07-17 Thread J Horacio MG
: Balsa 0.4.9 Hola, On sáb, 17 jul 1999 16:33:54 J Horacio MG wrote: Juan Leseduarte dixit: Hola: On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 12:05:11PM +0200, J Horacio MG wrote: No, pero veo que los dos usáis la versión 0.95.3i. A mí no me ha ocurrido y sí he abierto ese mensaje, pero estoy usando la

Mutt+Procmail: problems with application/pgp

1999-07-26 Thread J Horacio MG
Hi, I'm having trouble with messages coming signed with old style application/pgp. The procmail recipe: :0 * !^Content-Type: message/ * !^Content-Type: multipart/ * !^Content-Type: application/pgp { :0 fBw * ^-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- * ^-END PGP MESSAGE- | formail \

Re: Mutt+Procmail: problems with application/pgp

1999-07-27 Thread J Horacio MG
David Thorburn-Gundlach dijo: % recipe, I get any application/pgp signed message with an empty body and: % application/pgp not suported - use "v" to see this part. I just have to ask... Are you sure that you have pgp support properly included, since you just rebuilt? For instance, this

Re: mbox or MAILDIR

1999-08-30 Thread J Horacio MG
David DeSimone dijo: Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only problem I have with mbox is I hate it when lines starting [...] While I hate this, too, it has recently come to my attention that Mutt [...] I've looked through this thread for the possibility of having both mbox

Re: mbox or MAILDIR

1999-08-30 Thread J Horacio MG
David DeSimone dijo: You can mix and match folder types all you like. Mutt will recognize and read/write whatever folder type already exists. The mbox_type variable only affects what type of folder Mutt will create when the folder does not exist. I use mbox for small folders, and

Re: GnuPG and Mutt

1999-09-01 Thread J Horacio MG
Mark Weinem dijo: Hi, (Debian GNU/Linux 2.1, 2.0.36) I'm running GnuPG 0.9.10-2. Gpg is the default in ~/.muttrc, and gpgm is a symbolic link to gpg. But sending my public key or encrypting still doesn't work. Mutt always asks for a key ID but every input seems to be wrong. I got

Re: GnuPG and Mutt

1999-09-02 Thread J Horacio MG
I'm running GnuPG 0.9.10-2. Gpg is the default in ~/.muttrc, and gpgm is a symbolic link to gpg. But sending my public key or encrypting still doesn't work. Mutt always asks for a key ID but every input seems to be wrong. It still doesn't work. Can you elaborate a bit more? I

Re: muttrc

1999-09-04 Thread J Horacio MG
Pieter Wenk dijo: Till now I am using Kmail, running with KDE under SuSE 6.1. I never used mutt, but do use Knews as NR, implementing also vi a text writer. Could somebody tell me exactly: What are muttrc ? A magic spell? In other words, it's mutt's configuration file, which should be

Re: PGP/GPG unknown variables

1999-09-04 Thread J Horacio MG
Thomas Roessler dijo: On 1999-09-03 16:58:54 -0700, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote: Wrong way around. These variables are used by the unstable branch, that is, 0.96. They are _not_ used by 0.95, or 1.0. Silly question... but I just have to ask: What indicates whether a version is

Re: charsets??

1999-09-04 Thread J Horacio MG
Fairlight dijo: On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 10:15:21AM +0200, J Horacio MG blurted: http://www.mutt.org is «the mother of all sites» ... well, as far as mutt goes. There should be a link (in user's pages? or download?) to where the .rpm's are located. So why do the 1/2 symbol and the top

Re: Answer to Linux charsets problem

1999-09-04 Thread J Horacio MG
Fairlight dijo: After looking at the kernel source, the unicode docs, and not a small amount of pestering of Alan Cox, who was kind enough to help me, I've discovered that for (stock, American) Linux consoles, you really want your .muttrc to say: set charset="ibm437" And all is

Re: charsets??

1999-09-05 Thread J Horacio MG
Marius Gedminas dijo: My version of mutt interprets these characters correctly (by converting them from iso-8859-1 to iso-8859-13 which I use). iso-8859-13 ... isn't it an extended iso-8859-1 containing the euro currency sign? does it work like iso-8859-1? where can I get hold of it?

Re: charsets??

1999-09-05 Thread J Horacio MG
J Horacio MG dijo: iso-8859-13 ... isn't it an extended iso-8859-1 containing the euro currency sign? does it work like iso-8859-1? where can I get hold of it? My apologies, iso-8859-15 is the one which is an extended iso-8859-1. Is anyone using this charset? If so, does it work just

Re: Realname and EMail address ?

1999-09-08 Thread J Horacio MG
Sebastian Helms dijo: Hello, I want to set my email address in the from: header to an address different from my system email, which is [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example, instead of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I'd like to set "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" for ALL outgoing emails. How can I do that ? I have

Re: muttrc

1999-09-09 Thread J Horacio MG
Marco Giardini dijo: I'm new to mutt and i have installed the new mutt-1.0pre2 release on my linux system. Who can please let me have a .muttrc file to use with these release? Go to http://www.mutt.org/links.html, and you'll find lots of links to user's sites with config samples in their

Threads collapsed by default

1999-09-09 Thread J Horacio MG
How can I have all threads collapsed by default when opening a folder? TIA -- Horacio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valencia - ESPAÑA

No Subject

1999-09-10 Thread J Horacio MG

Re: save-hook

1999-09-13 Thread J Horacio MG
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS dijo: Axel Tillequin: Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail. note: If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail) then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail" in the exim doc...Actually you will just have to write a

Re: german letters in iso-8859-1 Code

1999-09-16 Thread J Horacio MG
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 10:31:09AM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl said: On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 11:02:52PM +0200, Ralf Orlowski wrote: My charset is set to iso-8859-1. But if I receive a mail with german letters like äöüß in it, this letters always just shown as ? in the pager. You either

Re: yes/no nls

1999-09-23 Thread J Horacio MG
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 09:36:41PM +0200, Marius Gedminas said: On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:43:24PM +0400, Alex Kapranoff wrote: Russian charset koi8-r fits nicely into 256 ASCII table. But to answer mutt's question about saving a letter in a mbox I have to toggle Caps, press Russian 'd' for

backtick expansions

1999-09-25 Thread J Horacio MG
Hi, could anyone explain to me what "backtick expansions" are, please? (just for the sake of the manual translation). TIA -- Horacio LC_mutt=es_ES mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://carlotha.ciberia.es/mutt/ ~ Spain ~ Spanje ~

Re: backtick expansions

1999-09-26 Thread J Horacio MG
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 09:09:00PM -0400, Fairlight said: On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 02:41:17AM +0200, J Horacio MG thus spoke: Hi, could anyone explain to me what "backtick expansions" are, please? (just for the sake of the manual translation). Also known by sev

send-hook execution order

1999-09-29 Thread J Horacio MG
Hi, according to the manual: Usage: send-hook [!]pattern command This command can be used to execute arbitrary configuration commands based upon recipients of the message. pattern is a regular expression matching the desired address. command is executed when regexp matches

Re: mutt and GPG - adding new keys (slightly OT)

1999-10-06 Thread J Horacio MG
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 10:17:42AM +0530, Abhay Ghaisas said: Is there any way I can directly add a key that has been sent by somebody to me by email into the key-ring directly from mutt? You must have the following settings: set pgp_gpg=/usr/bin/gpg#where your GnuPG binary

Compile errors: mutt1.0pre3 with compressed folders patch

1999-10-07 Thread J Horacio MG
Hi, this is the first time ever I try to compile mutt. My system is Debian 2.1 (Linux 2.0.36). I followed these steps: - cp and untar/unzip mutt-1.0pre3i.tar.gz to the /tmp directory - cp and gunzip patch-1.0pre3.rr.compressed.2 in the mutt-1.0pre3 dir - apply the patch: patch -p0

Re: Sendmail userid and saving incoming mail

1999-10-08 Thread J Horacio MG
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 11:08:31AM -0500, David DeSimone said: I also tried using the -f option of sendmail, but it generated a warning (something like "lee3 changed userid to acllee using -f option") on all my email. If you want to go that way, you can add your user id to

Re: PGP/GPG

1999-11-23 Thread J Horacio MG
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 06:36:48PM -0500, Bennett Todd said: wget ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/contrib/idea.c wget ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/contrib/rsa.c gcc -Wall -O2 -shared -fPIC -o /usr/lib/gnupg/idea idea.c gcc -Wall -O2 -shared -fPIC -o

[Off Topic] compiling pgp-6.5.1i-beta2.tar.gz

1999-11-25 Thread J Horacio MG
Hi, My apologies for bringing this issue to the list, but I asked around and got no answer, and I believe some people on this list have PGP 6.x installed in a Debian system. I just want to have it sorted out before I install mutt 1.1.1i: I'm having problems compiling pgp-6.5.1i-beta2.tar.gz

Re: [Off Topic] compiling pgp-6.5.1i-beta2.tar.gz

1999-11-25 Thread J Horacio MG
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 11:58:31AM +, Lars Hecking said: I had the same (or a very similar) problem with beta1 on Solaris. Sent them email, but never got a reply. I also emailed to the list, and didn't get a reply. Either the list is dead or the program is dead and no one cares.

Re: [Off Topic] compiling pgp-6.5.1i-beta2.tar.gz

1999-11-25 Thread J Horacio MG
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 02:24:08PM +0100, Thomas Roessler said: On 1999-11-25 14:07:38 +0100, J Horacio MG wrote: And I DO ... it was just for the sake of trying. Well, some weeks ago, 6.5.1i-beta2 built just fine on the Debian system here - I simply followed the instructions. However

Errors compiling 1.0i and 1.1.1i

1999-11-29 Thread J Horacio MG
Hi, `make install' gives me lots of warnings like the following (both for mutt1.0i and 1.1.1i): pop.c:336: warning: ANSI C forbids braced-groups within expressions system specifications: Debian 2.1 (Linux 2.2.10) gcc 2.7.2.3-12 make 3.77-4 the configure flags are:

Both? [Re: ... slang/ncurses?]

1999-11-29 Thread J Horacio MG
This may sound stupid, but I have to know... could I have two different compilations of mutt, so that I can choose to work with the version compiled with slang from the console, and with the v. compiled with ncurses from an xterm? If this makes no sense at all, please, don't even bother to

mutt 1.1.1 : make error

1999-11-30 Thread J Horacio MG
Hi, I'm trying to compile mutt 1.1.1, and am getting the following error while running make: In file included from mutt_menu.h:23, from addrbook.c:20: keymap.h:112: keymap_defs.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [addrbook.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory

Re: A hook for a separate compose window?

1999-12-02 Thread J Horacio MG
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Thomas Roessler said: There is no simple solution for this; you'll have to start a new instance of mutt, or you'll have to play a bit with postpone/reply. On 1999-12-02 11:58:48 +0200, Tom Weckström wrote: I would not like to reinvetn the wheel,

iso-8859-15 [Re: charset bug? @@]

1999-12-02 Thread J Horacio MG
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 03:35:35PM +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS said: The message I'm replying to appeared to demonstrate some kind of charset conversion bug with the mutt from CVS and glibc's character set definition files. I'm attempting to reproduce it with this message. The subject line

Re: window resize bug?

1999-12-14 Thread J Horacio MG
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:14:18AM -0700, shawn a. said: startup mutt, type a !vimenter (it also works when I hit a m), when vim starts up resize the XTerm's window for a bit, this Is where the bug happens for me -- mutt's interface overtakes vim but vim is still running. its like vim