How do I set it up so that if I press save (s) on a mail in one of my
folders, say Mutt-users, the e-mail is appended to the file
+Saved/Mutt-users ?
Now sometimes mutt wants to save the e-mail to a file with the username
of the person who sent it.
Pardon my ignorance.
--
Preben Randhol
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000:
How do I set it up so that if I press save (s) on a mail in one of my
folders, say Mutt-users, the e-mail is appended to the file
+Saved/Mutt-users ?
Something
Ginzel ( 41) |-
As seen in line 123 here. How do I change this behaviour so that I get
my real name instead?
--
Preben Randhol -- [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- [http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/]
"Det eneste trygge stedet i verden er inne i en forte
Anh Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (18:27) :
how do i keep adding my signature when replying? I would like to add it only
when composing a new messgae. Having my signature collect on the bottom gets
annoying sometimes.
First read:
Dave Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:25) :
Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
over quote chars at the start of a new line.
There is no point in sending a load of quoted stuff to anybody. Cut it
down to relevant part before you send. This is
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every minority
problem/consideration we'll never get *anything* done :)
Is it not a minority problem.
Preben
--
() Join
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
[snipped away several quotes that should have been cut down in the
previous post]
And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is that where the
hostile
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (16:50) :
I think the quote is taken a little out of context.
Bandwidth's a bugger on mailing lists huh?
If you get about 1000 overquoted mails a day, it is.
Preben
--
() Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.
Derek D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (18:05) :
See above where Preben said this is not a minority problem. He was
refering to the fact that it is a much BROADER problem than just one
that affects minorities. Your comment is irrelevant to that argument.
(Preben: please
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/01/2002 (00:01) :
It seems they're all LookOut users as well. Where the heck people get
that crap is beyond me.
I thought the program was called LockOut ;-)
Another annoying thing is the 10 line disclaimer from companies that
this is a private e-mail
Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (22:12) :
You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
to just the relevant stuff is _more_ than outweghed by the time saved
to the list members as a whole, not to mention the readability of the
mail archives
René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/01/2002 (12:26) :
Apart from the useful links, you're missing the point. Cameron was
saying that the amount of time spent trimming is _outweighed_ by the
time saved. That means that he means that one _should_ trim!
This is not correct at all. It is
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
responded)
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
There were no
Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (22:02) :
The person was asking for a browser that could handle javascript. The
one you said was 'better' doesn't support Javascript, either.
No he didn't ask for that. He said he used lynx. I said w3m is better,
but it isn't when you use
I have just installed gnupg on my system and set it up. I wonder how
ever why people sign their mails to mailinglists? Perhaps there is
something wrong in my setup because I keep getting:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: tor 24-01-2002 11:56:40 CET) --]
gpg: Signature made ons
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2002 (12:18) :
This has come up at least twice, in great detail, in recent memory.
Check the archives for more so that we don't have to get into it again :-)
Ah I found it in the archive. Sorry should have searched better. And I
also found a way to
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2002 (12:38) :
% also found a way to get rid of this problem with signed posts (which I
% think is unnecessary for ordinary posts).
Without rising to the bait of your latter statement, what did you find as
mentioned in your former statement?
No it
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2002 (12:54) :
Well, once you do, I'm interested in what you find. I understand the
reasoning of the don't sign mailing list posts side and would like to
see things that make their lives easier.
If you don't want to be bothered, then please give me
Drekka mer D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/01/2002 (19:34) :
Sorry I misspelled your name. :) The point is, it's very, very easy
to forge mail to mailing lists (or not to mailing lists, for that
matter). It's much harder to forge a valid, signed mail, because you
need access to the
Derek D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 25/01/2002 (09:25) :
Sure, but if you actually cared, you could get my key and try to
verify it. Presumably, if you cared, you'd already have it, since my
key ID is in my sig, and since you can configure gpg/mutt to get keys
from a keyserver
Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/09/2002 (11:38) :
Is there a way so I can set up a default hook which will be used for
all folders that do not have a special folder-hook? If not I have to
set up folder hooks for all the folders which is a bit cumbersome.
Please ignore my question
21 matches
Mail list logo
