I'm using mutt with mixmaster and gnupg all fine apart from mixmaster .If i
send a mail not forwarded by any mix
chai the mail get delivered right with content , pgp signature and everithing
.If i send it through a mix chai it
gets delivered reporting only the pgp signature and no content,i'm
I fear that code has gone untested and unmaintained for a long time.
On 2007-02-05 17:49:55 +0100, gab bag wrote:
From: gab bag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:49:55 +0100
Subject: Mutt mixmaster gpg pgp
X-Spam-Level:
I'm using mutt with mixmaster
Hi Viktor,
* Viktor Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [24. Jul. 2002]:
David T-G wrote:
...and then Phil Gregory said...
% encrypt-to your key ID
%
% to your ~/.gnupg/options file. This leaves them encrypted on disk but
% still allows you to go back and look at them.
... and allows
Hi Viktor and Rocco,
Viktor wrote:
can't help you with your question, however, I always encrypt messages
with the recipient's key and with my own key.
Yep, that's how I do it, too. :-)
This way, the encrypted messages is stored in my fcc folder, but I'm
still able to read it, because it's
* Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-22 01:59 -0500]:
Is there a way to make mutt save my GPG-Mails unencrypted to disk?
Well, Rocco gave the literal answer to your question, but I think Victor's
approach is the better one (and the one I use). Just add
encrypt-to your key ID
to your
Phil, et al --
...and then Phil Gregory said...
%
...
% encrypt-to your key ID
%
% to your ~/.gnupg/options file. This leaves them encrypted on disk but
% still allows you to go back and look at them.
... and allows anyone who knows your keyid to know that the message has
been encrypted to
Hi Phil,
Phil Gregory wrote:
..., but I think Victor's approach ...
Uhm, it's Viktor.
Ciao,
Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/
msg29835/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi David,
David T-G wrote:
Phil, et al --
...and then Phil Gregory said...
%
...
% encrypt-to your key ID
%
% to your ~/.gnupg/options file. This leaves them encrypted on disk but
% still allows you to go back and look at them.
... and allows anyone who knows your keyid to know
Hi,
* David T-G [02-07-24 02:51:47 +0200] wrote:
...and then Phil Gregory said...
% encrypt-to your key ID
[...]
... and allows anyone who knows your keyid to know that
the message has been encrypted to your key as well,
thereby making the message very not-anonymous. Just so
you're
Bruno, Isaac, et al --
...and then Bruno Lustosa said...
%
% Yes, figured out what you said. Outlook just won't interpret the
% content-disposition: inline and think it's an attachment.
Yep.
%
% Just applied the patch, set pgp_outlook_compat to ask-yes and
% pgp_create_traditional to
Hi,
eh, well I think the subject says it all:
Is there a way to make mutt save my GPG-Mails unencrypted to disk?
I thought I had seen something like that in the mailing list, but now I
can't find it anymore.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
Andy.
--
http://peru.spiegl.de Our
Hi Andy,
can't help you with your question, however, I always encrypt messages
with the recipient's key and with my own key. This way, the encrypted
messages is stored in my fcc folder, but I'm still able to read it,
because it's encrypted with my own key.
Ciao,
Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi,
* Andy Spiegl [02-07-22 18:59:13 +0200] wrote:
Is there a way to make mutt save my GPG-Mails unencrypted
to disk? I thought I had seen something like that in the
mailing list, but now I can't find it anymore.
Sounds like you're looking for ``set fcc_clear''.
bye, Rocco
hello,
just to say that I finally win :)
I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;)
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:50PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
[clip]
Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I
force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
just to say that I finally win :)
I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;)
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:50PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I
force my
Philip, et al --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
%
% just to say that I finally win :)
% I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;)
Yay! Good job :-)
...
% I used mutt a few months ago but gave up on it because I
Just picking a random point here...
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 05:04:22AM -0500 I heard the voice of
Philip Mak, and lo! it spake thus:
I think that mutt is a good e-mail client, but the default configuration
is sub-optimal (vim doesn't format paragraphs well by default, some of the
Well, vim
Thus spake Benjamin Michotte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015
and/or 3156.
Yes. Mutt is in the minority for doing this, but it's now the right
way, especially for non-US character sets.
Some friends use mua as kmail which still use
Justin R. Miller wrote:
Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I
force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is difficult ;p)
Yes. Try 'pgp_create_traditional', optionally with the Outlook
compatibility patch. It will change the content-type so that Outlook
Thus spake Viktor Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in
us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set,
pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work
around (look at the archives).
Agreed. Sorry I
Benjamin Michotte wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:19:49AM, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in
us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set,
pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work
around
Hello,
when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015
and/or 3156.
Some friends use mua as kmail which still use PGP in line as described
in RFC 1991 and receive my mails signed/crypted as attachments.
Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:19:49AM, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in
us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set,
pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work
around (look at the archives).
Ok, so,
Zane, et al --
...and then Zane Crawford said...
% Short version:
% ==
% I want my Mutt setup to by default, NOT use PGP/MIME - it confuses too many of
Short answer:
set $pgp_create_traditional (so that mutt uses the pgp_clearsign_command)
and, if you wish to converse freely with
On (23/08/01 14:43), Josh Huber wrote:
I suspect that his version of libc wasn't new enough, so apt wants to
upgrade it, pulling in a shit ton of other upgrades. should work fine
though :)
His?
that's what you get for running sid (or maybe woody?)
What should I run?
OK, more specific:
On (22/08/01 19:03), Justin R. Miller wrote:
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
. . . mutt tells me, just below the status bar, that PGP signature
could NOT be verified.
Although it has, in fact, been verified.
Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug?
If you're using
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just upgraded to Mutt 1.3.20i (2001-07-24) and still have the same
problem.
Hmm, I wonder if it's related to this, but still affected 1.3.20?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/20007
-Justin
--
[ ] -- Justin R. Miller -
On (24/08/01 10:39), Justin R. Miller wrote:
Hmm, I wonder if it's related to this, but still affected 1.3.20?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/20007
Setting this worked.
set pgp_good_sign=^gpg: Good signature from
Many thanks!
Ailbhe
--
Homepage:
On Thursday, 23 August 2001 at 18:24, Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
On (22/08/01 19:03), Justin R. Miller wrote:
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug?
If you're using 1.3.18 as your mail headers say, then I'd recommend
you try 1.3.20 or 1.3.21,
Ailbhe Leamy mutt [23/08/01 18:24 +0100]:
# apt-get install mutt
Reading Package Lists... Done
cd /usr/ports/mail/mutt-devel
make install clean
Less than ten minutes on my (extremely thin) pipe to the 'net
hth
--suresh
[yes, you have to switch to freebsd, but that's a minor detail g]
Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Version: 1.3.20-1
Replaces: mutt-i
Provides: mail-reader
Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-7), libncurses5 (= 5.2.20010310-1),
^^
libsasl7, exim | mail-transport-agent
Recommends: mime-support
Suggests: i18ndata, urlview, ispell,
On (23/08/01 23:38), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Ailbhe Leamy mutt [23/08/01 18:24 +0100]:
# apt-get install mutt Reading Package Lists... Done
cd /usr/ports/mail/mutt-devel make install clean
[yes, you have to switch to freebsd, but that's a minor detail g]
I'm way too lazy to look
So.
When I receive a gpg-signed and -encrypted mail, and gpg gives me the
result . . .
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed 22 Aug 2001 18:53:27 BST) --]
gpg: encrypted with 1536-bit ELG-E key, ID D289D3A4, created 1999-11-25
Person One [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: encrypted with
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
. . . mutt tells me, just below the status bar, that
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
Although it has, in fact, been verified.
Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug?
If you're using 1.3.18 as your mail headers say, then I'd recommend you
How do you request Mutt to show if the email has a GPG/PGP
authentication/identification key attached to it?
I would like to see it in the main menu and when I open the email.
Thank you in advance for any help.
--
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.home.net/subba9/
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:47:25AM +, Subba Rao wrote:
How do you request Mutt to show if the email has a GPG/PGP
authentication/identification key attached to it?
It shows an S for signed mails and a K for an attached key.
P for encrypted.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I am currently using the following two macros to do things with unknown
PGP/GPG key ids:
macro pager P "!gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.us.pgp.net --recv-key 0x" "Get PGP
Key"
macro pager L "!gpg --lsign-key 0x" "Sign PGP Key"
Is there a way to automatically get the key id from the message, so I
just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:24:34AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Since you're using gpg.rc, just make sure that pgp_clearsign_command
(see 6.3.120) is set correctly and then set pgp_create_traditional
(see 6.3.115) and you're off (but we'll all
Emre --
...and then emre said...
% Hi,
%
% I'm using mutt-1.2.5i with the gpg.rc stuff in my ~/.muttrc. My
% question is:
% Is there a way to make mutt not attach PGP signed/encrypted files?
Yes.
% My old MUA would insert the signed text right into the message
% with the "BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Tuesday den 13.06.2000 um 6:07 CEST +0200, schrieb Dale Morris:
Figured I'd better seek help before I start fixing things.. I am using gpg
for encryption in mutt. It seems to work fine. Tonight I installed pgp
6.5.3 on the wife's machine and sent myself an email, encrypted, of
course. Mutt
Figured I'd better seek help before I start fixing things.. I am using gpg
for encryption in mutt. It seems to work fine. Tonight I installed pgp
6.5.3 on the wife's machine and sent myself an email, encrypted, of
course. Mutt didn't decrypt it. I sent her an encrypted/signed mail and
her box
Soemtimes, when I type my passphrase, I mistype - it's ~fifty characters
long, so it's not *that* unexpected. Anyway. Mutt never asks me to re-issue
the passphrase if GPG reports back a bad passphrase. Is there anyway bar
quitting out of mutt, or to go into the PGP menu, select "Sign (a)s", and
John P . Looney writes:
Soemtimes, when I type my passphrase, I mistype - it's ~fifty characters
long, so it's not *that* unexpected. Anyway. Mutt never asks me to re-issue
the passphrase if GPG reports back a bad passphrase. Is there anyway bar
quitting out of mutt, or to go into the PGP
Hello !
John P . Looney wrote on 01.12.1999 11:07:15 +:
Soemtimes, when I type my passphrase, I mistype - it's ~fifty characters
long, so it's not *that* unexpected. Anyway. Mutt never asks me to re-issue
the passphrase if GPG reports back a bad passphrase. Is there anyway bar
quitting
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 11:07:15AM +, John P . Looney wrote:
Soemtimes, when I type my passphrase, I mistype - it's ~fifty characters
long, so it's not *that* unexpected. Anyway. Mutt never asks me to re-issue
the passphrase if GPG reports back a bad passphrase. Is there anyway bar
45 matches
Mail list logo
