On Thursday 5 July 2018 23:17,
Erik Christiansen put forth the proposition:
> On 05.07.18 13:39, David Woodfall wrote:
> > I've noticed now that my replies in that thread don't have a
> > In-Reply-To for some reason. When I tag one and attach it with & as
> > you said it joins fine and adds that.
On 05.07.18 13:39, David Woodfall wrote:
> I've noticed now that my replies in that thread don't have a
> In-Reply-To for some reason. When I tag one and attach it with & as
> you said it joins fine and adds that.
>
> Why wouldn't mutt add that? It works fine eg in lists.
It's ticked over 23:00
On Thursday 5 July 2018 22:20,
Erik Christiansen put forth the proposition:
> On 05.07.18 12:53, David Woodfall wrote:
> > I've just set up things so that record=^ which works fine, and I
> > copied a bunch of old sent messages to a folder to see the whole
> > thread. However I see the thread
On 05.07.18 12:53, David Woodfall wrote:
> I've just set up things so that record=^ which works fine, and I
> copied a bunch of old sent messages to a folder to see the whole
> thread. However I see the thread order is broken.
OK, we have "set sort=threads", as the above implies some threads
I've just set up things so that record=^ which works fine, and I
copied a bunch of old sent messages to a folder to see the whole
thread. However I see the thread order is broken.
I tried setting strict_threads but it doesn't help.
EG I have a thread with a friend (he uses the email app in
