On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, at 17:38, David Lowry-Duda wrote:
> Threading is amazing, it's true. It's something that mutt does correctly
> and the big webmails don't do correctly.
Correction, it's something any other mail client simply does not in any
bearable way. It's just so nice and tidy in mutt.
> I recently upgraded my work workstation from RHEL6 to Ubuntu 20.04,
> so was able to move from mutt 1.5.20 to 1.13.2 ... and now I have
> threading!
Threading is amazing, it's true. It's something that mutt does correctly
and the big webmails don't do correctly.
- DLD
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:55:46AM -0400, Andrew D. Arenson wrote:
> I recently upgraded my work workstation from RHEL6 to Ubuntu 20.04, so
> was able to move from mutt 1.5.20 to 1.13.2 ... and now I have
> threading!
Threading has been part of Mutt since I can remember; maybe your default
config
I recently upgraded my work workstation from RHEL6 to Ubuntu 20.04, so
was able to move from mutt 1.5.20 to 1.13.2 ... and now I have threading!
I know it's still far behind the latest versions, but it's very
exciting, and I'm very thankful.
Andy
--
Andrew D. Arenson (he/him)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:01:50AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
I have that archived somehwere here, if anyone wants me to post a
copy, put it online, etc. Just remember, put your coffee down
before you read it or C|NK will be the result (that's another
one from ASR---coffee, piped through the
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:29:33PM +0100, Joe McCool wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, stargr...@stargrave.org wrote:
Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors, and user
community. Mutt is a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
Joining in! Really, Mutt is absolutely the
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:17:59AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
As will I. :-)
Forgot one thing: I've been using Mutt since right around the time
it went from alpha to beta status, ca 1995, I think, and have never
had even the slightest regret. It has, simply, always been the
best for me.
On
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:00:28AM +0200, Andre Kl?rner wrote:
Well, what do you mean with that? I also noticed that sometimes the
fullscreen running mutt looks a bit unusual when you use 80 of your 250
columns. But how would you think could one make it better?
I'm not sure what you're
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:11:03AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 24Jul2012 15:20, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
| - No ability to change signatures when changing accounts automatically.
Well, mutt doesn't have accounts. It has individual settings for a
bunch of things,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:33:13AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:17:59AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
On one list I'm on (the Chile-Heads list, fwiw), from time to time the
topic of replying to the list will come up, and the fact that most have
to do a reply-all to reply to
I used Mutt stable years ago and for whatever reasons, too many email
accounts I guess, I got away from it. Using the development version recently
has been such a pleasure. Everything works as expected and there are lots of
nice features. More than I will ever use. It's perfect when you have a lot
Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors, and user community. Mutt is
a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
Joining in! Really, Mutt is absolutely the best email client and there
is nothing at all that sucks in it! No Mutt → no email → computer is not
needed ☺. Big thanks to all developers!
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, stargr...@stargrave.org wrote:
Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors, and user community. Mutt is
a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
Joining in! Really, Mutt is absolutely the best email client and there
is nothing at all that sucks in it! No Mutt
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:29:33PM +0100, Joe McCool wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, stargr...@stargrave.org wrote:
Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors, and user community. Mutt
is
a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
Joining in! Really, Mutt is absolutely the best
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:12:22PM +, John Long wrote:
Mutt is a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
Hmmm. I'm going to disagree a bit. I think Mutt is a fine MUA, and I use it
for all of my personal and professional mail, but it definitely has some
baggage that sucks.
- IMAP support
Hi Aaron,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:20:29PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:12:22PM +, John Long wrote:
Mutt is a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
Hmmm. I'm going to disagree a bit. I think Mutt is a fine MUA, and I use it
for all of my personal and
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:19:30PM +0400, stargr...@stargrave.org wrote:
Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors, and user community. Mutt is
a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
Joining in! Really, Mutt is absolutely the best email client and there
is nothing at all that sucks in it!
On 24Jul2012 15:20, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:12:22PM +, John Long wrote:
| Mutt is a great app! It doesn't suck at all.
|
| Hmmm. I'm going to disagree a bit. [...]
| - Local commands, such as 'c' to change mailboxes, can take ages, even
|
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:12:22PM +, John Long wrote:
Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors...
Some years back, I acquired a web buddy, one Mae Ling Mak, a collumnist
for the late Maximum Linux magazine. She was then and is now a Mutt
Girl. I didn't understand her logic at
Hi, thank you all,
Now it's easier for me to do mailing experiments. :)
charlie
Thank you for the help!
Here's another question :)
Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?
I'll be very glad if you answer me !
Thank you!
Peter!
Peter Dobrev proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Thank you for the help!
Here's another question :)
Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?
mutt can't use any specific smtp server ... configure whatever MTA you are
running on that box (sendmail, postfix, qmail) to smarthost
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:08:34PM -0200, Peter Dobrev wrote:
Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?
No. Mutt always uses a program to send it's mail. That program does talk to
servers via SMTP, if needed.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Engineer
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 02:21:58PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:08:34PM -0200, Peter Dobrev wrote:
Well is there any way to configure Mutt to use a STMP server?
No. Mutt always uses a program to send it's mail. That program does talk to
servers via SMTP, if
David Merrill proclaimed on mutt-users that:
There is a very thin MTA available that is designed to shuffle your
request off to some other SMTP server. I don't remember what it's
called atm, but such a creature does exist. I think I read about it in
the mutt docs somewhere, but I can't seem
Thank you all.
-Manuel
26 matches
Mail list logo
