On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 01:45:53PM +0100, Gero Treuner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:39:20PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > ...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
> > % Not really an option, but a supported method would be to set up a
> > % folder hook in your .muttrc, which matches all folders:
>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:39:20PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
> % Not really an option, but a supported method would be to set up a
> % folder hook in your .muttrc, which matches all folders:
> %
> % folder-hook . 'push "1"'
If Aleksey meant to start with the
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 07:52:00AM +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> I would prefer to name the jump function directly instead of
> relying on the key binding of "1":
> folder-hook . 'push 1'
Thanks for that. I had some macros to get back to the appropriate
mailbox in the mailbox screen when I exit
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 15:39:20 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Do I incorrectly remember a point_new variable that would cause mutt to
> jump to the first new message, which is what most people want anyway but
> some don't, which is now obviously not there? Or did I make it up? :-)
I'm not sure, but
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 22:52:31 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>
> Why is it a kludge? It works, it's quite simple, and it doesn't seem to
> add a significant overhead in the folder processing.. Maybe that you
> need to use "push" is a bit kludgey, since I couldn't figure out a way
> to invoke t
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 17:22:01 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Well, it's noticeable to me; mutt opens up the folder, paints the index,
> and then has to re-paint it from message 1. Even with "modern" fast
> dialup lines, which don't always apply even for me here in the states,
> it's quite noticeabl
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> folder-hook . 'push "1"'
A bit more efficient:
folder-hook . 'push '
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that h
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 20 Mar 2000:
> Well, it's noticeable to me; mutt opens up the folder, paints the index,
> and then has to re-paint it from message 1. Even with "modern" fast
> dialup lines, which don't always apply even for me here in the states,
> it's quite noticeabl
Mikko --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 20 Mar 2000:
% > % folder-hook . 'push "1"'
% >
% > This is all I could come up with, too, but it's IMHO a kludge.
%
% Why is it a kludge? It works, it's quite simple, and it doesn't seem to
% add a sig
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 20 Mar 2000:
> % folder-hook . 'push "1"'
>
> This is all I could come up with, too, but it's IMHO a kludge.
Why is it a kludge? It works, it's quite simple, and it doesn't seem to
add a significant overhead in the folder processing.. Maybe that yo
Hi, folks --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% Aleksey Tsalolikhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 20 Mar 2000:
% > of message 1 when I start mutt. Is there an option to have
% > the indicator go to message 1 at startup that I've missed
%
% Not really an option, but a supported method woul
Aleksey Tsalolikhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 20 Mar 2000:
> However, the indicator goes to message 300, instead
> of message 1 when I start mutt. Is there an option to have
> the indicator go to message 1 at startup that I've missed
> in the manual? If not, is there any other way t
Hi,
I want to read my mail FIFO (ie oldest mail first).
I don't have any "set sort" commands in my .muttrc, so
mutt's defaulting to "date", which is just fine.
However, the indicator goes to message 300, instead
of message 1 when I start mutt. Is there an option to have
the indi
13 matches
Mail list logo
