Re: send-hook and subject
+[ Asi hablaba Aaron Schrab ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | | At 16:39 -0300 20 Aug 2002, Fernan Aguero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: |Is it possible to use a send hook to set the subject? | | No. To quote the manual: | | ] Note: the send-hook's are only executed ONCE after getting the initial | ] list of recipients. Adding a recipient after replying or editing the | ] message will NOT cause any send-hook to be executed. Also note that | ] my_hdr commands which modify recipient headers, or the message's | ] subject, don't have any effect on the current message when executed | ] from a send-hook. | +] Thanks Martin and Aaron. Setting/unsetting autoedit does not help. I had already tried that, and edit_headers also ... Seems that it is not possible. I will stop experimenting. Still I'm curious why once in a very while, the subject will get set by the send hook ... a bug? Thanks for your reply, Fernan -- F e r n a n A g u e r o http://genoma.unsam.edu.ar/~fernan -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GS d- s:+ a C++ BU++ P+++ L- E- W+++ N o? K? w- !O M+ !V PS+ PE Y+ PGP t- 5? X- R- tv+ b++ DI+ !D G e h r+++ y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
Re: send-hook and subject
* Fernan Aguero [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-21 10.51 -0300]: This is weird. I have 'unset autoedit' in my muttrc, and the send-hook 'send-hook @visit\.se$ my_hdr Subject: shazam! However, it doesn't work unless I specifically type :unset autoeditenter in mutt. Strange. Is this just me? Can anyone verify this? -- _ Martin Karlsson ( ) \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \Against HTML and proprietary attachments in e-mail msg30410/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
send-hook and subject
Send-Hooks, and the Subject, revisited. ___ I have asked a similar question before, with no clear answer. I will try to rephrase it. I hope that perhaps some developer is reading, and can say 'this is not possible' or 'it should be possible'. Now, the question: Is it possible to use a send hook to set the subject? My common sense tells me it is possible. However, I have tried several combinations of send-hooks without success. Examples: send-hook '~t ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]$' 'my_hdr Subject: [test] ' send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'my_hdr Subject: [test] ' ... This does not result in the subject line set to start with [test] as expected. However, and strangely enough, every one in a hundred messages or so (i.e. very infrequently) the subject line will start with [test], even though I'm not sending the message to the magic incantation of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using 'unmy_hdr Subject' or not doesn't appear to affect this behaviour. Perhaps my_hdr can be used with other headers, but not with the subject. I'm not a developer myself, so I cannot read mutt's sources and figure this out, but I guess it should be possible ... right? I've tried several options to make mutt avoid asking for the subject upon hitting 'm' to start a new message. No change. Upon searching google with 'unmy_hdr Subject:' I see that most of the hits are to documents with the words 'unmy_hdr' and 'Subject' not connected (not near). One document, however contains the following send-hook (it's from a mailing list archive): send-hook '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' \ 'set mime_forward ; set pgp_autosign=no ; set editor=/bin/true ; \ my_hdr Fcc: /dev/null ; my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; my_hdr Subject: spam ; \ push y' However, a comment on top of the send-hook says: # mystery: The subject isn't being set. Why?!? We're two now. Any idea why the Subject header doesn't like being set this way? Thanks in advance, Fernan. -- F e r n a n A g u e r o http://genoma.unsam.edu.ar/~fernan -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GS d- s:+ a C++ BU++ P+++ L- E- W+++ N o? K? w- !O M+ !V PS+ PE Y+ PGP t- 5? X- R- tv+ b++ DI+ !D G e h r+++ y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
Re: send-hook and subject
* Fernan Aguero [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-20 16.39 -0300]: Hi Fernan. Is it possible to use a send hook to set the subject? Yes, but you must have 'unset autoedit' in your muttrc; if not set, there isn't any data for the send-hook to work with. HTH -- _ Martin Karlsson ( ) \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \Against HTML and proprietary attachments in e-mail msg30386/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: send-hook and subject
At 16:39 -0300 20 Aug 2002, Fernan Aguero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to use a send hook to set the subject? No. To quote the manual: ] Note: the send-hook's are only executed ONCE after getting the initial ] list of recipients. Adding a recipient after replying or editing the ] message will NOT cause any send-hook to be executed. Also note that ] my_hdr commands which modify recipient headers, or the message's ] subject, don't have any effect on the current message when executed ] from a send-hook. -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.schrab.com/aaron/ Besides, including std_ice_cubes.h is a fatal error on machines that don't have it yet. Bad language design, there... :-)--Larry Wall
Re: send-hook and subject
* Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-21 03.02 +0200]: Yes, but you must have 'unset autoedit' in your muttrc; if not set, there isn't any data for the send-hook to work with. s/unset/set And it doesn't work if you're replying, only when you write a new mail. I think. -- _ Martin Karlsson ( ) \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \Against HTML and proprietary attachments in e-mail msg30388/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: send-hook and subject
* Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-21 03.19 +0200]: * Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-21 03.02 +0200]: Yes, but you must have 'unset autoedit' in your muttrc; if not set, there isn't any data for the send-hook to work with. s/unset/set And it doesn't work if you're replying, only when you write a new mail. I think. I need a vacation. Just ignore me. *sigh* -- _ Martin Karlsson ( ) \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \Against HTML and proprietary attachments in e-mail msg30389/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
