On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 17:40:38 -0800, Larry Lipstone wrote:
I find with my mutt-1.0i running on UnixWare 2.1.3, with TERM=dtterm,
every time the timeout (or whatever) period expires and it checks for
new mail, the program emits a "make cursor visible", then stat()'s the
mail drop, then
Hi!
Is it possible to setup complex hooks? For example, I want
send-hook working only in one mailbox. I've tried such settings:
folder-hook . my_hdr From: addr1
folder-hook mbox2 my_hdr From: addr2
send-hook domain.org my_hdr From: addr3
Or:
folder-hook . my_hdr From: addr1
folder-hook mbox2
Nick Jennings schrieb:
Since I started using Mutt, I stopped developing this mail
client, but now I might start again, or maybe add this feature to mutt, is
there a reason why this is something that is continuously not a feature in
UNIX mail clients? yes procmail is powerfull, but its far too
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 02:56:44PM -0800, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
:
: newmail-hook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) +mutt-users-mail
What's so hard about:
:0:
* ^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mutt-users-mail
I really don't think that was too hard.
And if he still thinks it's too hard, he can
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 03:28:30PM -0800, Nick Jennings wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 02:56:44PM -0800, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
It's not a feature because it's not the job of a mail client to deliver
mail. There are a lot of things mail clients don't do - delivering mail
is one of
On 2000-01-12 16:08:06 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
I've read the online documentation at www.mutt.org and I cant find specific
information on how to get new mail put in folders based on patterns. can
Mutt doesn't do this. Setup something like procmail.
Actually I think you can use
Matthew Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2000:
There seems to be a lot of detractors to the requested functionality,
however there's at least one valid case that mutt can be in where the
functionality is quite useful. This is when the spoolfile is an IMAP
INBOX folder.
To me
Nick --
...and then Nick Jennings said...
%
% there a reason why this is something that is continuously not a feature in
% UNIX mail clients? yes procmail is powerfull, but its far too much of a
Simple: in the UNIX world, little tools that do a few things, or just one
thing, *very*well* get
Mikko, et al --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% Nick Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 12 Jan 2000:
% I've read the online documentation at www.mutt.org and I cant find specific
% information on how to get new mail put in folders based on patterns.
%
% Mutt doesn't do this, it's
This is off topic, sorta. :-)
I created a *mutt compatible* mailing list which sends out the Dilbert, User
Friendly and GPF comics every morning. The message is in text with an html
attachment. You'll need your mailcap/mime.types set to handle html files
(probably lynx) and jpg/gif files
Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Nick Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 12 Jan 2000:
Argh! I despise procmail, yes its powerfull, and can do alot, but
it's severly anoying.
...
yes procmail is powerfull, but its far too much of a
hassle for just setting up a simple filter,
You could
If you find procmail too hard to use, you might also look at maildrop.
Another plus is that it works with Maildir mailboxes without patches.
The filtering rules are quite readable.
HTH,
Jeffrey
Hello out there!
I'm new with mutt and now having some problems. I was using
Outlook up to now (now flames please) and I miss some features,
it's neither mouse nor clicking or colour- just handling
different mailboxes.
I set up some procmail rules like
:0
* ^TOmutt-user
mutt-user
and that puts
2000-01-13-07:18:21 Matthew Hawkins:
There seems to be a lot of detractors to the requested
functionality, however there's at least one valid case that mutt
can be in where the functionality is quite useful. This is when
the spoolfile is an IMAP INBOX folder. That folder could get mail
Matthew Hawkins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On 2000-01-12 16:08:06 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
I've read the online documentation at www.mutt.org and I cant find specific
information on how to get new mail put in folders based on patterns. can
Mutt doesn't do this. Setup something
Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try running procmail on a mail server you don't have an account on
and your mailbox isn't actually physically owned by you anyway :)
I have email from a _lot_ of places coming in to my mail server.
Then I have fetchmail pull it down from there. I like my
2000-01-13-05:27:26 Byrial Jensen:
I see the problem. The attached patch should avoid the changes of
the visibility of the cursor after timeouts. (I hope it does, but
I cannot see the difference on my screen, so please test).
The patch is usable on both the stable (1.0) and unstable (1.1.2)
Scott V. McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems
like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system
when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but immediately
send mail to my isp's smtp server.
Try
Scott V. McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems
like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system
when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but immediately
send mail to my isp's smtp server.
What if
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 05:15:01PM +0300, Sergei Kolobov wrote:
Mikko H?nninen wrote:
Nick Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 12 Jan 2000:
Argh! I despise procmail, yes its powerfull, and can do alot, but
it's severly anoying.
...
yes procmail is powerfull, but its far too
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 01:54:30PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Scott V. McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems
like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system
when all I need is a program to look like
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 05:10:20PM +0100, Volker Tanner wrote:
Hello out there!
Hi!
I'm new with mutt and now having some problems. I was using
Outlook up to now (now flames please) and I miss some features,
it's neither mouse nor clicking or colour- just handling
different
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott V. McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems
like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system
when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but immediately
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 11:23:37AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
I understand procmail doesn't go with IMAP at this point. But that doesn't
mean it makes sense for Mutt to do it. It's still the MDAs job to deliver
mail. As someone else mentioned, something should be written for IMAP to
I have a setup that is a holdover from my MH days whereby I use procmail
to sort my mail into different "incoming" folders, and then I invoke an
external command to put mail from these inboxes into the mailbox
I actually read out of when I am ready for that set of mail (at which point
it may get
Byrial Jensen wrote...
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 17:40:38 -0800, Larry Lipstone wrote:
I find with my mutt-1.0i running on UnixWare 2.1.3, with TERM=dtterm,
every time the timeout (or whatever) period expires and it checks for
new mail, the program emits a "make cursor visible", then
Mutt is supposed to automatically detect Maildir-format mailboxes.. however,
when I fire it up (v.1.0), it just gives me an error of
"/var/spool/mail/mrbill: No such file or directory (errno = 2)".
I've added the following line to my .muttrc:
set mbox_type="Maildir"
and it still does the same
I have a setup that is a holdover from my MH days whereby I use procmail
to sort my mail into different "incoming" folders, and then I invoke an
external command to put mail from these inboxes into the mailbox
I actually read out of when I am ready for that set of mail (at which point
it may get
On 2000-01-13 12:54:07 -0500, Bennett Todd wrote:
2000-01-13-12:50:49 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS:
Nice, but some people want to leave mail on the server so that
they can access it from other places as well.
Not only that, take a corporate situation where the mail could be
sensitive - you don't
Here are the lines of my ~/.muttrc that might be significant at all:
===
set alternates="markm|al278|mark\@.*mielke"
set nometoo # Should we include ourself in To:/CC: lists?
set nomenu_scroll# Should we scroll one line at a time?
set allow_8bit # 8-bit ok? or 7-bit +
Jeffrey L . Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2000:
If you find procmail too hard to use, you might also look at maildrop.
Another plus is that it works with Maildir mailboxes without patches.
The latest version of procmail (out a month or few ago) has native
support for maildirs.
The `lists' command specifies the mailing lists to which you are subscribed.
Since the purpose of the mail-followup-to field is to affect a group reply,
there is no reason to put your own email address in there since you are
already a member of the list (which is included in m-f-t).
me
PGP
Bill Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti 13. tammikuuta 2000 (to):
Mutt is supposed to automatically detect Maildir-format mailboxes..
It does. :-)
however,
when I fire it up (v.1.0), it just gives me an error of
"/var/spool/mail/mrbill: No such file or directory (errno = 2)".
This means
Hi,
Is it possible to send a signed message using mutt and pgp5 from
the command line??
Thanks.
Shao.
--
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _
Department of Communications
Hi,
I have two general mail questions:
1. can it be guaranteed that _EVERY_ email has a message-id?
2. if not, can you generate a message-id?
Background: I'd like to write a perl script whose input is a
mail folder, and the script looks at each individual email's
message-id and do something
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 12:38:05PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
Is it possible to send a signed message using mutt and pgp5 from
the command line??
Not in batch mode, but you could do something like
mutt -e 'set pgp_autosign' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to get a one time pgp signature.
Ok, thanks, now the question is a bit off topic.
I tried to use a perl script to automate this, here is the code:
use PGP::Sign;
$PGP::Sign::PGPPATH = "/root/.pgp";
open(DATA, "$path/mutt.header.$$");
@data = DATA;
close DATA;
$keyid = "dns\@cia.com.au";
$passphrase = "hello world";
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 06:31:37PM -0800, Robert Chien wrote:
1. can it be guaranteed that _EVERY_ email has a message-id?
No.
2. if not, can you generate a message-id?
Background: I'd like to write a perl script whose input is a
mail folder, and the script looks at each individual
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 01:52:16PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
now, the emails looks the exactly the same as the old style PGP signed
message, but when I view it in mutt, mutt shows that it is just a normal
message. Do I need to add additional header info such as Content-Type??
Or the above
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2000:
You can generate an ID for them. But you shouldn't really use message ID to
detect duplicates, although its a common practice. Message IDs are supposed
to be unique, but sometimes aren't. If you want to do it properly, generate
a
Michael Elkins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 01:52:16PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
now, the emails looks the exactly the same as the old style PGP signed
message, but when I view it in mutt, mutt shows that it is just a normal
message. Do I need to add additional header
41 matches
Mail list logo
