On Mon, 04 Mar 2002, 20:54, Sven Guckes wrote:
is this for *all* mails in your mailbox? or just for *some*?
please dont tell us that you only tried it on one message
which contains a text/html part only and that your mailcap
file tells mutt to use lynx but cannot be found ;-)
No, all
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, 09:25, Raymond A Meijer wrote:
have you tried linking mutt with slang yet?
I think so, but I'll try again and let you know what happens
Hmmmall I get then is coloured barsit looks nice, but I still can't
see the messages :)
Ray
--
Hello mutt-users,
I'm using set pgp_create_traditional=yes in my .muttrc to send
encrypted/signed E-Mails to Outlook-users (this client obviously isn't
RFC 2015-compatible). In addition I use the pgp-traditional patch from
Dale Woolridge for forcing text/plain content.
Is it possible to use
On 2002-03-05 Heiko Heil wrote:
Hello mutt-users,
I'm using set pgp_create_traditional=yes in my .muttrc to send
encrypted/signed E-Mails to Outlook-users (this client obviously isn't
RFC 2015-compatible). In addition I use the pgp-traditional patch from
Dale Woolridge for forcing
* David Collantes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020304 17:09]:
Does anyone knows how to view folders on more than one
column? Right now it shows one column only, but when
you have a lot of mailboxes that gets quite long...
multicolumn output has not been implemented yet.
one column is all you get for
* Raymond A. Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020305 09:14]:
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, 09:25, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
have you tried linking mutt with slang yet?
I think so, but I'll try again and let you know what happens...
Hmmm..all I get then is coloured bars..
it looks nice, but I still can't
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:08:39PM -0500, MuttER wrote:
* David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-04-02 15:55] crowed:
Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to happen specifically when I have input more than 8
characters, which is usual for filenames with full paths and email
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-03-02 02:07 AM EST]:
I am looking to add an extra header to my outgoing mails if there is an
attachment. I tried the following macro:
macro compose a :my_hdr: X-Attachment: Safe\nattach-file
But it seems that at that point headers can not be added
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:23:03AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
* David Collantes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020304 17:09]:
Does anyone knows how to view folders on more than one
column? Right now it shows one column only, but when
you have a lot of mailboxes that gets quite long...
multicolumn output
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:05:05AM -0500, David Collantes wrote:
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-03-02 02:07 AM EST]:
I am looking to add an extra header to my outgoing mails if there is an
attachment. I tried the following macro:
macro compose a :my_hdr: X-Attachment:
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-03-02 06:30 AM EST]:
That recommendation does not works neither. I think that when you are at
that point -email already composed- it is not possible to add any extra
headers. They need to be added 'before' you enter message compossing. IN
Oh, you're
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:19:36AM -0500, MuttER wrote:
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-05-02 06:45] crowed:
multicolumn output has not been implemented yet.
one column is all you get for now. sorry.
anyway, mutt builds up the list of all
my folders in less than two seconds -
and
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, 11:25, Sven Guckes wrote:
$ mv $HOME/mailcap $HOME/mailcapremoved
$ mutt
what now?
The same
try with TERM=vt100, too:
$ TERM=vt100
$ export TERM
$ mutt
Nostill a blank screen, in BW now
Strange huh? :)
Ray
--
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/05 15:41]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8hNitWH8M1wI2iFcRApO/AJwOFPUVJn3wxcP8r26eeANYGT7fdgCgklRs
3c1l651J0OaZ86L/ae2phjE=
=+SPC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
* Thomas Huemmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-03-02 09:46 AM EST]:
...and now for something completely different:
Sorry, if I do not add something more genuine to this thread. But could
you please send your gpg signature to a public keyserver or stop signing
your messages. Just because every
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:07:50PM +0100, Thomas Huemmler wrote:
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/05 15:41]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8hNitWH8M1wI2iFcRApO/AJwOFPUVJn3wxcP8r26eeANYGT7fdgCgklRs
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
gpg --verbose --keyserver certserverpgpcom --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
Use something like keyserver wwwkeysukpgpnet in your options
file, where uk would be your country
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park,
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-05-02 10:25] crowed:
report back if it works?
I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com. I've also successfully
retrieved my key from this server. Is this one not in the rotation?
Is there some other server I should be using? I have successfully
Hi!
Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (125) I have
now switched to mutt-1327i-11rhl6 (linked from wwwmuttorg) and
have discovered that my outgoing messages have garbled charsets (and
umlaut letters are displayed as question marks in incoming messages)
I don't even know
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:10:54AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
gkrellmmailwatch is one solution to this.
http://gkrellm.luon.net/mailwatch.phtml,
Thanks a lot. It's great I could have such feature integrated in
gkrellm... I'm going to check it in a moment...
--
_.|._ |_ _.: Adam
* MuttER [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020305 16:28]:
I also cannot retrieve your key:
pat@wahoo:~ gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys \
587F0CD702368857
gpg: requesting key 02368857 from certserver.pgp.com ...
gpg: can't get key from keyserver: eof
Odd:
mdb@cyclone:~/$ gpg
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020305 16:49]:
Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (1.2.5). I have
now switched to mutt-1.3.27i-1.1.rhl6 (linked from www.mutt.org) and
have discovered that my outgoing messages have garbled charsets (and
umlaut letters are displayed as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said John Buttery on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600:
gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
That worked for me. I use pgp.dtype.org, though, and it wasn't there.
- --
[!] Justin R. Miller [EMAIL
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-05 09:24 -0600]:
This is really odd; you're not the first person to say this, but I
_did_ upload it to a keyserver, not only that but I have successfully
retrieved it as well.
I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com.
It looks like that server is
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-03-02 10:27 AM EST]:
Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (1.2.5). I have
now switched to mutt-1.3.27i-1.1.rhl6 (linked from www.mutt.org) and
Please check the whole thread starting with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. The fix is there.
Cheers,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:02:55AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Said John Buttery on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600:
gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
That worked for me. I use pgp.dtype.org, though, and it wasn't there.
--
[!] Justin R.
I'm not sure I used the correct terminology in the Subject: line, but
what I'm looking for is pretty easy to explain (hopefully easy to
implement also :p) Basically, this is what we have now:
auto_view image/tiff
This line tells mutt to consult $mailcap_path and find a mailcap entry
that
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-05-02 11:57] crowed:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:02:55AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Said John Buttery on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:24:49AM -0600:
gpg --verbose --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --recv-keys 587F0CD702368857
On 2002.03.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?!
He's set save_name, probably. I only have 2000 mboxes in mine, but Sven
probably sends mail more broadly than I do.
--
-D.[EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:37:17PM -0600, Knute wrote:
press return to continue It's a small price to pay to get my email
filtered for me :D
Ok! However, I suggest mutt developers to implement this feature! Maybe including
fetchmail support directly distribuited with the Mutt
Well, I already
Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is
as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments?
I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don't have
to mess with it.
--
Bob McLaren
Internet Services Project Manager
Financial
On 2002.03.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob McLaren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is
as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments?
I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don't have
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:17:46AM -0800, Bob McLaren wrote:
Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is
as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments?
I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don't have
to mess with it.
Hello mutt-users,
whenever I save a *read* message into an imap-folder the message is
marked as old (O). What can I do against this behaviour?
--
Cheers,
Heiko Heil (using Mutt 1.3.27i)
__
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail -
In response to both David and Ralf,
The original problem is that, when I use Mutt from the command line, it uses the
LOCAL smtp server to send emails. I need the client to connect to a REMOTE smtp
server, and as far as I understand from Simon, Mutt cannot be configured to connect
to a
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:29:48AM -0800, Bob McLaren wrote:
So now what I am looking for is a simple SMTP client that is as easy to use as
Mutt, or, some alternative means of getting Mutt to talk to my remote smtp server
ssmtp, or others
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road,
Cameron, et al --
...and then Cameron Simpson said...
%
% On 17:15 02 Mar 2002, christophe barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% | It seems there is no option to avoid the use of the access time.
...
%
% Instead, I have my procmail recipe write a line to a log file when
% interesting email arrives
Cameron, et al --
...and then Cameron Simpson said...
%
...
% have the folder open in one mutt at a time (which I suppose is desirable
% anyway - I enforce that in my wrapper script).
I've heard this before and I still haven't seen a reason to worry about
having multiple mutts open. Can
Josh --
...and then Josh Kuperman said...
%
% On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:00:12AM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote:
% I installed mutt on my MacOS X (using the fink package version) and it
% works fine except for the aliases. I tried different shells (tcsh is
% the default shell, bash is available
David,
% Instead, I have my procmail recipe write a line to a log file when
% interesting email arrives (i.e. only when one of a few recipes fires).
% And I have a small window which tails that logfile. If I were in text mode I
% could just tail that log in the background.
I like this,
But this isn't a problem with the SMTP headers having bad info. This is a
problem with the HELO SMTP handshake having bad info.
Mutt sends the message to my local sendmail, my local sendmail attempts to
send the mail, it connects to the destination mail server and begins the
conversation with
Bob McLaren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this isn't a problem with the SMTP headers having bad info. This is a
problem with the HELO SMTP handshake having bad info.
Mutt sends the message to my local sendmail, my local sendmail attempts to
send the mail, it connects to the destination mail
That solved it!
I didn't understand the 'SmartHost' concept in sendmail before you mentioned it.
I looked it up, configured it, now it works like a charm.
Thanks man! Now I can use Mutt to my heart's content. ;)
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Bob McLaren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this isn't a
On 15:39 05 Mar 2002, David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| ...and then Cameron Simpson said...
| % have the folder open in one mutt at a time (which I suppose is desirable
| % anyway - I enforce that in my wrapper script).
|
| I've heard this before and I still haven't seen a reason to worry
I like this, and I've been looking for something this simple Can you
post or send your config for me to blatantly copy? :-)
I use a modified version of a program called root-tail
(wwwvarcx/root-tail) to tail -f my procmail log, /var/log/secure, and a
few other files Each one is displayed in a
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-03-02 10:27 AM EST]:
Until yesterday, I used mutt installed from RedHat's RPM (1.2.5).
I have now switched to mutt-1.3.27i-1.1.rhl6
(linked from www.mutt.org) and ...
* David Collantes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020305 16:27]:
Please check the whole thread
Well, I switched to vi (vim, actually) as the For page a vi junkie,
this is really much better (And, for a person who doesn't really
understand how to use mutt right)
I though I would pass along some helpful points in case anyone else
wants to do this
To start vi, I use the following set pager
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020305 17:52]:
John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?!
He's set save_name, probably. I only have 2000 mboxes in mine,
but Sven probably sends mail more broadly than I do.
yup - i have set
Our IT group have just fixed the mail setup so that I can send mail to the
outside world...
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:05:16AM -0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We also have a local linux user's group and a mailing list.
A comment was made to the mailing list that mutt was handicapped.
hey all,
i was sending a message today and ran into a problem i was attaching a series of
files, and attached one that i later wanted to remove before sending i checked the
help, but couldn't seem to find a key-binding to do this i ended up just sending the
message w/ the unnecessary file and
On 15:37 05 Mar 2002, David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| % On 17:15 02 Mar 2002, christophe barb? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| % | It seems there is no option to avoid the use of the access time.
| ...
| % Instead, I have my procmail recipe write a line to a log file when
| % interesting email
Previously, Ryan Singer wrote:
%
% i was sending a message today and ran into a problem i was attaching a
% series of files, and attached one that i later wanted to remove before
% sending i checked the help, but couldn't seem to find a key-binding to
% do this i ended up just sending the
--IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! John Buttery spake thus:
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/setup.html
=20
What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?!=20
* Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020305 22:13]:
Well, I switched to vi (vim, actually) as the .
as the ??
For page a vi junkie, this is really much better. (And, for a
person who doesn't really understand how to use mutt right.)
;-)
I though I would pass along some helpful points
in
Heiko Heil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whenever I save a *read* message into an imap-folder the message is
marked as old (O). What can I do against this behaviour?
This is documented as a known bug in IMAP:
* Server copy currently doesn't take into account uncommitted
changes in
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020228 23:51]:
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/faq/maillist.html ;-)
Hmm, I should do a nice long rant on why laying out
stuff using tables, font tags, all the stupid style attributes
and not including doctype declorations is concidered harmful ;)
go
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020301 09:20]:
i love mutt, and wouldn't switch for the world, but i
don't think that it's the mail client for everyone.
i'd even be hesitant to recommend it to many of my
(fairly computer-literate as a rule) co-workers.
that's fine. dont give mutt to
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 03:45:45PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Josh --
...and then Josh Kuperman said...
%
% On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:00:12AM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote:
% I installed mutt on my MacOS X (using the fink package version) and it
Not to be persnickity, but did you put a colon
Hello All:
Earlier I posted an email to this list soliciting comments
about mutt. Many of those comments were used in an article that I wrote
in our webzine about ncurse/s-lang/command-line tools for linux.
The article(s) is/are at http://www.frozen-north-linuxonline.com/
under Tim's
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/05 20:42]:
I uploaded my key to certserver.pgp.com. I've also successfully
retrieved my key from this server. Is this one not in the rotation?
Is there some other server I should be using? I have successfully
retrieved (almost) everyone else's key
I am confused too, but:
My linux box uses sendmail with mutt I don't know how to configure mutt to
use another mail server!
It looks like your mail relay machine can't figure out who 1921681130 is,
which I assume is the machine sending the mail Do you have a static ip? Is
there a DNS which ought
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:13:27PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
map z z --- fast shift email to top of screen. First command given
after email comes up in vi. I wish I could get this to happen automatically.
Joel
Well, I'm pretty much a vi newbie myself but someone showed me a
command called
Hi,
Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared
to empty and removed by mutt.
I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them,
mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a feature?
best regards,
charlie
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:11:30PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote:
Hello All:
Earlier I posted an email to this list soliciting comments
about mutt. Many of those comments were used in an article that I wrote
in our webzine about ncurse/s-lang/command-line tools for linux.
The article(s) is/are
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:25:04PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared
to empty and removed by mutt.
I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them,
mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:25:04PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
Hi,
Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared
to empty and removed by mutt.
I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them,
mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a
66 matches
Mail list logo
