Re: Bottom posting v top posting

Am 14. Mai 2018 18:21:09 MESZ schrieb Ben Oliver : >This is a cool idea. I use K9 which has decent threading support. >Mainly >for reading rather than sending though. Could you send me a screenshot please? I also do use k9, but I only do see a grouping by subject. It lacks

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

El día martes, mayo 15, 2018 a las 08:35:50a. m. +0200, Martin Trautmann escribió: > > > Am 14. Mai 2018 18:21:09 MESZ schrieb Ben Oliver : > >This is a cool idea. I use K9 which has decent threading support. > >Mainly > >for reading rather than sending though. > > Could

Option to disable S/MIME signature check?

Hi, once in a while I get emails with S/MIME signatures. This is on public mailing lists, where I seldomly care about signatures, and I open the email only to read one or two lines to be sure I can actually press 'd' :~) Mutt says "Invoking S/MIME..." which takes too long for my taste (some

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On Di, Mai 15, 2018 at 01:37:06 +0100, tech-lists wrote: But inline quoting has its own issues. Multiple inline quotes from multiple messages can get messy. IMOHO messier than just bottom posting, which is at least logically chronological. Bottom posting is as bad as top posting. There isn’t

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On 18-05-15 14:57, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Bottom posting is as bad as top posting. There isn’t much difference. I fully agree. Using fullquotes it does not matter very much whether you do it at top or bottom. Both is stupid for replies and even worse on mailing lists where everyone should know

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On 18-05-15 14:37, tech-lists wrote: > On 13/05/2018 18:15, Martin Trautmann wrote: >> IBTD. Major e-mail tools, such as outlook, failed to support proper >> threading. Writing on a smartphone here, I'm not even aware of an app >> with threading. > > You're using K-9 mail which has apparently

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On 13/05/2018 18:15, Martin Trautmann wrote: IBTD. Major e-mail tools, such as outlook, failed to support proper threading. Writing on a smartphone here, I'm not even aware of an app with threading. You're using K-9 mail which has apparently supported threading since 4.390-beta, see

Re: Option to disable S/MIME signature check?

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:40:38AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Is there an option in mutt to do this? Hopefully a run time > option, not a compile time option... The compile-time configuration is the cleanest way to turn it off. However, you could try set smime_verify_command="" (along with

Re: Option to disable S/MIME signature check?

On 2018-05-15 09:06, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > However, you could try set smime_verify_command="" (along with > smime_verify_opaque_command and smime_decrypt_command). Thanks, but unfortunately, this did not help. I found that set crypt_use_gpgme=no helps however (source:

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:24:00AM +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:57:33AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote: > > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:52:23AM +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > > My partner reads gmail on her phone or tablet. She reads my messages but > > > does > > >

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 07:15:46PM +0200, Martin Trautmann wrote: > But are we still discussing bottom vs. top quoting? The here > recommended style to me is known as INLINE QUOTING, where you do > trim the quoting to the few lines which will help to understand the > context of a discussion.

Re: Option to disable S/MIME signature check?

Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:40:38AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >> Is there an option in mutt to do this? Hopefully a run time >> option, not a compile time option... > > The compile-time configuration is the cleanest way to turn it off. > However, you could try set

Re: choices on reading HTML emails

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:57:53PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone share some approaches for reading HTML emails. > Currenlty I use w3m: > > text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput; > > But sometimes I receive some HTML mails which can not be handled that well

Re: Option to disable S/MIME signature check?

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 03:27:15PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:40:38AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > >> Is there an option in mutt to do this? Hopefully a run time > >> option, not a compile time option... > > > > The compile-time