On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:43 PM, MVallevand wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Sharkey wrote:
>> Processor
>>* Intel® Atom™ 230 processor
>
> I think the verdict is still out on the 230 vs 330. In using the 230
> I find it slow.
s/verdict/jury/ ?
It's a tough call to make. I w
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:28:29PM -0400, Tom Metro wrote:
> > The benefit is making the project look actively maintained. If I were
> > looking to buy hardware for a myth frontend right now, I would look at
> > the mvpmc website and be nervous because there had been no releases in
> > 1.5 years.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Sharkey wrote:
> Processor
> * Intel® Atom™ 230 processor
I think the verdict is still out on the 230 vs 330. In using the 230
I find it slow.
> * 1GB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHz
The XBMC forums say 4GB is preferred over 2GB for playback so this
might be anoth
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
> This makes me more skeptical of the PCH, and think that the NVIDIA Ion
> platforms may hold more potential, if the underlying video decoding
> hardware ends up widely deployed among both appliances, nettops, and
> desktops, and thus supported by m
Eric Sharkey wrote:
> Mordechai T. Abzug wrote:
>> ...be nervous because there had been no releases in 1.5 years.
>
> You could say the same about MythTV itself.
True, the MythTV project is known for having infrequent releases, but it
has an established history of that, so unless you're referrin
