changing
> MLO’s action to be more nearly compliant. That’s because there are some
> users out there who are counting on the existing functionality. I have been
> stung several times (and the developers I’m sure have been stung even more)
> by proposing clear improvements in MLO function
ter question to ask is, how can MLO provide any tools you need but
don’t have that will let you build your dream view.
From: mylifeo...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:mylifeo...@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of John Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 8:59 PM
To: mylifeo...@googlegroups.c
gt; of angry protests from fans of the prior functionality.
>
>
>
> So the better question to ask is, how can MLO provide any tools you need
> but don’t have that will let you build your dream view.
>
>
>
> *From:* mylifeo...@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> mylife
I have discovered a rather fundamental "weirdness" of the system.
Depends on what is normal, though. To me it's a feature..I'll explain.
(though to be fair I haven't looked at the behavior at the toplevel. My
toplevel is static).
So it's almost as if MLO is treating a Folder as if it were a P
@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MLO] Quirk: "Next Action by Folder" happening in "Next Action by
Project" view.
Hi
[ASIDE: OK I am still smarting... but apologies are accepted where given. From
my side I am happy to apologise for my the tone of some of my earlier remarks.
OK l
Hi
[ASIDE: OK I am still smarting... but apologies are accepted where given.
>From my side I am happy to apologise for my the *tone* of some of my
earlier remarks. OK let's move on.]
I have discovered a rather fundamental "weirdness" of the system. [Fwiw, in
order to confirm this weirdness I
