I do really like this idea of being able to pay to vote for prioritization
of upcoming features, at least on a small scale. If each product vote cost
$1 (or some other nominal amount) it would quickly reveal how badly
customers want a feature, and possibly provide some degree of funding for
Hi Dwight,
Perfect!
Thank you.
Mário
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
I want MLO to be very successful and continue to roll out the new
features that I want, so I am willing to pay any reasonable amount. The
question of where in their landscape they build the tollbooth does not
matter much to me, the only issue is that it should be wherever
generates more
I have a iPhone 6s Plus, iPad Air, and Asus Android Tablet. There is
absolutely no decent task/project app I've seen that syncs across these
platformsnow made even better with push sync.
I think it is well worth it to pay for cloud service so that they can
continue to maintain it and continue
I agree with you James,
Everyone must choose the desired and sustainable business model that suites
their own business.
It was a suggestion, a desire, call it whatever you want.
But we can charge in different ways so that appealing more customers/users.
I think the review is a good way...not
+1 on charging for Cloud Service. I am also wishing to be able to pay to
vote for upcoming features
Zainan Victor Zhou, 周载南
650-336-5691
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:37 PM, James D wrote:
> From the perspective of an enthusiastic user of other "dead" PIM programs
> of the
>From the perspective of an enthusiastic user of other "dead" PIM programs
of the past, most notably Ecco Pro, a great outliner-based PIM program...
When I put my life and information and plans and schemes and goals into a
program like MLO, the last thing I want is for the company producing that