f nice hot
DDR333...these days, ram is cheap enough you can really load up a
machine and not hurt too much.
D
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Proffitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:46 PM
To: Mysql List
Subject: Re: RE: Platform vs. Performance
First, Thanks
First, Thanks for all replies, I'll be going with XP Pro on a P4 machine. The next
question is RAM, I know more is better, but the access database file I'm using now is
120Megs and will stay about the same size. Do I need more than 1G, can I get by with
512M Ram? I will of course turn virtual
you forget your sense
of reality...
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harald Fuchs
> Sent: 18 September 2003 17:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Platform vs. Performance
>
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> &q
Are these numbers still valid? Those documents are quite old - well
before the time of 4.0 being declared production ready and before the
inclusion of InnoDB tables. Since then, the Windows port has had a lot
of work done on it and many of the "TODO" sections at the bottom have
been taken care of.
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 September 2003 14:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Mysql List
> Subject: RE: Platform vs. Performance
>
>
>
>
>
> > I don't see anything in there that is relevant to the original
> I don't see anything in there that is relevant to the original posting.
The tables headed "Speed difference between different SQL servers (times in
seconds)"
The top row of each table shows times for the same operation on Linux and
Windows, showing that for both operations tested, Linux achi
I don't see anything in there that is relevant to the original posting.
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harald Fuchs
> Sent: 18 September 2003 14:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Platform vs. Performance
>
> > Pros? Cons? I know the windows box would need a good reboot now
> > and then and what is the performance hit on a WinTel 98/XP Pro
> > platform vs Linux? Looking at a 40K record database with maybe
> > 3 users at a time running 5-10 Large (length of the select
> > statment is over 500 chara
--Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Proffitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 September 2003 23:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Platform vs. Performance
>
>
> We are currently using an access database going through an odbc
> connection in vb.net for our applicati
We are currently using an access database going through an odbc connection in vb.net
for our application (which is still in development). The plan was to use MySQL in the
end and we are needing to cross that bridge.
I was wondering the Performance differences between running MySQL on a Linux bo
10 matches
Mail list logo
