Re: Storing negative numbers in AUTO_INCREMENT

2003-06-10 Thread Becoming Digital
ROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, 10 June, 2003 05:42 Subject: Re: Storing negative numbers in AUTO_INCREMENT >I hate to be the one to ask, but what's the subject have to do with the >rest of >the message? I can't see how the two are related at all. They are not

Re: Storing negative numbers in AUTO_INCREMENT

2003-06-10 Thread Egor Egorov
"rich johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Short question: I understand that MySQL in some circumstances > may decide that it's faster to do a full table scan rather than use > the index to look up values. > > But I miss some information on *when* this happens. Is there some > way, short of re

Re: Storing negative numbers in AUTO_INCREMENT

2003-06-10 Thread rich johnson
I hate to be the one to ask, but what's the subject have to do with the rest of the message? I can't see how the two are related at all. They are not :-( I started out using an old draft (which was never sent, because I figured it out in the meantime). Didn't want to blast away at the list once a

Re: Storing negative numbers in AUTO_INCREMENT

2003-06-10 Thread Becoming Digital
I hate to be the one to ask, but what's the subject have to do with the rest of the message? I can't see how the two are related at all. Edward Dudlik Becoming Digital www.becomingdigital.com - Original Message - From: "rich johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue