RE: mysql memory usage

2003-11-05 Thread Alexis Guia

Sorry, but I disagree :/
I always used 250MB of key buffer, and MySQL never allocates more than
50MB, in my database.
Read buffer is only allocated when full scans are done.
Join buffer is allocated when there are joins without index use.
Sort buffer is allocated when needed, and etc...


Alexis

P.S.: you can test it easily, doing specific queries for each case.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: terça-feira, 4 de Novembro de 2003 23:51
To: Alexis Guia
Cc: 'Benjamin KRIEF'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql memory usage

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:09:01AM -, Alexis Guia wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I think that MyISAM uses the key buffer only if needed. The same
happens
 with almost all the other buffers (read buffer, sort buffer, etc.). 

True, but there's a subtle difference between uses and allocates.
If you tell MySQL that it has 16GB for a key_buffer, it'll allocate
16GB even if it only ever uses 28KB.  The same is true of several
(probably all?) other buffers.

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 4.0.15-Yahoo-SMP: up 51 days, processed 1,925,645,484 queries
(428/sec. avg)


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mysql memory usage

2003-11-05 Thread Matt W
Hi,

In every instance I've seen, MySQL always allocates the amount you set
for key_buffer at server startup even if it never comes close to being
*used*. (It shouldn't be doing malloc()s or whatever for that on the
fly. :-)) Same thing for query_cache_size.

Now about join, read, and sort buffers, that's correct that they're only
allocated when doing those specific operations. BUT, the thing I'm not
clear on is whether the amount you have set is allocated all at once or
as needed up to the specified size. Of course, if the whole size is
needed, it would be faster to allocate it all at once. But if not.

Maybe I should ask on the Internals list sometime.


Matt


- Original Message -
From: Alexis Guia
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 5:30 AM
Subject: RE: mysql memory usage



Sorry, but I disagree :/
I always used 250MB of key buffer, and MySQL never allocates more than
50MB, in my database.
Read buffer is only allocated when full scans are done.
Join buffer is allocated when there are joins without index use.
Sort buffer is allocated when needed, and etc...


Alexis

P.S.: you can test it easily, doing specific queries for each case.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny
Sent: terça-feira, 4 de Novembro de 2003 23:51
To: Alexis Guia
Cc: 'Benjamin KRIEF'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql memory usage

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:09:01AM -, Alexis Guia wrote:

 Hi,

 I think that MyISAM uses the key buffer only if needed. The same
happens
 with almost all the other buffers (read buffer, sort buffer, etc.).

True, but there's a subtle difference between uses and allocates.
If you tell MySQL that it has 16GB for a key_buffer, it'll allocate
16GB even if it only ever uses 28KB.  The same is true of several
(probably all?) other buffers.

Jeremy


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mysql memory usage

2003-11-05 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:30:46AM -, Alexis Guia wrote:
 
 Sorry, but I disagree :/
 I always used 250MB of key buffer, and MySQL never allocates more than
 50MB, in my database.
 Read buffer is only allocated when full scans are done.
 Join buffer is allocated when there are joins without index use.
 Sort buffer is allocated when needed, and etc...

I'm confused.  Exactly which of my statements are you disagreeing
with?

Jeremy

 P.S.: you can test it easily, doing specific queries for each case.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: terça-feira, 4 de Novembro de 2003 23:51
 To: Alexis Guia
 Cc: 'Benjamin KRIEF'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: mysql memory usage
 
 On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:09:01AM -, Alexis Guia wrote:
  
  Hi,
  
  I think that MyISAM uses the key buffer only if needed. The same
 happens
  with almost all the other buffers (read buffer, sort buffer, etc.). 
 
 True, but there's a subtle difference between uses and allocates.
 If you tell MySQL that it has 16GB for a key_buffer, it'll allocate
 16GB even if it only ever uses 28KB.  The same is true of several
 (probably all?) other buffers.
 
 Jeremy
 -- 
 Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
 
 MySQL 4.0.15-Yahoo-SMP: up 51 days, processed 1,925,645,484 queries
 (428/sec. avg)
 
 
 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 4.0.15-Yahoo-SMP: up 53 days, processed 1,974,835,485 queries (430/sec. avg)

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mysql memory usage

2003-11-05 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:10:41PM -0600, Matt W wrote:
 Hi,
 
 In every instance I've seen, MySQL always allocates the amount you set
 for key_buffer at server startup even if it never comes close to being
 *used*. (It shouldn't be doing malloc()s or whatever for that on the
 fly. :-)) Same thing for query_cache_size.

Yes.

 Now about join, read, and sort buffers, that's correct that they're only
 allocated when doing those specific operations.

Yes, as documented in the fine manual.

 BUT, the thing I'm not clear on is whether the amount you have set
 is allocated all at once or as needed up to the specified size. Of
 course, if the whole size is needed, it would be faster to allocate
 it all at once. But if not.

I'm 95% sure it's allocated all at once.  But a quick scan of the
source would reveal the truth. :-)

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 4.0.15-Yahoo-SMP: up 53 days, processed 1,974,935,882 queries (430/sec. avg)

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: mysql memory usage

2003-11-04 Thread Alexis Guia

Hi,

I think that MyISAM uses the key buffer only if needed. The same happens
with almost all the other buffers (read buffer, sort buffer, etc.). 

;)
Alexis


-Original Message-
From: Benjamin KRIEF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: segunda-feira, 3 de Novembro de 2003 21:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mysql memory usage

hi everyone.

i'd like to know if mysql always uses all the key_buffer size it has
been
given in my.cnf

especially, on my server with :

set-variable= thread_stack=128K
set-variable= key_buffer=200M
set-variable= max_allowed_packet=1M
set-variable= table_cache=128
set-variable= sort_buffer=4M
set-variable= net_buffer_length=8K

top shows this :

21:39:49 up 134 days,  3:00,  1 user,  load average: 21.82, 24.32, 21.84
Tasks: 375 total,  20 running, 355 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  83.3% user,  16.7% system,   0.0% nice,   0.0% idle
Mem:901156k total,   823388k used,77768k free, 6360k buffers
Swap:  1951888k total, 3376k used,  1948512k free,   711876k cached

PID   USER   PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
18598 mysql  20   0 54524  53m 2300 R 10.0  6.1   1:35.66 mysqld
(329 lines like this one, except for the %CPU column)

obviously , my server (dual pIII 1Ghz) is a bit exhausted.

but my point is :

mysql is threaded, so i guess the whole mysql size is 54524
(swap+physical).
why doesn't mysql use the key_buffer size ?
mysqladmin variables show the good key_buffer_size value.
mytop says my key efficiency is 99.54%.

maybe it has something to do with the database files size?

bye.


*
Benjamin KRIEF * Directeur Technique *  IGUANE Studio
*



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mysql memory usage

2003-11-04 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:09:01AM -, Alexis Guia wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I think that MyISAM uses the key buffer only if needed. The same happens
 with almost all the other buffers (read buffer, sort buffer, etc.). 

True, but there's a subtle difference between uses and allocates.
If you tell MySQL that it has 16GB for a key_buffer, it'll allocate
16GB even if it only ever uses 28KB.  The same is true of several
(probably all?) other buffers.

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 4.0.15-Yahoo-SMP: up 51 days, processed 1,925,645,484 queries (428/sec. avg)

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mysql memory usage

2003-09-18 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:53:29PM -0400, Gabriel Ricard wrote:
 Is there any way to see what MySQL is storing in memory? Like, for 
 instance, what is stored in the query cache, or at least what tables 
 have data stored in the query cache, and how much they have stored?

Nothing other than what SHOW STATUS tells you.
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 4.0.15-Yahoo-SMP: up 4 days, processed 188,953,956 queries (445/sec. avg)

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MySQL memory usage

2003-03-07 Thread John Wards
On Friday 07 Mar 2003 3:28 pm, Rick Jansen wrote:
 On a P4-2.6Ghz, 1Gb mem server of ours, mysql keeps getting slower and
 slower because the database gets bigger and bigger.
 At the moment the database is 5.5Gb big, the biggest table being 1.1Gb.

What OS are you using?

 'top' shows that mysqld is using 264M of memory. So I presume the rest is
 used for disk caching. How do I know for sure that mysql is using the rest
 of the memory, or how do I get mysql to use it all?

That seems fine we are using about the same.

 Would an extra gig of memory help mysql, or linux, to be faster? Will MySQL
 put it's tables in the extra memory so it won't have to read from disk
 anymore?

We are running on a Gig of RAm with the smae size of DB so I doubt it.

 What I *really* need to know, is would our server get quicker from
 installing an extra 1Gb of ram, before we take the chance and purchase the
 expensive PC800-RIMMS.

If you could provide me with your MySQL version and your OS I can advise a bit 
more.

We had major problems with slow mysql up until a few days ago which we have 
now solved, depending on your set up I could help out.

Cheers
John Wards
SportNetwork.net

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php



Re: MySQL memory usage

2003-03-07 Thread Rick Jansen
At 15:36 7-3-03 +, John Wards wrote:

What OS are you using?
Linux 2.4.20.

 'top' shows that mysqld is using 264M of memory. So I presume the rest is
 used for disk caching. How do I know for sure that mysql is using the rest
 of the memory, or how do I get mysql to use it all?
That seems fine we are using about the same.

 Would an extra gig of memory help mysql, or linux, to be faster? Will MySQL
 put it's tables in the extra memory so it won't have to read from disk
 anymore?
We are running on a Gig of RAm with the smae size of DB so I doubt it.
But if we have 2Gb of memory, instead of 1Gb, Linux could use more memory 
to cache the disk, so it could store more queries in cache, rather than to 
get them from the disk again, right? The more memory Linux uses for 
buffering, the less it has to get from disk..


 What I *really* need to know, is would our server get quicker from
 installing an extra 1Gb of ram, before we take the chance and purchase the
 expensive PC800-RIMMS.
If you could provide me with your MySQL version and your OS I can advise a 
bit
more.
MySQL 3.23.55, Linux 2.4.20.


We had major problems with slow mysql up until a few days ago which we have
now solved, depending on your set up I could help out.
Cheers
John Wards
SportNetwork.net
-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
Systems Administrator
Rockingstone IT
-
Before posting, please check:
  http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
  http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php


Re: MySQL memory usage

2003-03-07 Thread John Wards
Hmmm I would say other than upgrading your hardware try upgrading to mySQL 4. 
and turn on query caching.

The difference it has made to our server is unbelivable!

We have found no problems with it so far.

John

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php