I'm new to linux, and over the past few weeks while trying to get a mythtv
box set up I've learned about mplayer and how it's in the PLF. Seems like
this community picks and chooses which controversial programs or plugins are
allowed to be used and discussed. Why is this?
From what I can
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:54:40AM -0500, Adam Prentice wrote:
I'm new to linux, and over the past few weeks while trying to get a mythtv
box set up I've learned about mplayer and how it's in the PLF. Seems like
this community picks and chooses which controversial programs or plugins are
Wow. So is MythTV going to roll back any features that the industry
thinks are illegal? No more fast-forwarding through commercials? What
about introducing DRM? Is Myth going to obey the 'Delete 6 Feet Under
after 2 weeks' flag HBO put in? The attitude about Torrentocracy has
really made me
Matt Grommes wrote:
Wow. So is MythTV going to roll back any features that the industry
thinks are illegal? No more fast-forwarding through commercials? What
about introducing DRM? Is Myth going to obey the 'Delete 6 Feet Under
after 2 weeks' flag HBO put in? The attitude about Torrentocracy
i don't know why all the hoopla, and to be honest i have not read every
message in this thread, but if the original developers don't want
anything to do with particular plugins at all, that is fine. as long as
the project is open source (and better yet the APIs for plug-ins
documented), the
Myth and would hate to see this technology made illegal by someone
with questionable political motives.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Adam Prentice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 4, 2005 07:23 AM
To: mythtv-users@mythtv.org
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Torrentocracy
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:44:49 +, Paul Woodward
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Isaac, especially in light of NYC artical and similar slurs, wants to
keep this project and associated records (such as this list) squeaky clean so
that noone ever has a cause to legislate against this kind of
Matt Grommes wrote:
By 'that plugin' do you mean discussion of Torrentocracy would not be
welcome even if it were an official plugin?
I find it strange for an open source project with a plugin
architecture would prohibit discussion of certain plugins. Of course
if it's just because it hasn't
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:02:46 -0700, Matt Grommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By 'that plugin' do you mean discussion of Torrentocracy would not be
welcome even if it were an official plugin?
It will never be an official plugin AFAIK.
___
mythtv-users
On Friday 04 February 2005 02:23 am, Adam Prentice wrote:
Why not? It's a question regarding the usage of MythTV. I've searched the
archives and realize some people think torrentocracy is for pirates (shiver
me timbers). But there are perfectly legal applications for the plugin.
Unofficial
I've been trying to get torrentocracy working on a mandrake 10.1 box to no
avail. By using urpmi to get mythtv, and editing the torrentocracy files to
point to the correct directories everything appears to install ok, however I
get the QText error. And yes, I subscribed to RSS feeds.
I was
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 04:39 pm, Adam Prentice wrote:
I've been trying to get torrentocracy working on a mandrake 10.1 box to no
avail. By using urpmi to get mythtv, and editing the torrentocracy files to
point to the correct directories everything appears to install ok, however
I get
12 matches
Mail list logo
