In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joel Jaeggli writes:
[snip]
Are things like this useful? Is audience too macho to be seen with their
peers discussing rfc 2317 reverse dns delegation?
joelja
\begin{rant}
If reverse dns delegation is covered I sure hope Comcast is invited
(they don't do it
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
sell you 100/24 vdsl2 for around 80euro a month.
100/10 over CAT5 ethernet (and also 100/100) is available here in Sweden
for around $35+tax in quite a lot of places. Weirdly enough it's more
commonly available in places where the real estate owner
On 3/13/07, Daniel Senie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do longer-range wireless technologies like WiMAX
potentially impact the equation?
If cell phone companies have not covered an area, what makes you
think WiMAX is a magic solution? How well does WiMAX work to cover
hilly, forested, rural
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:42:32AM +, Fergie wrote:
Perhaps, depending on the last-mile and the consumer/business
distinction, but up through the late 90's, all that was available
to consumers (at best) was ISDN in Bell Atlantic territory -- at
least in Northern Virginia. I left that
On 3/14/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current wireless technologies have no problem with the rural aspect, just
the hills and foliage. Get on a tall enough tower in a remote enough area,
you can have quite a range on your wireless coverage. I'm not sure of the
cost of a cell
I do admit that I haven't been keeping up on BPL technology lately, as
I am not in [and know only one person living in] an area where power
lines are the only cabled connection to the world. My point was more
that there are areas where it's simply impractical to put out many of
the
On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:02 AM, David Lesher wrote:
{re: BPL will bring competition...}
I am totally baffled by all the hype over BPL.
What is true is the utilities would wet their pants over having
same. Not for offering Internet access, but so they could read
every electric meter in
Broadband-over-powerlines, like its cousin ethernet-over-domestic
wiring, is one of those things that gets discovered every three years,
hyped, oohed and aahed over, then disappears. Reason: it's a solution
looking for a problem, for the reasons given above. Why not, rather
than try to kludge
http://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four222
4.2.2 is the allocation to ISPs section; therefore 4.2.2.2 would be a part
of that. It states under that multihomed section that if you can
demonstrate efficient usage of a /23, you can receive a /22 from ARIN.
--Mike
_
From:
Free WIFI is just a joke anyway. Most of the time when someone is referring
to wanting or providing free WIFI, they don't really know what they're
talking about. People like free and people dislike being tethered, thus all
of the buzz around free WIFI.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From:
I'd say the reason cable is more popular is because most DSL is ran by the
incumbent telcos and you can't get good anything from those guys. DSL is a
better technology, but the companies doing it suck.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
WiMAX is minimally different than most current wireless broadband equipment.
Its main selling point is higher scale, thus lower cost. Its improved RF
capabilities result in maybe 10 db.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alexander
If anyone has feedback on Arbinet please drop me a private email.
Nathan Stratton CTO, Voila IP Communications
nathan at robotics.net nathan at voilaip.com
http://www.robotics.net http://www.voilaip.com
Did you look at the info on http://postmaster.aol.com/ specifically the link
Would you like to apply for the AOL whitelist? A company I am working for
had some problems recently with mail to AOL being delayed and lost. We
filled out the whitelist paperwork and have not had a problem since.
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
perhaps not. but there is a real issue w/ the number
of businesses that operate from the home (according to
some numbers this is as high as 65% of all US business)
and the telcos still retain a mindset of business areas
and residential areas. It is not possible to
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:50:19AM -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
perhaps not. but there is a real issue w/ the number
of businesses that operate from the home (according to
some numbers this is as high as 65% of all US business)
and the telcos still retain a
A universal service charge could be applied to all bills, with the
funds going to subsidize rural areas.
This is already done in the U.S., to no discernible effect.
I dunno. My rural ILEC which is up to its armpits in USF money, sells
me a T1 for $190/mo plus tax. (Plus what their captive
The system I looked at had fiber along the high voltage lines anyway,
to get enough bandwidth to the neighborhood - i.e., fiber to the
neighborhood, plus equipment there to put the data onto the copper.
After that, each transformer requires a shunt. Therefore, each
transformer requires a
You are right. Video content tailored to every user is going to be the
next killer app.
Unfortunately, neither the telcos nor the cable companies quite get
this. They are stuck to their channels and everything is priced in
terms of channels.
As far as Bittorrent goes, if you ever wanted to get
On Mar 14, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Bora Akyol wrote:
Unfortunately, neither the telcos nor the cable companies quite get
this. They are stuck to their channels and everything is priced in
terms of channels.
To be fair, part of this onus is on the content developers themselves
- after all, it's
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:23:37AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ccs.uottawa.ca/connect/why-internet-slow.html
ironically, it took more than 2 minutes for this URL to fully render for me.
while waiting for it to pull in icons(?) or other stuff to decorate the page,
i was able to
The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its
40th meeting June 3-6, 2007, in Bellevue, Washington.
The meeting will be hosted by XKL.
NANOG conferences provide a forum for information exchange among
network operators, engineers, and researchers. Meetings are held
three
Greetings,
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist. What is the
generally accepted title?
Thanks in advance,
Todd Christell
SpringNet Network
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Todd Christell wrote:
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist. What is the
generally accepted title?
Not sure why your HR
NOC Technician? Support Technician? I have others that I was called
when I worked in a NOC but it probably wouldn't be proper for here...
-Mike
On 3/14/07, Todd Christell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
Not sure why your HR dept would even care :)
So they can look them up on a pay scale list and decide what they should be
paid. Had this problem at one place I was at where the pay scale list
thought a System Administrator or Network Administrator
I was called a nocling but I doubt that would pass the HR test.
Kim
- Original Message
From: Justin M. Streiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NANOG nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:07:52 PM
Subject: Re: NOC Personel Question (Possibly OT)
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Todd
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 22:07 -0400, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Todd Christell wrote:
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, K. Graham wrote:
I was called a nocling but I doubt that would pass the HR test.
There's also reboot monkey. :)
How about Network Support something ?
Gadi.
--
beepbeep it, i leave work, stop reading sec lists and im still hearing
gadi
- HD Moore to Gadi Evron
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Frank
Todd,
Maybe Im missing something here but I am not a believe in new
positions/salary just because you are going from a noc to a 24x7 noc.
Now, if you dont already have a noc and want to create the department
and also have it 24/7, I would simply leave have them as Network
Analyst. This would
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Simon Lyall wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
Not sure why your HR dept would even care :)
So they can look them up on a pay scale list and decide what they should be
paid.
In pretty much every place I've worked, the pay scale was set by the
Todd Christell wrote:
Greetings,
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist. What is the
generally accepted title?
Thanks in advance,
Todd Christell
On Mar 14, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
NOC (insert generic group name here)?
NOC NOC?
[Who's there?]
;
---
Roland Dobbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] // 408.527.6376 voice
Words that come from a machine
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
I heard from a few folks working for TelCove that they were under order to
do whatever it took to disconnect
NOC monkey
On 3/14/07, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, K. Graham wrote:
I was called a nocling but I doubt that would pass the HR test.
There's also reboot monkey. :)
How about Network Support something ?
Gadi.
--
beepbeep it, i leave work, stop
Could you please clarify that comment? USF has made it possible for us to
serve DSL to almost every customer in our exchanges.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 6:50 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: [funsec] Not so fast, broadband providers tell
On 3/14/07, david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard from a few folks working for TelCove that they were under order to
do whatever it took to disconnect customers under certian levels in my
local area (not philly).
Related? Dunno.
Level3 recently stiffed us on a colo contract
Todd Christell wrote:
Greetings,
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist. What is the
generally accepted title?
This is as best I recall a direct
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist.
We're 24x7 and we get by just fine without an HR department.
It has worked fine for 13 years, and will
On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
USF has made it possible for us to
serve DSL to almost every customer in our exchanges.
I'm glad to hear it - the reports of how that fund is (un)used are
almost overwhelmingly negative, I'm glad some folks, somewhere are
benefiting from
Jay Hennigan wrote:
This is as best I recall a direct quote. We don't care. You can
call yourself Supreme Imperial Grand Poo-Bah if you want as long as
our network stays up.
Nah, the proper term is Network Czar until you get into network
security, then you become the Network Nazi or the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
K. Graham wrote:
I was called a nocling but I doubt that would pass the HR test.
I'm kinda partial to NOC Knuklehead.
- --
=
bep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 15 00:52:53 2007
Subject: Re: NOC Personel Question (Possibly OT)
K. Graham wrote:
I was called a nocling but I doubt that would pass the HR test.
I'm kinda partial to NOC Knuklehead.
There's always Guru of Distributed Systems'. Reserved for the
44 matches
Mail list logo
