On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, David Hubbard wrote:
The thread yesterday didn't seem to get into much
detail; I'm wondering if anyone knows more about what
is going on with Verizon? Our PSTN service with XO
seems to be affected again by what XO claims is a
Verizon problem but they wouldn't elaborate
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Fergie wrote:
I'll bet you nickels to doughnuts that it won't make much
of a difference -- in the fact that too may end-ASs originate
specifics to attempt to engineer their traffic
We got hit by this a couple of months back. We had held out from doing
policy based
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Jeroen Massar wrote:
seems to be loads of people doing a lot of posting and reading, where else
would the volume of that traffic come from?
I guess experiences differ from different organisations, when I discovered
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Here's the story on the big outage.
http://marc.perkel.com/index.html
Here's another recorded conversation. (Can you do this in NJ?)
http://marc.perkel.com/audio/godaddy2.mp3
The GoDaddy folks are well trained. Kudos.
While I do
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Kim Onnel wrote:
Can any one please suggest to me any commercial or none solution to cap the
download stream traffic, our upstream will not recieve marked traffic from
us, so what can be done ?
Step 1: Please identify how
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Matt Hess wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback as to what people's experiences are (if
any) with image stream routers.. specifically the industrial ones.
http://www.imagestream.com/
Had a discussion with the manager of a large ISP in Turkey. He's a
transplanted
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
I'd be interested to know the relative pros and cons of switching packets in
software (Imagestream) versus handing them off to a dedicated ASIC (Cisco,
Juniper)
Probably a good question for Imagestream to answer, as I can't speak to
it. I'd
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:44:59AM -0400, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 8/17/2005 10:04 PM, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
A new law that's apparently the first in the nation threatens to
penalize Internet service providers that fail to
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Sounds like the standard notice that all reputable ISPs are probably
already giving. Given the very real potential for grandma and grandpa to
pick a number off a list which looks like it is in
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
I've been there -- I know how I feel about it -- but I'd love
to know how ISP operations folk feel about this.
Of course Bruce Schneider is going to allocate ISP's handling security so
he can sell them more of his crappy Counterpane
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Oh, please.
If you think that the Internet should remain an every man
for himself, wild wild west, Ok Corral, situation (not my
words, mind you), then you better get with the powers that
will steam-roll all of us if we let it -- money
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 8:13 AM -0400 2005-04-27, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
As for security, intelligent ISPs will be monitoring their network and
will have sensors in place to alert them to abnormal traffic (NetFlow,
Snort, SNMP Traps, Log watchers) patterns and take
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Brad Knowles wrote:
[Deleted]
What I really think we need here are some truth-in-advertising
laws which are applied to oversubscription rates. That'd solve the
problem really quick.
How about we regulat the Internet like the Electric Utility and charge per
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
[Deleted]
I agree with whomever said it earlier -- remember that the
global Internet is nothing more than a bunch of interconnected
private networks.
Yep.. And when you are dying of a heart attack in your house, and every
second counts,
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Intersting article on ISP issues regarding competitive
VoIP services:
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=lightreadingdoc_id=71020
Hmm.. I was quoted in it.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
That is fairly entertaining. Perhaps you could provide the financial
breakdown for ANY DSL business model that doesn't rely on
over-subscription?
Q. How many, full-on 6 Meg DSL subscribers can
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 3/30/2005 11:27 AM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Intersting article on ISP issues regarding competitive
VoIP services:
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=lightreadingdoc_id=71020
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Bill Nash wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Eric A. Hall wrote:
| to bear the additional cost of my customers choosing to use a
| competitor's VOIP service over my own, says Greg Boehnlein, who
| operates Cleveland, Ohio-based ISP N2Net.
|
| Without control
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 5:06 PM -0800 2005-03-30, Bill Nash wrote:
I find this to be entertaining, since as a VOIP consumer, I'm
reimbursing my ISP for the cost of the traffic as part of my monthly
tithe.
No, that's not true. Not if your ISP has oversold
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Ah, and therein lies the rub.
Any sort of QoS frob that is implemented for VoIP
(or any other traffic for that matter) _must_ be
truly honored end-to-end, and at every intermediate
hop in between, for it to be guaranteed -- otherwise
Anyone seen a rash of UDP port 80 packet floods lately? We found a huge
flood of packets from an address in Taiwan flooding into a customer's IP
on our LAN yesterday, which pushed traffic counts off the charts. Any idea
what might be at the heart of this?
--
Vice President of N2Net, a
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Gadi Evron wrote:
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/18/spam.lawsuit.ap/index.html
What a nice present for the holiday season :-)
-Hank
Indeed! If it will hold after the appeal.
Thing is, the spammers are not there to be found for
Hello,
This is my first post to the NANOG list, so please.. be gentle! ;)
I am looking at consolidating several different POPs in a specific city
that include a mixture of Point to Point and ATM T1 circuits. My goal is
to shut down all of the physical infrastructure in that city, cross
23 matches
Mail list logo
