-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lycos pulls anti-spam screensaver from site
At the moment the screensaver does nothing. It blanks to grey and
displays the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 9:06 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: How many backbones here are filtering the makelovenotspam
screensaver site?
I dont know how many
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How many backbones here are filtering the makelovenotspam
scr eensaver site?
on Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:55:02PM -0800, Chad
. Morrow wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Steven Champeon wrote:
on Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:56:29PM -0500, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Possibly. What will happen if the Lycos botnet gets hijacked?
The conversations between the clients and the servers
don't appear
to be keyed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 4:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How many backbones here are filtering the makelovenotspam
scr eensaver site?
on Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:15:34PM -0500, Hannigan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How many backbones here are filtering the makelovenotspam
scr eensaver site?
[SNIP]
As for go180.net, you don't show up much
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: is reverse dns required? (policy question)
I thought I saw some 'MUST' statements in an RFC
[*] From RFC 1912, section 2.1.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 9:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Make love, not spam
The BBC also has an article this morning about this:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Make love, not spam
Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Already noted as unbelievably stupid and dissected on Spam-L,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Make love, not spam
[ SNIP ]
The big difference between Lycos Europe, and a script kiddie with
zombies is that Lycos is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Make love, not spam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Hannigan, Martin
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Make love, not spam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:17 AM
To: Vince Hoffman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Opinions of recent ITU Comments on the Management of IP
Addresses
On 22-nov-04, at 21:16, Vince Hoffman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 12:41 PM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum; Jeroen Massar
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
Now I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Hannigan, Martin
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:34 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: RE: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
Some of them are questionable. :) There's some
useful information about this and the list here:
http://www.nanog.org/listfaq.html
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
Network Engineer IV
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 8:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Status of FCAPS model? Useful? Obsolete?
Someone at Forrester research wrote an article in 2003 that
said FCAPS was
an obsolete
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 12:14 AM
To: Daniel Senie
Cc: Randy Bush; kent crispin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
On 8 Nov 2004, at 22:53, Daniel
Almost all cable you will work with will have identifying
characteristics on the sheath i.e. what it is, who made it, and
what standard it conforms to.
That would be the better search criteria.
-M
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc.
Can someone from Sago please contact me regarding a problem
with a customer?
Thanks,
-M
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
Network Engineer IV Operations Infrastructure
[EMAIL
Thanks Joe, great post re the /48's, I was just about to.
We're working on this.
-M
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
Network Engineer IV Operations Infrastructure
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure but colo's dont operate on variances of power based on CPU.
They operate on committed power to cabinet i.e. 120W per cabinet
etc. and the ability to cool a fully loaded facility.
If you had a thousand CPU's use 1W more all at the same time it's
equal to about 9.5A. 1KX2W = 20A, 1KX3W=31A,
I can also load pages.
route-servertraceroute www.symantec.com
Translating www.symantec.com...domain server (12.129.192.148) [OK]
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to a568.d.akamai.net (208.254.57.157)
1 mdf1-bi8k-1-ve-93.lax1.attens.net (12.129.193.233) [AS 17233] 4 msec 0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
J. Oquendo
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 1:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: short Botnet list and Cashing in on DoS
I've been slowly compiling a list of known botnets should
anyone
Ross,
There are a lot of knowledgeable people on this list [tier 3].
Why can't you already tell if you aren't getting through to
major providers? Wouldn't your queues backup, or are you being
blocked and the messages are being rejected and you are trying
to track that?
-M
-Original
Folks, operational value is CALEA compliance. FYI. Note: Randy Bush has
generously contributed cycles to a list at PSG.COM to engage in
lawful intercept discussions (technical/psuedo-legal)
that are off-topic to NANOG.
If enough people indicate interest in a private followup, I'll
summarize
Already got mine and it went nice and smooth as far as I can tell.
Kudos to MS.
Has anyone noticed a real impact on the internet, traffic wise, related
to XP2? I'd suspect that some of the tier1's may see the traffic? Maybe
not?
-M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
than windows update
I would be surprised if it wasn't on akamai, which would cut down on
much of the external traffic.
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:01:24 -0400 , Hannigan, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Already got mine and it went nice and smooth as far as I can tell.
Kudos to MS.
Has anyone
SMS is ss7 based. You could buy a pair of combined linkset A links,
buy an SMS gateway and communicate with it.
Your best bet, IMHO, is dialing up and sending pages. There's a protocol..I
forget. It's been a long time.
-M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Actually, it has little to do with the techs day.
It's all provisioning. At the local mom and pop
CLEC, it actually may be the techs day. YMMV. :)
DSX indicates a cross connect in the loop.
A cross connect is a dumb mechanical device that does nothing
except put access points in the long haul
This appears to have been dealt with at the browser level
in MS Security Bulletin MS03-011.
I have a hard time blaming MS for everything since in most cases
of these things they do react. How do they force the users to update?
Could they implement a switch that says no update, no working
That depends on aisle spacing. A four post box has some dimension.
Depending upon the aisle spacing, it could obstruct an aisle or
obstruct access to other equipment. Midmounting works great in properly
sized aisles with defined working sides etc.
I hate it when I catch something on a box that
Just to be accurate, DS is digital service cross connect
i.e. dsx1 panel, dsx3 panel, etc. Typically a ds0 cross connect is
referred to as ds0 wire frame since it's muxed up to ds1's via
DSX1 bays.
A DSX panel is basically a piece of dumb equipment, sometimes fitted
with led port
Kind of summarizes why we are still heavy on the best effort side of the
equation.
-M
Regards,
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
http://www.verisign.com/
Why would the other side(new provider) violate ARIN policy and route the
space? The court order doesn't apply to ARIN, or the new
provider. I'd say it would be a violation of the agreement, but
I'm not a lawyer. Just a thought.
-M
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
At 02:36 PM 6/24/2004, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ben Browning wrote:
[ SNIP ]
this discussion anyways, is access to the internet. When the
actions of a
downstream damage that product(IE more and more networks
nullroute UUNet
traffic),
[ Operations
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Sean Donelan
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:25 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP
Cc: Steven M. Bellovin; Jim Dempsey (E-mail); North American Noise and
Off-topic Gripes
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds:
It's not just a funding bill. It provided $500MM for carrier network
upgrades and for switch software compliance. That fund has been exhausted
from what I have been told. It also clearly defined technical expectations
that carriers and manufacturers have to live up to.
All that being CALEA
Sean, the capacity requirements aren't as straightforward as you
are interpreting them.
If you are a CLEC and you cover a full five state
area in the Northeast, you probably are subject to a county aggregate
of a capacity requirement of 1500. You would then look at your
historicals, refer to
-Original Message-
From: Sean Donelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:39 PM
To: Hannigan, Martin
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Hannigan
Ok, but isn't this one of those things taken up better with google and
yahoo sales people?
Operationally, they have a large impact and they responded well.
If you only knew how many DDOS attacks your providers (all encompassed) see
and soak up, you'd be surprised.
YMMV
-M
Regards,
Actually, these problems are economical and business model problems.
Socio went out in 97/98. If not sooner.
Regards,
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
Check NANOG website for faq.
I think its in the faq, but if not, MRTG standalone has threshold alarms and
Cricket front end does too.
Ill check and if not add something in.
Regards,
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w)
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 3:16 PM
To: Hannigan, Martin
Subject: RE: ARIN awol?
No biggie... crank it out and make tomorrow night happy hour work.
6:30 McCormick and Schmitd.
/John
At 3:12 PM -0400 6/2/04, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
JC -- I can't make it again tonight
Isn't the regen seperate from the speed ie layer 1 and vs dwdm/lambda?
Regards,
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
http://www.verisign.com/
-Original
..and you can deploy SONET without a protect.
-M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stephen J. Wilcox
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spring time fiber cuts (was Re: fiber cut 19 May/PM - 20
May/AM) (fwd)
Charter, your abuse and security mailboxes are bouncing as unavailable.
Can someone from Charter security or network please respond privately
regarding
a host issue at your customer TAIS in Asheville, NC?
Thanks.
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign
That's NTPv4 isn't it?
I also prefer to use three peers vs. two. Always an odd number,
greater than 1. Assumptions can't be made about the mathematics
behind time, but in a reference model, odd numbers are better.
[Not to be confused with network timing, although the same clocks
are used
Thers also a Saturday night gathering at www.dnalounge.com
Mail me direct for info. Thanks.
Regards,
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
http://www.verisign.com/
I think Dan has multiple offers at this point. Dan, new addr? :)
Regards,
--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018
http://www.verisign.com/
-Original Message-
201 - 250 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
