Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I used to count the proportion of Mac laptops in the room (or, at least,
my row) to pass the time when I was bored.
I remember
at the 1999 Washington IETF I saw exactly one, and I
could hear people whisper about it around me.
I used to attend with various Power
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
On 7/22/07, *Sean Donelan* wrote:
DNS is just another application protocol that runs over IP. You don't
have to use those DNS servers to resolve names.
Possibly, you do (based on experience).
Agreed. If you're savvy enough to have a problem because of this,
Apparently, this has been in the news for a couple of days, but only just
hit my hometown paper
===
AT&T Inc. has started offering a broadband Internet service for $10 a month,
cheaper than any advertised plan. The DSL, or digital subscriber line, plan
introduced Saturday is part of the con
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, DNS should *reflect* reality, but I think it is very much
misguided to say that DNS should be the place to have canonical
information (i.e. source of all data). Canonical data is in
routing/forwarding tables on routers/switches. That's the operational
reality
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither 'show ip route' or 'have a text file' scale beyond a hundred
customers.
Hogwash. Used text file allocation for ~3,000 customers. After all, it
is *REQUIRED* to exist (for bind). You need *a* canonical place that is
authoritative for all others. Existing to
Drew Weaver wrote:
Does anyone have a recommendation of any software products either
commercial or freeware which will import the ip routing table from one of my
routers/switches and display it in a sorted manner? We just need an easier
distributed method than logging into our Black D
Sean Donelan wrote:
UK ISP associations have developed a centralized blocking solution with
IWF providing the decision making of what to filter. 90% of the UK
broadband users accept the same "voluntary" decisions about what to filter.
I have not seen any evidence presented that *any* "UK br
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Interestingly, nobody has mentioned on the list what the offending
content is yet. Or why this would even remotely be a good idea. I would
think that if the content in question is legal, ISPs and the government
shouldn't touch it, and if it isn't, law enforcement sh
David Lesher wrote:
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
You work so hard to defend people that exploit children? Interesting. We are
talking LEA here and not the latest in piracy law suits. The #1 request from a
LEA in my experience concerns child exploitation.
That
Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Follow the usual best practices, and you may save time and money.
1. Ensure that your DHCP, RADIUS, SMTP, and other logs are always,
ALWAYS, *ALWAYS* rolled over and deleted within 7 days without backup.
I'd recommend 3
Sean Donelan wrote:
The DOJ/FBI has been pretty consistent. They want it all and if there is
a technicality in the law that doesn't give it to them they have
consistently tried to expand the laws, regulations and court cases to
give it to them. ...
Very true!
But its also important to rem
Jared Mauch wrote:
You need to have a router or some appliances that will assist
you in the required lawful-intercept capabilities that are necessary.
But anything whatsoever is OK. Since you don't know of the capabilities
required in advance, there's no reason that it be a fast route
Heads up on operational problem!
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following r
Dennis Dayman wrote:
Ok, so the question of when is the best time to "spam" has come up. I cited
the ReturnPath 2004 study
(http://returnpath.biz/pdf/time_deliverability_0704.pdf), but now the
question of when we think the Net is most congested (more likely to see
overloaded MX servers and deliv
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:40:01PM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote:
Anyone else seeing issues with GBLX, DC area?
Yes. There appears to be a fibre cut of some kind either around
Virginia or Washington DC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] may be a better place
to discuss.
No, the best plac
Don't forget to CC all the traffic to NANOG list. Major outages have
always been an important part of NANOG list traffic going back to the
days when we were network techs, and are one main reason that I'm a
subscriber here. I have no intention of joining "yet another list"
for the same informat
J. Oquendo rambled incoherently, saying in relevant part:
William Allen Simpson wrote:
Especially as I'm not aware of any Network Operator worth their salt that
doesn't have regular contact with their support call centers.
Regular contact? As in finding the name of someone who actu
Gadi Evron wrote:
A compromise has now been suggested (by me). The only thing both sides
agree on is that in fact, the replies and flame wars on what is on topic
or isn't, and who should speak of what, are disruptive.
Agreed.
How about we, for now, only change one thing about NANOG - the sp
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
same location/facility doesn't mean that that place/people/thing still has
authority to route the PA block... Like say the decided to stop having
Cogent as a provider? or stopped payments to Cogent? or some other sort of
snafu...
According to the lead developer, br
BTW, the site(s) is/are still up, 5 days and counting
Now the original
http://oarwind.info/ct/
redirects to
http://oarwind.info/e/ct/
Christian Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
oarwind.info.
AS | IP | Registry | AS Name
6724| 81.169.143.178 | ripencc | STRATO Strato AG
How did you resolve this? Is there something wrong with
my DNS or did you make a mistake
Impressive response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the Postfix program at host bran.de.cw.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to
If you do so, please includ
P | AS Name
29119 | 84.232.124.32| SERVIHOSTING-AS ServiHosting N
PEER_AS | IP | AS Name
6739| 84.232.124.32| ONO-AS Cableuropa - ONO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====
William Allen Simpson wrote:
Allen Parker wrote:
Just my .02, emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (HA!
Allen Parker wrote:
Just my .02, emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (HA! like i'll get a
response!) and [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not expecting a response from
this one either) have been sent. Anybody else feel like telling these
folks that they've got spammers on their networks?
I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gregory Hicks wrote:
Just a "joe-job" though. The headers are forged. See the IP address
in thi FIRST "Received-by:" header. Came from Spain.
[...snip later headers...]
Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (unknown [84.232.124.32])
by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id AD0CF91265
it's hard to help much, as
the supporting documentation has not kept up with installation and
operations. A problem I'm sure we all recognize!
They are basically holding things together and bailing with both hands.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
t the same for the IETF, NANOG, or whomever else gets in the way.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
27;t got quick renumbering in my pocket. but i
do know that the IX's don't have it either. let's talk about this again
every ten years until one of us dies, OK?
Well, as it was 10 years from IPv4 to IPv6, it's been 12+ now, so maybe
it's time to design the successor to IPv6 ;-)
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
ly-
homed users will just renumber in a few days or weeks?
My experience hasn't been that sanguine.
Your other posts seemed to be more realistic. Let's keep the eye on
the operational ball.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
regulated. And we're not going to like it!
But that's another thread. This one is devoted to rapidly moving
singly-homed Level(3) customers without renumbering and without
destroying the routing table.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
s that matter" are not the
"vast majority of traffic"?
Or do you have some other insight on how to do massive moves quickly,
without renumbering and without damaging the routing tables?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> I remember presenting a paper at IETF over a decade ago about assigning
> IP addresses to exchanges instead of carriers.
Yes, that's been debunked many times over at this point. Still, it occurs
se
depends on Cogent's willingness to maintain their side of the traffic
exchange.
At which time Level(3) will have had time to purchase transit, as it
will be a "tier 2" hoisted on its own petard.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
William Allen Simpson wrote:
However, we should assist everybody without an AS and at least /24 to
move to Cogent without renumbering. That means the blocks should be
reassigned. That requires registry assistance.
To avoid routing table explosion, we probably need to identify adjacent
blocks
n AS and at least /24 to
move to Cogent without renumbering. That means the blocks should be
reassigned. That requires registry assistance.
To avoid routing table explosion, we probably need to identify adjacent
blocks and encourage them to move to Cogent, too.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Rather than speculation, it would be helpful to refer to the actual
contracts. Please post the relevant sections, Mr Wilcox.
the contract talks of on-net traffic, off-net traffic and excused outages
excused outages
s to have one with Cogent (and
mine is with Merit), but I don't have ready access to that one, either.
We'll need to see the contractual language before embarking on a
concerted effort.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Erik Haagsman wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 14:51 -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Arguably a very good thing. IXs shouldn't be in the "enforcement"
business. That's for governments.
Exactly the reason I don't want governments anywhere near an IX. Every
network
Niels Bakker wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Allen Simpson) [Thu 06 Oct 2005,
19:10 CEST]:
Following up on my own post, according to
http://www.ams-ix.net/connected/
Useful page, isn't it?
I wish that all IXs had one.
Cogent, Open
Level(3), Not public
We Dare B.V.,
William Allen Simpson wrote:
How do you expect to enforce your "member" regulations?
Again (to keep this on-topic), this partitioning is exactly what we
predicted. And I don't see your member regulations having any effect.
Following up on my own post, according to
http:/
Erik Haagsman wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 11:56 -0400, William Allen Simpson wrote:
This partitioning is exactly what we predicted in many meetings when
discussion the terms of the contracts.
Markets are inefficient for infrastructure and tend toward monopoly.
How does replacing non
Finally, some press taking notice:
http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=4531
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
pseudo-libertarians forget that all markets require
regulation and politics.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
http://lists.uprr.pr/mailman/listinfo/prix so we don't interrupt here :-)
good idea, too.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
For "contact us", I'm now getting a 403 error:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /feedback/ on this server.
Apache/1.3.33 Server at www.fema.gov Port 80
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
J. Oquendo wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Funny thing though, they don't seem to call their sites "spam-king",
but instead "opt-in-real-big", or the equivalent. So, we have to
examine their binaries to find the sites.
... And ho
.
then why did you use emotionally loaded words such as "terrorist?
and "porn", which is also clearly in the eye of the beholder ;-)
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
oliticians being
difficult doesn't mean the end of free speech forever.
Why not wait and see what happens?
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil
is for good men to do nothing." -- Edmund Burke
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
es -- none of which you'll
get back even should you win.
I've spent time in jail on principle. I'm glad to see others are still
willing to stand up and be counted!
For the rest of you, wouldn't it just be cheaper and more cost effective
to send some money to CDT?
--
William Allen
social life for
you desk jockeys.)
"The price of liberty is eternal vigilance." or vice versa.
"Conviction is worthless unless it is converted into conduct."
http://www.freedomkeys.com/vigil.htm
And make sure your companies are funding CDT.org, EFF.org, and EPIC.org!
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
this law takes effect in January, 2006, the time to begin moving
your company is Real Soon Now.
Unless you just happen to have FELONY bail bond sitting around cash on
hand -- typically $100,000 -- and plenty of funds for lawyers.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31
corporation will need to move it's
data and web presence out of state.
(4) Every ISP will have to make sure they have fewer than 7500
customers, because that's the level at which you can charge them for
the millions it's going to cost to defend your lawsuits.
Presumably, you
elf appointed moderator)
Somebody not observing the NANOG rules on pseudonymous posting.
Could a real moderator block this nitwit, please?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
s, and the legislature raised the fine
from $300 to $1,000 a few years ago, in a 3 am lame duck session just
before the Republican governor left and became the head lobbyist for the
National Association of Manufacturers.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
isqualified from serving in another postition for at least a year.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
hold:
Another analogy might be to describe Panix as a bank.
An analogy that is pretty far off, since the "bank" in this case would
be the REGISTRAR, not Panix.
And the registrar in this case is a victim as much as the domain holder.
Stop blaming the victim!
A personal responder wro
case, the peer being down means taking all their domains away
and revoking their registrar status and the performance bond.
Accountability. Responsibility.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
William Allen Simpson wrote:
Not that I've ever noticed. Are you actually a network operator
anywhere? Are you even _in_ North America? Your email isn't
To correct my own post, I saw Au, and assumed a shill for Mel-IT.
But it's Az, which is Arizona (still in North America
I couldn't have ripped it off the hinges
and gone in and raped her; it's the door company's fault.]
Stop blaming the victim! Stop blaming anybody else.
This was a Mel-IT error.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Mark Jeftovic wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, William Allen Simpson wrote:
(2) Registrants can't "lock" domains, it's a registrar-lock. Users
can only ask that domains be locked. Stupid policy, bad results.
under the new policy if the registrar
employs it they must p
(5) Mel-IT has an executive and a lawyer that were both notified about
the problem, and refused to mitigate the damage.
(6) Stop blaming the victim!
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
ship-based NANOG. Everybody who joins NANOG is on this
mailing list. Everybody who joins this mailing list is part of NANOG.
We (in NANOG) have an interest in ensuring that the bureaucrats assess
the penalty on behalf of our members -- that panix.com is made whole.
Accountability. Responsibility.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
r state.
Oh, I'd be willing to specify 1 and 2 hours, respectively, but doubt
the registry and registrars would -- 2 and 4 is conservative.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
trust can be associated, e.g., NeuStar, my former employeer,
and registry operators to who's operational art more trust can be
associated, e.g., SWITCH.
I'm sorry you felt that citing Martians was responsive to Bill's comments.
I don't think they were. I'm rather fond of Martians. Bogons too.
Eric
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
another 17353 seconds (4 hours 49+ minutes) before we'll see
it via Merit. But thanks.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
arly, this .com registry operator is not trustworthy.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
http://news.com.com/ISP+fights+for+return+of+hijacked+domain/2100-1025_3-5538227.html?tag=nefd.top
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
27;ve heard directly from the domain owner and operator,
but the TLD servers are still pointing to the hijacker.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
s opinion?
Maybe there needs to some sort of emergency reversion where at least the
nameservers can be rolled back immediately while the contesting parties
sort it out.
Might be interesting - what criteria would trigger the process?
Unauthorized change in the DNS asserted by any previo
n emergency anycast?
===
Alternatively, are people willing to block those name servers and/or
the entire blocks they are located in, to prevent the distribution of
the false panix.com addresses?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
ple of year ago: "Amazing, she knew what a CLEC was!"
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
ike my SBC/Ameritech neighborhood in Ann Arbor).
Sigh, not enough criminal instinct here.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
uter -- otherwise, it wouldn't work.
Plenty of experience. Has nothing to do with anycast.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
leak. But you're not fixing that
A redundant router should be where it would be doing some good -- on a
diverse link to another upstream.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
llSouth failures in the past, and
I've tested dropping each of my links from time to time to ensure that
routing works and I'm getting what I'm paying for....
Do you actually do any engineering, or just kibitzing?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
nd of the link bundle.
More than 1 router at any end will lead to a lot more problems than
anycast, including multicast and any stateful protocol (like TCP).
For one thing, the load balancing will be only in 1 direction, and will
lead to congestion in the reverse path Self defeating.
--
Willi
Png. It's been
another decade, past time for IPngng, although IPv6 sure hasn't had the
deployment success of IPv4, has it ;-)
Have we learned anything in 10+ years?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
w when things are
fixed there Even where it's really somebody else's job.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
et for network
guys. Whereas I cut and pasted the .com references for the zones from
their email addresses. Oops.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
4H IN A 147.28.0.39
_sip._tcp.psg.com. 4H IN SRV 0 0 5060 splat.psg.com.
_sip._udp.psg.com. 4H IN SRV 0 0 5060 splat.psg.com.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
"Stephen J. Wilcox" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> > I remain unenlightened. Should it be 2 days? Or 1 hour? And why the
> > inconsistent results? Obsolete root glue records?
>
> I think your first answer is from the
a.vix.com. 1H IN 2001:4f8:3:bb::1
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
I was reminded about rfc1537.
Been a long time since I read that, so a good reminder. But it only
deals with SOA records. And it's 11 years old (closer to 12).
The topic at hand was NS records. Any other guidance?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 2
.net.1D IN A 12.168.164.2
ns3.ispc.org. 15h29m10s IN A 12.168.164.102
ns3.watervalley.net.1H IN A 64.49.16.2
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
er, as they weren't accessible to us on-line yet.
Seems to me like a company of undergraduates without any real-time
systems experience. And a patent office of ignorant monkeys.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
to yet another partial renumber again next month as
we change one of our upstreams. Just another cost of keeping the
market competitive. :-( If nobody actually follows through on changing, there's no
incentive to offer competetive rates....
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint =
overnment could
install taps at telephone company switching stations to monitor phone
conversations that are temporarily "stored" in electronic routers
during transmission. "
[page 51-52]
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
no single, compelling, honest ethical standard like "the good
> housekeeping seal of approval" in our industry.
A consumers' union for the Internet? Didn't ISP/C have some activities
along this line, once upon a time?
Heck, whatever happened to ISP/C? The website doe
, and we had a tremendous increase in
spam allowed through the servers. It receded as soon as we installed
the BIND fix (as I've posted to the list at that time).
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
user.
I'm not sure this is the answer.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
good fit to your own business environment. There are usually
> several ways of getting them the data which they require to do their jobs.
>
Whatever they are willing to pay for -- a good fit for the business
environment is the largest effort and highest cost, as the overhead
and ad
e
that capability for the operationally challenged.
- have NANOG-approved OOO messages,
Folks running reasonable MTA/MUA don't have this problem, so why don't
you check the message headers to see what clueful folks are using,
rather than trolling the list? You can see all the message headers,
can't you?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
hines just keep running that program all day,
leading me to host on much slower W98 machines -- contrary to the usual
instructions. So, I can personally attest to "actually WORKS reliably."
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
had problems with
everything later.
Unfortunately, I cannot keep my relatives and customers from buying
new machines with XP, the worst thing I've seen yet.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
the display, flashes a big
warning screen, and asks whether it should continue. That causes the
startled niece to go running to momma to call uncle.
Whatever we use has to be flashier than dancing hamsters
Of course, anything that happens too often will just get the OK option
selecte
s 75 ms
12 69.60.142.242 (69.60.142.242) 73 ms 75 ms 73 ms
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
s (from not very old postings) that this fellow
didn't exist before August, and seems only to flame on isp-planet
(and now here).
As has been noted, his company is listed as a net hijacker and a spam
friendly carrier.
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
advance notice?
I wrote my first DNS implementation in 1987. I know it's still in use
on a number of old routers and dialup access boxen. My guess would be
another 16 years, or so, to clean up the entire mess.
Easier to eliminate the problem at the source!
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
e machine swapped out,
lather, rinse, repeat until all machines are finished.
(Since the VeriSign emergency went away, there was a lot less pressure
to divert support from the jobs they are paid to do, or work overtime.)
Really, no matter how you slice it, money is at least as important to
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
