> Even at an uber high charge (800/866 toll) of say $4.00 per call, they
> could still implement the changes save tons of money, and tons of
aspirin
> when their headaches go away. Maybe someone here can draft up a
> $10,000,000.00 pitch it to them become an instant millionaire and save
> Comcast
Or why don't they just create the $0 flash video or html step by step
instructions? Why doesn't the dummy series create "Comcast for
dummies", as they have for AOL users.
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:45:30 -0500, D. Campbell MacInnes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >
> > > "reconfigure their m
On 12/06/04, "Blake L. Smith - XtremeBandwidth.com, Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Since Comcast allows spamming (doesn't do anything to stop it) people
> should start spamming the phones at the help desk and let them know
> about the spam on their network. Although - two wrongs don't make
>
> > "reconfigure their mail programs to point at Comcast's servers, and
> > each phone call to the help desk costs $9."
>
>
> And they couldn't spend say:
>
> $1.00 per CD with a vb script or instructions on doing this
>
> $100.00 (far fetched price) to have an interactive
> step-by-step
> "reconfigure their mail programs to point at Comcast's
> servers, and each phone call to the help desk costs $9."
And they couldn't spend say:
$1.00 per CD with a vb script or instructions on doing this
$100.00 (far fetched price) to have an interactive step-by-step flash
video created to s
400 Office
949-606-7100 Fax
www.XtremeBandwidth.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rich Kulawiec
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unflattering comments about ISPs and DDOS
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at
> > "Based on my conversations last week, Comcast's network engineers
> > would like to be more aggressive. But the marketing department
> > shot down a ban on port 25 because of its circa $58 million price ...
>
> Thats quite ok, if theyre unwilling to filter port 25 on their end, we
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> "Based on my conversations last week, Comcast's network engineers
> would like to be more aggressive. But the marketing department
> shot down a ban on port 25 because of its circa $58 million price
> tag--so high partially because
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:56:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And if enough people clean up the bots on their network,
> then a case can be made for depeering (or severely damping)
> networks that don't clean up their act.
Agreed.
But few, if any, will "clean up their act". For instance,
This article in ZDNET UK entitled "WIth ISPs like this, who needs
enemies?"
http://comment.zdnet.co.uk/andrewdonoghue/0,39027004,39175983,00.htm
contains some rather unflattering comments about ISPs who don't help
customers deal with DDOS attacks. The head of security technology
for a major ISP
10 matches
Mail list logo