On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:07:47 +0800, Owen DeLong said:
Interesting way of thinking about it. I suspect that rather than pay your
premium prices, the customers you just degraded in order to charge
them more for the service they had will look to your competitors for
better service.
I suspect
On (2010-03-07 08:41 +1100), Mark Andrews wrote:
Not implementing IPv6 will start to lose them business soon as they
won't be able to reach IPv6 only sites. Not quite yet but soon. While
all the services that there customers want to reach are available over
IPv4 they will be fine. Once
On (2010-03-07 14:21 +0800), Owen DeLong wrote:
While it is more complete than many other countries, there are still rural
areas where it is not, and, the relatively high churn rate in competitive
markets will actually still lead to a need for increasing address allocations
and assignments as
-Original Message-
From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:msoko...@ivan.harhan.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 2:35 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SDSL vs T1 (was Locations with no good Internet)
Roy r.engehau...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed an option. Just change to another
* Thomas Magill:
1.Why don't providers use /31 addresses for P2P links? This
works fine per rfc 3021 but nobody seems to believe it or use it. Are
there any major manufacturers out there that do not support it?
Not all vendors support it, especially not over Ethernet.
2.
On 06/03/2010 21:32, Shon Elliott wrote:
I would love to move to IPv6. However, the IPv6 addressing, I have to say, is
really tough to remember and understand for most people.
Roll out DNS before you roll out v6 then.
basically, you need technical knowledge to even understand how the IP
Pardon the interruption regarding this somewhat unusual request, but
please forward this to your sponsoring/donations/legal/lobbying
department:
--
Dear Internet Industry representatives:
The Pirate Party Netherlands (
On Mar 7, 2010, at 1:47 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2010-03-07 14:21 +0800), Owen DeLong wrote:
While it is more complete than many other countries, there are still rural
areas where it is not, and, the relatively high churn rate in competitive
markets will actually still lead to a need for
On 07/03/2010, at 4:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I expect that once we all work out that we can use SP-NAT to turn dynamic
IPv4 addresses into shared dynamic IPv4 addresses, we'll have enough
spare IPv4 addresses for much of the foreseeable future.
Ew... The more I hear people say this,
9 matches
Mail list logo
