I have several queries in regards to ipv6
different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
given /48 from assigned global /32.
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
Is there any newbie guide for ipv6 subnetting?
Regards,
Shake
different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
given /48 from assigned global /32.
That should be that ISPs are given a global /32 from which they
assign /48s to clients. The client would assign a /64 to each LAN segment.
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Dillon
wavetos...@googlemail.comwrote:
different documentation state that clients be given /64 with ISP's beign
given /48 from assigned global /32.
That should be that ISPs are given a global /32 from which they
assign /48s to clients. The
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-01
On 04/06/10 09:20, shake righa wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
There was a recent thread here on this topic, see
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg04500.html
Lorand Jakab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps ipv3.com == Guillaume
FORTAINE?
It's spewing semi-coherent proposals for unworkable alternative addressing
schemes. Sounds more like Jim Fleming to me. Perhaps we start comparing IPv3
to IPv8 and see if we get a reaction? ;)
Regards,
Tim.
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:57:41 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet
hello
does anyone have a working configuration regarding cisco sending snmp
traps on tcn ?
i mean the actual info that i am seeing in the sh span vlan xx detail
which is like this:
Number of topology changes 15 last change occurred 00:22:27 ago
from GigabitEthernet0/32
i have
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/90747-fcc-dealt-major-blow-in-net-neutrality-ruling-favoring-comcast
Seems on-topic, even though policy related.
--
TTFN,
patrick
This seems relevant.
Decided April 6, 2010
Because the Commission has failed to tie its assertion of ancillary
authority over Comcast's Internet service to any statutorily mandated
responsibility, Am. Library, 406 F.3d at 692, we grant the petition
for review and vacate the Order.
So
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following Internet draft:
Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com writes:
also, see previous 12 episodes of this conversation.. 1 /8 == ~3months
in ARIN allocation timeframes.
1 /8 at global IANA free pool runout time (which is the only
reasonable way to think about it...) will buy us about 24 days on a
global
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:01:47PM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com writes:
also, see previous 12 episodes of this conversation.. 1 /8 == ~3months
in ARIN allocation timeframes.
1 /8 at global IANA free pool runout time (which is the only
Nick Hilliard wrote:
PHP stinks on the command line and text processing
This is a bit of a broad sweeping statement! Can you elaborate on what
your definition of how PHP stinks in this context?
We have dozens of CLI scripts all written in PHP, some of which have
been running for years and
-Original Message-
From: Tim Franklin [mailto:t...@pelican.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:09 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: As the NANOG Community Moves to IPv6...
P.S. Does anyone else think that perhaps ipv3.com == Guillaume
FORTAINE?
It's spewing semi-coherent
Max Gribov wrote:
On 04/06/2010 01:17 PM, Marty Anstey wrote:
Nick Hilliard wrote:
PHP stinks on the command line and text processing
This is a bit of a broad sweeping statement! Can you elaborate on what
your definition of how PHP stinks in this context?
well, try to
On 04/06/2010 11:05 AM, Marty Anstey wrote:
that said, php is awesome otherwise, been using it for last 2 years
strictly in 'enterprise' deployment..
id just say perl is faster and more efficient for batch scripts.
I can't speak specifically to the performance differences for comparible
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/90747-fcc-dealt-major-blow-in-net-neutrality-ruling-favoring-comcast
Seems on-topic, even though policy related.
Between that and the ACTA foolishness .. seems to be a good time to get
into the VPN business.
/rant
Michael Holstein
These standards do drag on don't they. I'd suggest that customers need to
come along and crack the whip a bit to help keep us grounded and moving.good
excuse to travel somewhere warm ;) On the 802.1aq comment, we are doing
MIBs/cleanup now so it should be out by end of this year so its probably
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Until you buy 25 cards with the same MAC address and deploy them all across
your enterprise
I don't think that's possible given that Jon was suggesting.
Given what I was suggesting, no...but there have been multiple cases of a
vendor screwing
Marty Anstey marty.ans...@sunwave.net writes:
Max Gribov wrote:
On 04/06/2010 01:17 PM, Marty Anstey wrote:
Nick Hilliard wrote:
PHP stinks on the command line and text processing
This is a bit of a broad sweeping statement! Can you elaborate on what
your definition of how PHP stinks
Anyone from eu.level3.net who can respond to an e-mail (inbound)
misconfiguration?
--
Henry Yen Aegis Information Systems, Inc.
Senior Systems Programmer Hicksville, New York
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:54:17 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
The best advice is to use a /64 unless you have read and understood
RFC 3627 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627
RFC 3627 *and* the following
When do you think that 1/8, 2/8 and 50/8 will start showing up as live,
assigned addresses.
I don't see any of them coming in on my core routers yet.
- Original Message -
From: Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org
To: Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, April 05,
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:20:26 -0400, shake righa ssri...@gmail.com wrote:
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
your IPv4 network(s)?
(Yes, I've used /31's before, but only to represent 2 /32's.
On 05 Apr 2010 12:43, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:29:20 EDT, Jay Nakamura said:
I would have attributed the success of Ethernet to price!
You've got the causality wrong -- it wasn't cheap, way back when.
I remember back in '93~94ish (I think) you
On 4/6/2010 10:39 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 05 Apr 2010 12:43, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:29:20 EDT, Jay Nakamura said:
I would have attributed the success of Ethernet to price!
You've got the causality wrong -- it wasn't cheap, way back when.
I remember back
Greetings!
Want to ask out anybody on the list about a best practice of the
setup below:
- 2 ISP's (A B)
- 2 Routers (A B)
I want Router-A for ISP-A, Router-B for ISP-B and have Router-A
Router-B talk and be able to pass routes on each side in an event of a
physical failure on one of the
There are alot more questions that need to be asked. Like how much address
space do you have to announce? What routes are you getting from each ISP?
Assuming you are an end user, and knowing the very limited information I know
at this point, I would make sure that these two routers LAN
Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links in
your IPv4 network(s)?
of course
randy
thanks for the reply brian. :)
sorry for a bit lack on the info, I was thinking of using VRRP. but my
2 links are running on different interface-types isp1 runs via
ethernet while the other is on an ATM interface. I only have 1 router
that has an ATM interface. setting it to VRRP would cause me
31 matches
Mail list logo
