On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 19:08, Dan Wing dw...@cisco.com wrote:
Its title, filename, abstract, and introduction all say the problems
are specific to NAT444. Which is untrue.
I just re-read the filename, abstract and introduction, and
Hope this helps
http://packetlife.net/captures/category/routing-protocols/
Regards
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:58 -0800, Javier Godinez wrote:
Deal NANOG,
Does anyone know where I can get real/raw BGP traffic, maybe in pcap
format? I just need maybe a few days of raw data for an inline
[ arin cesspool removed from cc: as i can not post there anyway ]
There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that
IPv6 is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this
position seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in
operating production
On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 19:08, Dan Wing dw...@cisco.com wrote:
Its title, filename, abstract, and introduction all say the problems
are specific to NAT444. Which is untrue.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Grundemann [mailto:cgrundem...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 8:17 PM
To: Dan Wing
Cc: Owen DeLong; Benson Schliesser; NANOG list; ARIN-PPML List
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
naysayer...)
On Mon,
We are recieving full routes from both providers.
---Chris
On Feb 21, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Charles Gucker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Chris Wallace
li...@iamchriswallace.com wrote:
This isn't the first time we have seen this issue with our various
providers, how can I prevent
As Max stated, you can set triggers based on thresholds that are monitered
via multiple methods in Cisco IOS. That way you could force the route down
dynamically. There's always a risk when letting the machines do the thinking
but this would help in situations like this. Can't speak for other
APEWS is braindead in execution, if not in fact. They list about half
of all IPv4 space, and one might reasonably state that anyone using
them
deserves their own self-inflicted SMTP intranet.
http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/08/apews-news-and-commentary-roundup.html
Andrew
The link Andrew sent
On 02/22/2011 12:23 PM, Hammer wrote:
As Max stated, you can set triggers based on thresholds that are monitered
via multiple methods in Cisco IOS. That way you could force the route down
dynamically. There's always a risk when letting the machines do the thinking
but this would help in
I'm not argueing that at all. But it wasn't relevent to the question at
hand. And depending on the scale of your business dumping providers is not
something done on a whim. It's not like your fed up with DSL and want to
convert to Cable.
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd.
-Jack Herer
Assuming that he has provider independent space (why run full BGP feeds if you
are not multihomed?), then, actually it's about on par and less disruptive in
general. Add new provider, wait a day or two, then disconnect old provider.
If he's using provider assigned space, then, the big hurdle is
Is there a process to revoke netblocks from entities which deny ownership?
http://www.db.ripe.net/whois?searchtext=77.223.129.43
The admin-c, tech-c deny any responsibility for this netblock.
-Dan
On Feb 22, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Hammer wrote:
I agree. But swapping providers is not the default answer in some
environments. I work in an enterprise with multiple GE circuits from multiple
providers to the Internet. The lead time on calling up a different carrier
and saying I need a
On 22 feb 2011, at 20:44, goe...@anime.net wrote:
The admin-c, tech-c deny any responsibility for this netblock.
Have you talked to RIPE?
I'm looking for cheap/slow internet connectivity options in Kabul,
Jalalabad, and Herat. The connections will be used by AFCECO
orphanages, so speed isn't as much of an issue as cost. I'm guessing
that satellite might be the only game in town, but if any of you fine
folks know of
Uncle!
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd.
-Jack Herer
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Feb 22, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Hammer wrote:
I agree. But swapping providers is not the default answer in some
environments. I work in an enterprise with
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Janet Sullivan netg...@bgp4.net wrote:
I'm looking for cheap/slow internet connectivity options in Kabul,
Jalalabad, and Herat. The connections will be used by AFCECO orphanages, so
speed isn't as much of an issue as cost. I'm guessing that satellite might
be
On Feb 22, 2011, at 3:14 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that
IPv6 is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this
position seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in
operating production networks.
excuse me!
I was wondering if anyone has a howto floating around on the
step by step setup of having an internal bgp peer for sending
quick updates to border routers to null route sources of
undesirable traffic? I've seen it discussed on nanog from
time to time, typically suggesting using Zebra, but could
On 2011-02-22 22:42, David Hubbard wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has a howto floating around on the
step by step setup of having an internal bgp peer for sending
quick updates to border routers to null route sources of
undesirable traffic? I've seen it discussed on nanog from
time to time,
Maybe I read your question wrong, but null-routing things at your border is
often not very useful if the traffic is flooding your transit links. Most
transits publish their community lists - you just need to tag the prefix you
want to blackhole with the right community.
See example from HE:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:29:23 CST, Benson Schliesser said:
There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that IPv6
is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this position
seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in operating
production networks.
most
Also:
http://docs.as701.net/tmp/CustomerBlackhole.txt
Remember to set eBGP multihop on sessions for the next-hop rewrite capability :)
- Jared
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2011-02-22 22:42, David Hubbard wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has a howto floating around
2011/2/22 Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net:
Also:
http://docs.as701.net/tmp/CustomerBlackhole.txt
Remember to set eBGP multihop on sessions for the next-hop rewrite capability
:)
oh hey, I was looking for that! :) (I'll try to re-setup the
www.secsup.org links tonight) ... this is a 'how
On Feb 22, 2011, at 3:54 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:29:23 CST, Benson Schliesser said:
There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that IPv6
is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this position
seems to be most pronounced
I've used them as well and they have been pretty good with gear that's common
place. Just be careful if you get off the beaten path and are using gear like
an IAD-2431-16FXS. They can help you with the hardware side on that kind of
stuff but not so much with the software.
Richey
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
Seriously, some people will not move until the path they are on is already
burning, which is why they did nothing over the last 5 years despite knowing
that the IANA pool was exhausting much faster than they had wanted to
believe. It took getting
On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:42 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
I've seen it discussed on nanog from time to time, typically suggesting using
Zebra, but could not search up a link on a step by step.
https://files.me.com/roland.dobbins/dweagy
Does anyone have some detailed information about the internet issues going
on in Sweden and other parts of Europe right now? I've read some reports
about a large Telia outage in Sweden indicating a fault somewhere
in Frankfurt or London as the cause.
On 02/23/2011 12:59 AM, Ryan Gelobter wrote:
Does anyone have some detailed information about the internet issues
going on in Sweden and other parts of Europe right now? I've read
some reports about a large Telia outage in Sweden indicating a fault
somewhere in Frankfurt or London as the
on 23.02.2011 00:59 Ryan Gelobter wrote:
Does anyone have some detailed information about the internet issues
going on in Sweden and other parts of Europe right now? I've read
some reports about a large Telia outage in Sweden indicating a fault
somewhere in Frankfurt or London as the cause.
Confirmed here.
It's solved with a temporary solution. The ticket is still open with in Telia.
--
Raphaël Maunier
NEO TELECOMS
CTO / Responsable Ingénierie
AS8218
On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Arnold Nipper wrote:
on 23.02.2011 00:59 Ryan Gelobter wrote:
Does anyone have some detailed
There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that
IPv6 is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this
position seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in
operating production networks.
excuse me!
Hi, Randy. I didn't mean to deny you exist;
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, David Hubbard wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has a howto floating around on the
step by step setup of having an internal bgp peer for sending
quick updates to border routers to null route sources of
undesirable traffic? I've seen it discussed on nanog from
time to time,
On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that
IPv6 is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this
position seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in
operating production networks.
excuse me!
Anyone know who to contact for issues with atdn.net? Their website is not
exactly a well of information.
All connections from my network to anything at atdn (AOL, etc.) are dying at
atdn's edge.
Traceroutes go out through xo.net. I have verified that both of my upstream
providers can get
On 2/22/2011 11:39 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
Anyone know who to contact for issues with atdn.net? Their website is not
exactly a well of information.
All connections from my network to anything at atdn (AOL, etc.) are dying at
atdn's edge.
Traceroutes go out through xo.net. I have
The other CERT: Community Emergency Response Team. Kind of off-topic
for NANOG but I know that most of us are concerned with disaster
recovery. This is the first local line. For US folks, there should
be a CERT for you city or county, if not ask why. For Canadians,
check with PEP. The CERT
38 matches
Mail list logo
