On 05/31/2011 05:31 PM, Voll, Toivo wrote:
Going to http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ipv6/ and hitting Start IPv6 Test I
get:
Your system will continue to work for you on World IPv6 day. However, we found that
your server only supports IPv4 at this time. You'll simply continue to use IPv4 to
On 31 May 2011, at 22:31, Voll, Toivo wrote:
Netalyzr (http://n3.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/analysis) finds no issues with
my IPv6 status, but alerts me to the fact (since confirmed by switching to
IE) that Google Chrome defaults to IPv4 rather than IPv6, and consequently a
lot of the
On 2011-Jun-01 13:18, Tim Chown wrote:
On 31 May 2011, at 22:31, Voll, Toivo wrote:
Netalyzr (http://n3.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/analysis) finds no
issues with my IPv6 status, but alerts me to the fact (since
confirmed by switching to IE) that Google Chrome defaults to IPv4
rather
Disable the firewall and try again or all results are worthless.
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:54:28 EDT, Atticus said:
Disable the firewall and try again or all results are worthless.
On the other hand, if you have a firewall you need to disable in order
for it to get valid IPv6 results, you don't actually have a working IPv6
configuration, do you?
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:44 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network
Sounds like a catch-22 though; if it's not always on and only starts
scrubbing after an attack begins
Hello all, really hate posting these messages here, but some of you are
tops are pinpointing a direct point of contact. I need to get a hold of
someone in Philips Corp. as about 12 different managed networks of ours
have been probed from one of their netblocks.
--
On 2011-Jun-01 18:36, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:54:28 EDT, Atticus said:
Disable the firewall and try again or all results are worthless.
That is quite what I noted, the thing is that apparently the delay for
clicking 'ok' is taken into account for the measurements
Folks,
I've just published two new IETF Internet-Drafts, that document the
problem of RA-Guard evasion, and propose mitigations.
They are two Internet-Drafts:
* IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard (RA-Guard) Evasion, available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion-00.txt
*
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:14:43 +0200, Jeroen Massar said:
On 2011-Jun-01 18:36, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On the other hand, if you have a firewall you need to disable in order
for it to get valid IPv6 results, you don't actually have a working IPv6
configuration, do you?
The
Specifically someone with admin rights over the router at
2001:1498:1:200::100:5d (got Telefonica from WHOIS as there is no DNS
reverse).
Can you pls contact me off-list ?
Thanks!
Carlos
--
--
=
Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
http://www.labs.lacnic.net
11 matches
Mail list logo
