Checked your MTU settings?
-Original Message-
From: jacob miller [mailto:mmzi...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, 19 September 2011 1:49 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: SDH Fiber Problem
Hi ,
Dont know if this is the correct forum to ask this however I have been having
the following problem
I disagree. I think that the underlying physical topology of your network is
something
ARIN is quite intentionally agnostic about.
Owen
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I understand that tunneling meets the letter of the ARIN policy, but I'll
make the bold assumption that
I can ping on point to point
I have BGP up and running
When I try to pass traffic over the link my clients are unable to pass
any meanigful traffic asn browsing is impossible.
mtu? try various size pings.
filters?
randy
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:57 AM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
However, your statement that I only welcome change funneled through
ARIN-managed channels is incorrect, as I have made it quite plain
on multiple occasions that the structure of the Internet number
registry system itself is not
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
On 09/18/2011 08:25 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I understand that tunneling meets the letter of the ARIN policy, but I'll
make the bold assumption that wasn't the spirit of the policy when it was
written. Maybe the policy needs to be amended
I have tried the pings and am able to ping through with a size of 1600 with the
df-bit set
without the df-bit am able to get up to 9000.
The switched on bot ends hav been set to allow jumbo frames through and the
system MTU size and routing MTU sizes are at 1998.
The switch is a 2960 Cisco
All transfer requests which meet the policies get approved and
updated in the registry. ARIN does turn down transfer requests
which don't meet policy, and this potential is often understood
and covered in proposed sale documents for IP address blocks.
would you be willing to describe what
On 9/19/2011 12:22 AM, jacob miller wrote:
I have tried the pings and am able to ping through with a size of 1600 with the
df-bit set
without the df-bit am able to get up to 9000.
The switched on bot ends hav been set to allow jumbo frames through and the
system MTU size and routing MTU
The entire link is an STM4 that has been channelised.
We are using 3xSTM1 for the EoS service.
The VCG group is configured with 3xSTM1.
Regards,
Jacob Miller
- Original Message -
From: Alastair Johnson a...@sneep.net
To: jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
What exactly do you mean by meaningful traffic? ICMP from port to port works,
can you pass TCP? SSH between routers? Establish a TCP session over it?
Are you using Juniper SRXs ? :-)
--
Leigh Porter
On 19 Sep 2011, at 08:24, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have tried the pings and
I have triend to do a ping with the DF bit set.
Maximum am able to get to is 1600.
This am guessing is because of the fact I have set the mtu size on My interface
to 1600.
I have also enable all alarms on the node and am getting the following alarm
which is registering as beign Minor.
High
Did so and am able to ping through
Regards,
Jacob Miller
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com
To: jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: SDH Fiber Problem
Did you try
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
He pointed out that these are the kind of problems city folk probably don't
have in an urban area because there is a bear shortage.
And backwoods towns have rednecks with shotguns, and bubba the backhoe
driver exists everywhere
Have you tried doing a tcpdump to see if that shows anything meaningful?
On 19/09/2011 5:33 PM, jacob miller wrote:
Did so and am able to ping through
Regards,
Jacob Miller
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Porterleigh.por...@ukbroadband.com
To: jacob millermmzi...@yahoo.com
Cc:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:17:57 PDT, Cameron Byrne said:
Call me optimistic but ipv6 does not have these issues...
For anyone making STRATEGIC choices about ipv4 investments... beware of
sharks in these waters, not just the cgn pains
For many of us (especiially the ones who have ipv6
On Sep 19, 2011, at 3:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
All transfer requests which meet the policies get approved and
updated in the registry. ARIN does turn down transfer requests
which don't meet policy, and this potential is often understood
and covered in proposed sale documents for IP address
I have been trying to create EoS however am getting the following:
I can ping on point to point
I have BGP up and running
When I try to pass traffic over the link my clients are unable to pass any
meanigful traffic asn browsing is impossible.
Any assistance and direction in terms of any
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [mailto:ops.li...@gmail.com]
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
He pointed out that these are the kind of problems city
folk probably
don't have in an urban area because there is a bear shortage.
On 09/18/11 19:41, Frank Bulk wrote:
I should have made myself more clear -- the policy amendment would make
clear that multihoming requires only one facilities-based connection and
that the other connections could be fulfilled via tunnels. This may be
heresy for some.
I don't think the
Works fine here.
# wget -6 www.charter.com
--2011-09-19 10:24:37-- http://www.charter.com/
Resolving www.charter.com... 2607:f428:3:1:80:80:80:1
Connecting to www.charter.com|2607:f428:3:1:80:80:80:1|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [text/html]
I've been told by someone else offline that it's fine for them, too. Last
hop according to tcptraceroute6 is Qwest. Anyone else going to
www.charter.com (IPv6) through Qwest?
nagios:/home/fbulk# tcptraceroute6 www.charter.com
traceroute to www.charter.com (2607:f428:3:1:80:80:80:1) from
Worth a read:
http://blog.level3.com/2011/08/04/the-10-most-bizarre-and-annoying-causes-of-fiber-cuts/
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Jason LeBlanc j...@packetpimp.org wrote:
We have had fiber shot with what apparently was apparently a handgun in
down town Miami. Interesting that is
Takes our HE tunnel to get out. Were also Native with Cogent (Not that it
gets us anything..)
No dice.
[root@bench ~]# wget -6 www.charter.com
--2011-09-19 13:53:17-- http://www.charter.com/
Resolving www.charter.com... 2607:f428:3:1:80:80:80:1
Connecting to
Hi!
Takes our HE tunnel to get out. Were also Native with Cogent (Not that it
gets us anything..)
No dice.
Native also no luck here (from .nl) :
[root@ipv6proxy ~]# traceroute6 www.charter.com
traceroute to www.charter.com (2607:f428:3:1:80:80:80:1), 30 hops max, 80
byte packets
1
We had a cow break down a door to a remote microwave site once...now we are
the proud owners of a generator backed electric fence at that site...Rural
physical plant issues are almost always entertaining. :)
John
-Original Message-
From: Eric J Esslinger
Actually just started seeing these problems again today. Is anyone else seeing
this today from something other than 212.118.142.0/24? Looks like it started
about two hours ago.
Regards,
Ryan Gray
Long Lines
www.longlines.com
On Sep 12, 2011, at 8:18 PM, Schiller, Heather A wrote:
Seeing it again here too.. Has anyone contacted them?
..and for folks who are choosing to blackhole the prefix in order to supress
the route, please remember not to export it!
AS25019 SAUDINETSTC-AS Autonomus System Number for SaudiNet 2011-09-08
18:23:53 UTC 2011-09-19 19:16:27 UTC
Strange, a curl request works for me through one of our he.net tunnels
but not the other (sorry, won't post the address space on the list).
On 9/19/11 10:57 AM, Nick Olsen wrote:
Takes our HE tunnel to get out. Were also Native with Cogent (Not that it
gets us anything..)
No dice.
It looks like we have identified the issue, and we are currently working to
resolve as quickly as possible.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:09 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: IPv6 side of www.charter.com has
Several offlist contacts have shared working and non-working results, so
it's a mixed bag.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Gino [mailto:g...@1337.io]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:29 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 side of www.charter.com has been down since Friday,
Our monitoring system reported that the site now is accessible -- thanks!
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Schleeper, Brian [mailto:brian.schlee...@chartercom.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:57 PM
To: frnk...@iname.com; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: IPv6 side of www.charter.com has
In the off chance that no one already attempted an email to the folks
nominally in charge there:
person: Hejji almazroua
address:SaudiNet
address:P.O.Box: 295997, Riyadh 11351, Saudi Arabia.
phone: +9661 218 0300
fax-no: +9661 218 0311
e-mail:
suliman.alz...@saudi.net.sa - bounces :( Ripe folks (if listening)
perhaps you could ping the other live POC's there and request an
update? :)
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
In the off chance that no one already attempted an email to the folks
Hi Chris,
I've send an email to the person I know within STC responsible for
international transit.
Let's hope he can assist.
Regards,
Erik Bais
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:58 PM
To: Schiller,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Erik Bais eb...@a2b-internet.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
I've send an email to the person I know within STC responsible for
international transit.
Let's hope he can assist.
excellent! :)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Morrow
On Sep 16, 2011, at 2:53 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:42:18 -, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com said:
Configure Quagga w/ the obtained ASN and announce the IP prefix(es).
TaDa ... You are an ISP!
Now all you need is a business plan that pays for the rack
Hi Guys,
Is yahoo seriously blocking emails with variants of the words
occupywallstreet?
--
Landon Stewart lstew...@superb.net
SuperbHosting.Net by Superb Internet Corp.
Toll Free (US/Canada): 888-354-6128 x 4199
Direct: 206-438-5879
Web hosting and more Ahead of the Rest:
A quick test shows that they are not blocking, at least for me.
-Ken Stox
k...@stox.org
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
I should have made myself more clear -- the policy amendment would make
clear that multihoming requires only one facilities-based connection and
that the other connections could be fulfilled via tunnels. This may be
heresy for some.
That's not
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:20 AM, John van Oppen
jvanop...@spectrumnet.us wrote:
We had a cow break down a door to a remote microwave site once... now we
are the proud owners of a generator backed electric fence at that site...
Rural physical plant issues are almost always entertaining.
And if they turn up the voltage on the fence high enough, dinner could be
cooked by the time the crew gets there!
On Sep 19, 2011 9:34 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:20 AM, John van Oppen
jvanop...@spectrumnet.us wrote:
We had a cow br...
Your
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:49, Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
And if they turn up the voltage on the fence high enough, dinner could be
cooked by the time the crew gets there!
Not quite. The point of the electric fence is to discourage
moooving through it, but you do not want
On Sep 19, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
And if they turn up the voltage on the fence high enough, dinner could be
cooked by the time the crew gets there!
Nah, they are high frequency and high voltage, but very low current. It's
uncomfortable and may cause local burning similar to
On 9/19/2011 6:02 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
I should have made myself more clear -- the policy amendment would make
clear that multihoming requires only one facilities-based connection and
that the other connections could be fulfilled via tunnels. This may be
On 9/19/2011 6:02 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
I should have made myself more clear -- the policy amendment would make
clear that multihoming requires only one facilities-based connection and
that the other connections could be fulfilled via tunnels. This may be
1) One IP connection via a T-1. Second IP connection via GRE tunnel
carried on first.
2) One IP connection via a T-1 that doesn't have transit, only peering
with providers B and C. IP connections via two GRE tunnels to providers
B and C.
3) One IP connection via MPLS over T-1. Second
On 9/19/2011 8:32 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
you left out one connection via a chevy full of hollerith cards and
the second a canoe full of 7 track tape in waterproof containers.
They certainly have different loss characteristics, even if you don't
get unique routing policy out of it.
Matthew
On 9/16/2011 11:14 AM, Eric Wieling wrote:
I think the question was far too vague. The first thing you need to start an
ISP is LOTS OF MONEY.
That's if you want to make a little money running an ISP. If you want to
make lots of money running an ISP, it takes *even more* money.
Matthew
On 9/16/2011 12:58 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
I wonder what would happen if a new ARIN member requested an IPv4 block of say
a /16 for a new business? Or even a smaller block. I don't know what the
current ARIN rules are but RIPE will currently give out six months worth of
space. Now, in six
On 9/18/2011 7:27 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
I understand that tunneling meets the letter of the ARIN policy, but
I'll make the bold assumption that wasn't the spirit of the policy
when it was written. Maybe the policy needs to be amended to clarify
- Original Message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
you left out one connection via a chevy full of hollerith cards and
the second a canoe full of 7 track tape in waterproof containers.
That's a station wagon full of magtape. Henry would be disappointed.
Cheers,
-- jra
* See also
On 09/19/2011 10:40 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
On 9/16/2011 12:58 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
I wonder what would happen if a new ARIN member requested an IPv4
block of say a /16 for a new business? Or even a smaller block. I
don't know what the current ARIN rules are but RIPE will currently
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:32:04 +0200, Randy Bush said:
you left out one connection via a chevy full of hollerith cards and the
second a canoe full of 7 track tape in waterproof containers.
Does anybody actually *have* a functional 7 track drive? I remember seeing a
story on PBS (may have been a
given that as 729 maxes out at 800cpi there are probably slightly kinky
ways to attack the problem, e.g. someone doing it with disk packs.
http://chrisfenton.com/cray-1-digital-archeology/
there's still plenty of equipment that can wrap 1/2 tape around a spindle.
On 9/19/11 21:14 ,
On 9/19/2011 9:20 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Does anybody actually *have* a functional 7 track drive?
if you really need one, i know what trail i would start to follow.
there are folk keeping old stuff alive and pulling arcane things
off old media (like the besm-6 system).
randy
I haven't
I got an email response on 11th Sep when made a complaint for the same, they
said, it is one of our customer's prefix. THATS IT.
They didn't share any reason for rogue attributes, for them it is more
likely a Juniper box their client is using.
Very helpfull info though :)
Regards,
Aftab A.
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Does anybody actually *have* a functional 7 track drive?
The folks restoring at least one IBM 1401 probably have several.
http://ibm-1401.info/
Other than replacing a lot of older tab shop hardware, a primary
57 matches
Mail list logo
