On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
> Yes, it's possibly foolish to allocate x.y.z.0 or .255.
>
> But saying that that x.y.z.0 is *not* *capable* of representing an
> interface is
> demonstrating a dangerous lack of knowledge. There's several totally legal
> .0
> and .255 addresses in each
I do some protective service work, one client is the head of a Washington
D.C. NGO that faced a credible death threat last month. Tonight I received
information that the source of this threat traced one of the NGO's
volunteers to her home address via Comcast IP, and the location is a
relatively sh
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 21 21:12:43 2011 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 13-Oct-11 -to- 20-Oct-11 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS982944731 3.0% 65.6 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone
2 - AS812 3
Can someone on list put me in touch with an individual in Merit.edu's
security team. An address in their netblock introduced themselves to one
my my VoIP honeypots, unsure whether to send it to abuse as it will
likely be confusing (the write up).
--
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Despite this being a north american list anyone know how I can speak with
someone from saudi telecom. Preferably someone with the ever illusive clue?
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
Hello NANOG,
We are currently in the process of rolling out a Motorola GPON solution and
running into some hiccups and wanted to see if we were doing something unique
or if anyone else has run into the issue and we just haven't found the right
solution.
Our configuration has the OLTs using sin
8 matches
Mail list logo