On 14 March 2014 05:14, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 13, 2014 7:37 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
..
Sorry for my note. Didn't mean it to sidetrack the question (I probably
should've).
/me o_O
Social perception of hacking affect law-making.
Computing security
Hi list
I'm looking for a DNS solution to do a parental controls for a small ISP,
as in ISP branded services.
OpenDNS only supports corporate customers .
Please contact me off or on-list, if you have any vendors that you can
recommend.
Regards
MKS
Just a quick note to let folks know about a new vulnerability we have
found in some low-rent DNS forwarders---which we have been calling the
'preplay attack'.
The finding is that when the vulnerable open resolvers receive a DNS
response they just look at the query string in the response to see
On 14/03/2014 13:45, Mark Allman wrote:
- We have found 7--9% of the open resolver population---or 2-3 million
boxes---to be vulnerable to this cache poisoning attack. (The
variance is from different runs of our experiments.)
did you characterise what dns servers / embedded kit were
On Mar 14, 2014, at 7:06 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:59:27PM +,
Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote
a message of 10 lines which said:
did you characterise what dns servers / embedded kit were
vulnerable?
He said We have not been able
On 14/03/2014 16:05, Merike Kaeo wrote:
Has someone / is someone doing this?
someone has, and many CPEs use dnsmasq. current uplink too slow to find
references.
Nick
Well, at least all this CPE checks in for security updates every night so
this should be fixable. Oh wait, no, nevermind, they don't. :-(
This is getting to be the vulnerability of the week club for home gateway
devices - quite concerning.
JL
On 3/14/14, 12:05 PM, Merike Kaeo
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
Got it!
Thankyou very much for help. Have a good weekend ahead.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 3/13/2014 5:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
If your customers are using BIND there is a flag you can supply to named
to cause it to operate only in IPv4.
We have a number of customers in the DC area on Verizon Fios who can talk
to us using http, but not https. Linkedin also tweeted there are issues via
Verzion Fios.
Verizon support so far denies everything.
Anyone else seeing issues?
--
Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #:
This report has been generated at Fri Mar 14 21:37:59 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
BGP Update Report
Interval: 06-Mar-14 -to- 13-Mar-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS29571 48376 2.4% 267.3 -- CITelecom-AS
2 - AS10620 36314 1.8% 14.4 --
Have we ascertained if there is a typical configuration adjustment
that can be made to reduce or eliminate the likelihood of impact?
(From the description it sounds as though this is not possible but it
doesn't hurt to ask.)
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:05:00AM -0700, Merike Kaeo wrote:
On Mar
(As if the US has control anyway)
It's all over the popular press, strange I haven't seen it here.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/200889-us-to-relinquish-internet-control
Was I being a pollyanna?
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
R's,
John
On Mar 14, 2014, at 9:19 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
While it is not possible to know what will happen in the future, we do
have some idea of what _won't_ happen:
From
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a
government or an inter-governmental organization solution.
Let's hope you're right, but I note that the ITU isn't an
inter-governmental
On Mar 14, 2014, at 11:13 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a
government or an inter-governmental organization solution.
Let's hope you're right, but I note that the ITU isn't an inter-governmental
organization, it's
On Mar 14, 2014, at 8:13 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I look forward to the ITU equitably allocating domain names and IP
addresses.
NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a
government or an inter-governmental organization solution.
Let's hope
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
(As if the US has control anyway)
It's all over the popular press, strange I haven't seen it here.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/200889-us-to-relinquish-internet-control
20 matches
Mail list logo
