Google has always played fast and loose with its AI claims, but today t has
gone too far. In a WSJ story, Google is misleading people into thinking it has
achieved emotion, if not outright consciousness, in its AI programming:
On Jun 26, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single
person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your
I cant say much about other incumbents but i have been in alot of vz co's
in nj/nyc and Its very rare to see any humans in a CO anymore even in ones
in really dense metro areas
On Jun 26, 2015 10:40 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:32 PM, John
On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:48 , manning bmann...@karoshi.com wrote:
Quite a few folks actually. (the 802.5 802.4 specs)….
This is kind of like asking when we will stop using ethernet framing
(ethernet was designed for a 3Mbps transmission rate)
yet we are deploying 100Gbps networks. Still
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 08:02:52 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
On Jun 27, 2015, at 11:48 , manning bmann...@karoshi.com wrote:
Quite a few folks actually. (the 802.5 802.4 specs)
.
This is kind of like asking when we will stop using ethernet framing
(ethernet was designed for a 3Mbps
On Jun 28, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:
Has anyone gotten a non-factory firmware to go onto these guys? There are a
couple threads on Google that are inconclusive. There are rumors that it's
the same as a Dell something or an HP something else, but no one has
On 6/28/15 12:50 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Has anyone gotten a non-factory firmware to go onto these guys? There are a couple
threads on Google that are inconclusive. There are rumors that it's the same as a Dell something or
an HP something else, but no one has outright said, I loaded a Dell
*nods* I'm surprised that I missed that announcement until this morning. Given
the love\hate I have with UBNT, I may end up getting them... and then hating
myself for it.
Those in the WISP business will understand. For those not in the WISP business,
case of vendor doesn't listen on a regular
Has anyone gotten a non-factory firmware to go onto these guys? There are a
couple threads on Google that are inconclusive. There are rumors that it's the
same as a Dell something or an HP something else, but no one has outright said,
I loaded a Dell firmware onto it and solved all of the
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote:
Don't computer scientists have a responsibility to deal forthrightly with the
public on the real state of research in such fields as AI? When an Internet
provider like Google makes such outlandish claims, one has to wonder
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, chris wrote:
I cant say much about other incumbents but i have been in alot of vz co's
in nj/nyc and Its very rare to see any humans in a CO anymore even in ones
in really dense metro areas
The majority of ILEC COs I've seen are unstaffed these days, save for the
rare
Use wireless. There are reasonably priced point to point bridges available.
--
Keith Stokes
On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Peter Kristolaitis alte...@alter3d.ca wrote:
On 6/26/2015 7:26 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 26 Jun 2015, at 15:04, Hank Disuko wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing
I'm designing the first phase of a datacenter network monitoring project
for my company. We are starting with SPAN at access layer and plan to
control traffic volume using filtering, slicing, de-dupe, etc. There are
instances when we need to do capacity/delay analysis on L2 traffic and
Ixia,
Because Google is an ISP, it seems to me a legitimate discussion point. Given
Google's penchant for crafty customer surveillance, this technology seems like
one that Google might try to leverage into a snoopy product. .
-mel via cell
On Jun 28, 2015, at 10:59 PM, Christopher Morrow
has nothing to do with network operations. stick to reddit or slashdot.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015, 20:57 Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote:
Because Google is an ISP, it seems to me a legitimate discussion point.
Given Google's penchant for crafty customer surveillance, this technology
seems like
15 matches
Mail list logo
