Re: /27 the new /24

On 12 Oct 2015, at 11:23, Todd Underwood wrote: it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes that serve these kinds of collections of people. I think that's true. But I don't think it's always the case this means there is no point. When Citylink (incubated by the

Re: /27 the new /24

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Todd Underwood wrote: > > it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes > that serve these kinds of collections of people. > > how much inter-ASN traffic is there generally for a city of 100k > people, even if they all

Re: /27 the new /24

it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes that serve these kinds of collections of people. how much inter-ASN traffic is there generally for a city of 100k people, even if they all have 1Gb/s connections? are they all torrenting, accessing local business web pages that

GPON Optical Levels

We are deploying our first GPON network, and are trying to get a sense of what is a good optical level per ONT. The equipment install guide says the following: Measure the levels of the 1550 dBm and 1490 dBm receive optical inputs using an optical power meter. The input range should be between

Re: /27 the new /24

On 10/12/15 1:57 AM, Henrik Thostrup Jensen wrote: > On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Jeremy Austin wrote: > >> Juneau, I'm not so surprised; how many other cities that small and >> isolated >> have IXes? I'm curious. It's an interesting prospect, at least for some >> value of $location. > > Several small

Re: /27 the new /24

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Jeremy Austin wrote: Juneau, I'm not so surprised; how many other cities that small and isolated have IXes? I'm curious. It's an interesting prospect, at least for some value of $location. Several small cities in Sweden have IXes. Not sure than any of them are quite as

Re: /27 the new /24

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Todd Underwood wrote: > it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes > that serve these kinds of collections of people. > one might consider that localized services or peer-to-peer traffic might not want to burden the

Re: /27 the new /24

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Todd Underwood wrote: > all, > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Christopher Morrow > wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Todd Underwood wrote: >>> it's also not entirely obvious what

Re: /27 the new /24

On 10/09/2015 05:22 AM, Lee Howard wrote: NO, THERE IS NOT. We operate in rural and underserved areas and WE DO NOT HAVE realistic choices. Can you see me from your ivory tower? I looked up tiedyenetworks.com, and I think he¹s 100 miles from Sacramento. I hope some sales person from a transit

Re: /27 the new /24

all, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Todd Underwood wrote: >> it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes >> that serve these kinds of collections of people. >> >

Re: GPON Optical Levels

On 12 October 2015 at 18:25, Jameson, Daniel wrote: > There should never be a need to attenuate a PON port unless you're working > directly on the OLT (You should work through a splitter even directly in > the CO/HE) > Here is a small secret: If you attenuate the

Re: /27 the new /24

On 10/12/15, 1:49 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Mike" wrote: > >Thats not even the half of it. > >My personal heroics in solving the connectivity problem here, is that we >became a CLEC in order to take the bull on by the short and

Re: /27 the new /24

On 12 October 2015 at 19:49, Mike wrote: > No, it's not going to help. v6 over current wireless doesn't work for the > reasons that multicast is a gaping hole. Why is IPv6 multicast any different than IPv4 broadcast (required for ARP and many other things)? If

Re: IPv6 Irony.

On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher wrote: > > Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6 > has come.. I find my experience with support today > Ironic. > > Oh wait.. > > Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself. > > Irony is a cable

RE: IP-Echelon Compliance

Hi All, Please feel free to get in touch with us to request changes. Expedited processing of your requests is offered through the Notice Recipient Management for ISPs section of our website located here: http://www.ip-echelon.com/isp-notice-management/

IPv6 Irony.

Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6 has come.. I find my experience with support today Ironic. Oh wait.. Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself. Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of IPv6, having ZERO IPv6