Re: Public DNS64

IP6.ARPA lookups aren't working. Adobe.com doesn't have record so it correctly returns a DNS64 mapped record. However when you attempt to do a IP6.ARPA lookup on that address it does not follow the synthesised CNAME record as you would expect from a recursive DNS64 server. Mark ;

Re: Public DNS64

In message

Re: Public DNS64

DNS64 is a bad solution. It breaks DNSSEC. The proported benefits of DNS64 over other ways of providing IPv4 over IPv6 don't actually exist. DS-Lite or one of the MAP encapsulation will actually be better in the long run. I say this as someone who has written a DNS64 implementation. Mark In

Re: Public DNS64

Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would be unstable. Sorry time to get to sleep. Regards Baldur Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" : > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the > 64:ff9b::/96

Re: Public DNS64

Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service. Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" : > For the record: > > Tim, > > I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this > thread: > >

Re: Public DNS64

For the record: Tim, I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this thread: https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html but I figured I'd let you know that: https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64 is now available for

Re: NANOG 67 closing social

There is indeed a social weds night! The host sponsor, EdgeConneX is holding its social on Weds. Please plan accordingly! Ilissa Miller > On May 29, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Mike Joseph wrote: > > Sending this to the list as well as Betty, in case anyone on the PC has > more details:

Re: CALEA

How many requests per 1k or 10k customers? Is primarily residential a safe assumption? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Mike Joseph wrote: > I can say via firsthand knowledge that

Re: CALEA

I can say via firsthand knowledge that CALEA requests are definitely happening and are not even that rare, proportional to a reasonably sized subscriber-base. It would be unlawful for me to comment specifically on any actual CALEA requests, however. But if you have general questions about my

NANOG 67 closing social

Sending this to the list as well as Betty, in case anyone on the PC has more details: I've noticed on the NANOG 67 agenda that there's a social scheduled for Wednesday night, which I think is odd since we (almost) never have any social or other events after conference closing. In fact, I noticed

Re: VOIP Monitoring Solution

Check out voipmonitor.org. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:10 AM, segs wrote: > Hi All, > > I Am on the lookout for a solution that can monitor IP phones in use on the > network. > > The solution should have > > -- a very intuitive GUI > > -- detailed reporting

Re: Global/distributed IXP operators?

I think he means IXes like NetIX: http://netix.net/map, a single distributed fabric. Regards, Marty Strong -- CloudFlare - AS13335 Network Engineer ma...@cloudflare.com +44 7584 906 055 smartflare (Skype) http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 > On 29

Re: Global/distributed IXP operators?

Could you define what you mean by a distributed\global IXP? There are plenty of IXPs, but there aren't really global IXPs, those just become networks. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com -